- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
It looks more like Ari is reacting to/laughing at someone in front of her rather than reacting to the lump next to her. I assume she's beaming at one of the Smiths. Thank goodness she has them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who’s filming?
Is Ari retarded or suffered a major head trauma she didn't tell us about? No?
My 2 year old, and millions of others across the world, sat on the footplate of the buggy when a new sibling ousted them from the seat.New "what could possibly go wrong?" grid post:
For once, this doesn't look too unsafe. Obviously not recommended, but as long as Ari is leaning against momma she's safe. Not because her mother is competent or anything, but gravity -- Alex's chair is tilted too far back for her to just fall forward suddenly. We all survived "it's fun, but you must..."My 2 year old, and millions of others across the world, sat on the footplate of the buggy when a new sibling ousted them from the seat.
This is probably no more dangerous than that without the added distraction of a newly born baby in between her and Ari.
However...
I'm concerned that Alex is probably drunk driving the wheelchair and her reaction time is most likely severely impacted. The difference to Ari is horrifying to contemplate, falling off the footplate of the buggy and getting run over by it will result in Bruises, Scrapes,and Tears.
Falling off the footplate of her wheelchair and getting run over by it will result in Hospital, ICU, and maybe even a teeny tiny casket.
Once again, Alex manages to turn a fairly normal childhood moment into a terrifying dice with death that is horrifying to witness.
but no straps.Selfie with prominent cross
As far as I know this only applies to residents of California.I am SURE that Alex is storing away any money she makes from clicks for Ari /sarcasm/
Senate Bill 764
Senate Bill 764, or the Child Content Creator Rights Act, establishes additional legal and financial protections for minors featured in monetized online content. According to the bill’s author, Senator Padilla, it was critical to adapt California’s “landmark protections,” like the Coogan Law, “to keep up with the natural evolution of entertainment.” However, Senate Bill 764 extends past the protections outlined in the Coogan Law, which protects only those under contract.
This newly enacted legislation requires content creators that feature minors in at least 30 percent of their content (even if the minors are not contracted to do so) to deposit 65 percent of the minor’s gross earnings in a trust account they can access when they reach adulthood. Thus, the new law ensures protections for children who may be featured by their parents or legal guardians in family marketing campaigns without any formal employment or engagement to perform.
I believe Illinois has its own version of this law. Not sure about Florida, though.As far as I know this only applies to residents of California.
I don't think Florida does. Utah just passed one though. Mormon mommy vloggers btfo, inshallah.I believe Illinois has its own version of this law. Not sure about Florida, though.
Lmao Florida is trying to roll back child labor laws. Fortunately some of our legislature has common sense and shot it down. I highly doubt they give a shit about children in tik toks.I believe Illinois has its own version of this law. Not sure about Florida, though.