- Joined
- Dec 12, 2024
13 years ago, a UCLA student named Alexandra Wallace was one of the early cases of nationwide infamy for racial insensitivity and was one of the first nationwide "cancellations." She uploaded a video to Youtube where she complained about Asian students (who she described as "hordes of Asian people, which is fine" (lol) being disruptive in the library where she mimicked them with some Chinese sounding gibberish "Ching chong ling long ting tong" (again, lol). She also spoke about frustrations of their extended families flooding the campus on the weekends to do laundry and visitation, crowding full dorms with "the 20 people they took with them." (this woman is a gold mine) Alexandra is conventionally attractive and shows a great deal of cleavage in her vid, contributing to a bimbo like persona which only intensifies the comedy of the situation. It also bears noting that the incident in which all the Asians answered their phones in the library had something to do with some natural disaster in Asia that left many homeless, so her complaint was not well received.
Internet virality was a relatively new phenomenon for normies at this time and being "cancelled" for simply offending sensibilities was a pretty rare and new thing. The world has seen this story play out a thousand times with a thousand variations, only the names have changed. So, as I was thinking about our dear friend Alexandra a few minutes back, I got to thinking. If Alexandra's video is upsetting, shouldn't the parties who inflict it on others be seen as harm causers? If the content of the vid is allegedly harmful, shouldn't spreading it be some sort of offense in itself? If one takes the position that she owes her classmates an apology, THAT IS WHERE IT SHOULD END. I don't agree with that position, but she surely doesn't owe an apology to some blue haired freak in Portland.
Once upon a time, simply saying "okay, it was a bad joke, I'm sorry if I upset people, I'll be more careful in the future" was considered a reasonable resolution to these matters. If we live in a new age where sticks allegedly can break our bones, wouldn't that apply to the people who spread the hurt fee fee words without regard to their motives?
Alexandra apologized and this was before there was a track record of evidence that apologizing only encouraged the harassment. She dropped out because of her infamy and who knew what happened to her. A sane world would have just laughed and moved on. This was near the dawn of the dystopia that we live in and only are seeing marginal changes to this now.
I really pulled an excessive tl;dr here, but if Alexandra's words were hurtful, didn't third parties do 10,000 times the damage she did on her own?
Internet virality was a relatively new phenomenon for normies at this time and being "cancelled" for simply offending sensibilities was a pretty rare and new thing. The world has seen this story play out a thousand times with a thousand variations, only the names have changed. So, as I was thinking about our dear friend Alexandra a few minutes back, I got to thinking. If Alexandra's video is upsetting, shouldn't the parties who inflict it on others be seen as harm causers? If the content of the vid is allegedly harmful, shouldn't spreading it be some sort of offense in itself? If one takes the position that she owes her classmates an apology, THAT IS WHERE IT SHOULD END. I don't agree with that position, but she surely doesn't owe an apology to some blue haired freak in Portland.
Once upon a time, simply saying "okay, it was a bad joke, I'm sorry if I upset people, I'll be more careful in the future" was considered a reasonable resolution to these matters. If we live in a new age where sticks allegedly can break our bones, wouldn't that apply to the people who spread the hurt fee fee words without regard to their motives?
Alexandra apologized and this was before there was a track record of evidence that apologizing only encouraged the harassment. She dropped out because of her infamy and who knew what happened to her. A sane world would have just laughed and moved on. This was near the dawn of the dystopia that we live in and only are seeing marginal changes to this now.
I really pulled an excessive tl;dr here, but if Alexandra's words were hurtful, didn't third parties do 10,000 times the damage she did on her own?