Alexandra Rodriguez / Alexandra Irene Thomas / Learning to be Fearless - pathological liar, fake BoPo advocate, professional dropout, apex consumer, great big fatty, now a mother

Elderly beef taco said:
Good on her, honestly. That's more responsibility than most dog owners seem to have online.
Click to expand...
Bruno is a major asset to her channel and her Instagram. He’s front and centre for cute content, and another avenue to use Amazon links. Her subs love him so he’s always featured. While many of the things she links for him are just dumb (eg the dog leash that secured around her fat and pregnant gut so she could vlog with one hand and eat/drink with the other…she used it once and was pulled into a pothole and fell…we never saw that leash again), he does make her money so she needs to appear to care for him. She doesn’t really though, as shown by her letting his dogshit built up in the backyard all winter before cleaning it up in summer, he’s also untrained aside from his initial training by a professional as a puppy. Many viewers suspect he is crated for much of the day. His crate, currently in their lounge room is not very big either. Yar has nothing to do with him, and won’t allow him noisy toys, or walk him when he could easily take Bruno on his daily runs.

Baby Fearless will be treated no differently. He will be a cash cow who she will ensure appears to be cared for, but the reality is more likely that she’ll neglect his real needs behind the scenes. Yar will be his main caregiver, which we are seeing already. Alex gets all the daytime cuddles and the oohs and ahhs, while Yar takes the night shift and probably every other task that doesn’t involve dressing baby for appearances on camera.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: GoodLard, everybody in Portugal, crungy spingus and 12 others
The Judean People's Front said:
I really don't think you can remove stickers/emojis what-have-you unless you have the raw photo with its layers available for edit.

For shits and gigs, I downloaded a couple of apps that claimed they could remove emojis from photos, but what they all actually do is use AI to fill in the area. So you can try to remove Anderson Pooper's face covers, but you get this:
View attachment 6409352

Honestly, I'm pleasantly surprised she's not spamming his lil face everywhere. I still wish influencer Moms wouldn't exploit their kids for clicks, but if it must be done, face-covering the kid is the very least you can do.

If I'm totally wrong and dumb about the removal of stickers/emojis, I'd love to know.

Edit to add: that pumpkin pillow is legitimately the ugliest piece of trash I've ever seen her purchase, and that's a high bar.
Click to expand...

Thank you for posting this. Too many people are sperging out about how there are ways to remove an emoji from an image but you are correct, unless the layers are available, which how could they be especially if posted on SM, it just isn't possible.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: GoodLard, ayotochin, Aynat Yxor and 10 others
The Judean People's Front said:
I really don't think you can remove stickers/emojis what-have-you unless you have the raw photo with its layers available for edit.
Click to expand...

RainbowStarlight said:
Thank you for posting this. Too many people are sperging out about how there are ways to remove an emoji from an image but you are correct, unless the layers are available, which how could they be especially if posted on SM, it just isn't possible.
Click to expand...

Thanks for clarifying this. I'm seeing that particular accusation against her all over the place and had no ida if it was true or not. It did seem odd that Yar would be unaware of it, because he was talking about tech-related concerns when he was discussing not showing the baby.

New story content:

ar_01.png

ar_02.png

The signature "pretend I have only one chin" hand positioning. The hair is an improvement, though.

ar_03.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: GoodLard, everybody in Portugal, Aynat Yxor and 10 others
often puzzled said:
Thanks for clarifying this. I'm seeing that particular accusation against her all over the place and had no ida if it was true or not. It did seem odd that Yar would be unaware of it, because he was talking about tech-related concerns when he was discussing not showing the baby.

New story content:

View attachment 6412461

View attachment 6412462

The signature "pretend I have only one chin" hand positioning. The hair is an improvement, though.

View attachment 6412463
Click to expand...
Color me pleasantly surprised again with Fatlex. That hair is a smart move with much less upkeep; the color is very flattering as well. Much moreso than the bright blonde. Looks like she chopped a bit of length too which can be such a relief when you're caring for an adorable poop and spit up machine.

She's still a saltine cracker of a "personality" but it she is making at least some choices that will be in Anderson Pooper's best interest. I know it's the lowest bar possible, but this thread is practically wholesome compared to the other Lolcow Mom threads.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: everybody in Portugal, crungy spingus, Concerned Onlooker and 14 others
DefCon Dumb said:
I have to give her this. She appears to have her shit together to a far higher degree than I did at this stage of early motherhood.
Click to expand...
“Appears”? What have you actually seen her do? All I’ve seen is cuddles, a walk in a pram, and a ride in his car seat while she vlogs. Admittedly I haven’t watched her decorate for fall vlog. We haven’t seen her change baby, wash baby, settle him when he’s crying, or feed baby. We haven’t even seen her carry baby anywhere. Not that we’re entitled to that footage. My memory from early days with my kids was that was pretty much it was…feed, wash, change, comfort when crying! Cuddle time is easy especially when bubs is asleep.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Peace Or Love, GoodLard, Concerned Onlooker and 4 others
RainbowStarlight said:
I saw that video of Alan Robert's ripping her a new one for driving and filming with an infant in the car. I wonder when some dear redditor will actually report that to the county she lives in.
Click to expand...
They probably will and will be told to fuck off. It's not like she's holding the phone to film herself while driving. She's just talking, the same way you would talk to someone in the passenger seat. Do these people have no friends or family they talk to in the car? Probably not. In fact it's probably less distracting to monologue than to have a conversation with someone who replies back.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: GoodLard, everybody in Portugal, crungy spingus and 15 others
Lidl Drip said:
They probably will and will be told to fuck off. It's not like she's holding the phone to film herself while driving. She's just talking, the same way you would talk to someone in the passenger seat. Do these people have no friends or family they talk to in the car? Probably not. In fact it's probably less distracting to monologue than to have a conversation with someone who replies back.
Click to expand...
In my country she’d be done for distracted driving, but in her state of RI it appears that what she’s done is totally legal. So a clear case of YMMV
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodLard, everybody in Portugal, Concerned Onlooker and 2 others
The Judean People's Front said:
Confirmed Australians can't drive and talk at the same time.
Click to expand...
We can drive and talk on Bluetooth, just can’t physically touch the phone. it’s the camera that’s the issue . She’s “distracted” eye fucking herself in the camera. She’s even owned herself in this regard with the damage she needed to get repaired because she drove over something and damaged the undercarriage of her Tesla. I’m fascinated by certain states in the US allowing self drive cars, which commentators say Fat Al’s car is, and RI is a state where it’s legal. While I understand lane assist, park assist, self braking options etc, I don’t think I’d ever be able to trust a completely self driven car. I do wonder if Fat Alex is using the self drive capability, rather than actually driving the car herself.
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lucille's Brands, VinegarPussy, Aynat Yxor and 4 others
More from Alex's Instagram. She continues to get some pushback in the comments because-- predictably-- people aren't happy about how she is or isn't showing Anderson, what she is or isn't sharing about motherhood, and so on. We also have her clapping back at those who didn't believe she was actually pregnant. She hinted at that conspiracy but did not explicitly acknowledge it in the intro to her birth video, but she's addressing it plainly here.

Stories catchup:

ar_01.png



Grid post 1 (the clapping back one):



Comments include a fair amount of back-and-forth as well as references to YouTube reactors.

ar_02.png

ar_03.png

ar_04.png

ar_05.png

Grid post 2:



ar_06.png

ar_07.png

ar_08.png
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Miltank, everybody in Portugal, suspended animation and 10 others
Potato Archive:



Oh yeah, and that "I don't use slimming filters"? Pft, just because the filter isn't named "Slimmingtm" doesn't mean it's not a slimming filter, you dumb fuckwaffle. We've seen people glitch in the background of your videos, shit blur out in your stills, and backgrounds warp to accommodate you in both. De Nile, it is no river in Egypt my friends.
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Miltank, GoodLard, everybody in Portugal and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back