All the Things I'm Not - Someone on AMB hurt Tom's feewings by telling him he can't own a gun, so he tries to disprove him and it goes as well as you'd expect

[I raped a dog 2day]

Phil suffers from fetal alcohol syndrome and is a government confirmed sped. What's Tommy's excuse?

50 years of weed fried his brain

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg , if you're not a filthy degenerate hobo, then why do you have flies on your head? Answer that.

 

[Alex Krycek]

Tom, speaking as someone who worked for years in the firearms industry I can say with total certainty any vendor who saw you would consider you a liability, that’s also assuming NICS even approves you for your background check. You could probably get a Private Seller to pony something up if you’re willing to pay the mark up but keep in mind there’s no guarantee those guns work and don’t assume they’ll just sell to you because they see dollar signs. You are a liability. While they’re at no risk of losing a license someone like you shoots the wrong person and you have the ATF seizing all their assets.

 

[EmpireOfTheClouds]

Thomas with a gun. That might just be the easiest way to get him to stop shiting all over his forum.

Now that I think of it, Thomas is REALLY emulating another old cow here. Let's look at it:

1) He pretends to be trans but
2) Puts absolutely no effort into looking anything like a woman
3) Complete lack of hygiene
4) Obsessed with Kiwi Farms
5) Sexual deviant
6) Wants a gun, but we all know he'll never be able to get one
7) Claims to be a well known and highly respected member of far left groups, despite the fact that he's universally hated

The evidence is there: Tommy is just Philip Vincent Haskins-Delici just another 20-something years older. I hope those two have a crossover soon; it would be really entertaining.

Only Phil stopped just short of child rape and dog molestation.

Granted he did beat the shit out of his girlfriend in public, so...

 

[BigTodd]

From our friend Lurker on AMB that Tom is apparently responding to with this latest fail to win an internet argument:

My mistake, they updated the form. It's question 21 E

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/4473-part-1-firearms-transaction-record-over-counter-atf-form-53009/download

21 E

Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.

I certify that my answers in Section B are true, correct, and complete. I have read and understand the Notices, Instructions, and Definitions on ATF Form 4473. I understand that answering “yes” to question 21.a. if I am not the actual transferee/buyer is a crime punishable as a felony under Federal law, and may also violate State and/or local law. I understand that a person who answers “yes” to any of the questions 21.b. through 21.k. is prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm. I understand that a person who answers “yes” to question 21.l.1. is prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm, unless the person answers “yes” to question 21.l.2. and provides the documentation required in 26.d. I also understand that making any false oral or written statement, or exhibiting any false or misrepresented identification with respect to this transaction, is a crime punishable as a felony under Federal law, and may also violate State and/or local law. I further understand that the repetitive purchase of firearms for the purpose of resale for livelihood and profit without a Federal firearms license is a violation of Federal law.

Ergo, ( Tom ) is prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm and cannot legally purchase one. If he did manage to purchase one, he would be committing a federal felony and I would happily report him to the ATF along with links to videos he posts of smoking weed.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

From our friend Lurker on AMB that Tom is apparently responding to with this latest fail to win an internet argument:

You're the man, BT

 

[Postal_Rat]

I don't know how Tom got the idea that he could buy a gun from that phone call.
The more astute among us may note that he very specifically never says "Tom I would sell you a gun in fact those trolls sound very mentally ill you should come down and buy one" almost like he wants to avoid any entanglement with the crazed pedophile who some how managed to dial his number despite his severe brain damage.