Amazon Patents Online Matchmaking Based on Player Behavior & Preferences to Separate Toxic Gamers - Great, now I'm stuck with all of you faggots.

SiccDicc

The Defenestrator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 8, 2017

An Amazon patent has now been approved, designed to group online players based on their preferences and behaviors; including “toxic” players.

Protocol reports (Editor’s Note: Despite the title, Amazon is mentioned further down in the article) on a patent filed by Amazon in 2017, and approved on October 20th of this year.

The abstract states how the patent is for “generating a multiplayer game session including a set of players with compatible preferences and behaviors.” The patent itself continues, discussing how players “naively” only matched with those of a similar skill level.

The patent argues that doing so as the primary or only factor in putting players together into a match is bad, as “toxic” players can ruin the experience for others. Even so, broadly dividing players as toxic or non-toxic is also too broad; as each individual can categorize different behaviors as toxic.

As such, the patent proposes players being grouped based on their behaviors, and preferences for who they play against. As such, players in that session are more likely to enjoy themselves, and get along with those they play against.

Several games have reportedly relied on similar systems- but focused purely on toxic players or cheaters. Amazon’s patent could therefore have interesting consequences should a developer seek to do similar.

Namco (now Bandai Namco Entertainment) originally held the patent for minigames during loading screens, leading to very few of them until the patent expired in 2015. As such, this may mean other developers will be unable to use this technique without coming to an agreement with Amazon.

There is at least one way Amazon will not be able to use the patent. In early October of this year, Amazon Games announced their free-to-play shooter Cruicble was shutting down just five months after launch. The game had a shaky launch, was poorly received, and had a troubled post-launch development cycle.

In addition, Amazon have also recently patented a way to yell at delivery drones, so they recognize who they are supposed to deliver to by their voice.
 
So, this just means other games devs can't implement such a system until the patent expires, Based Amazon

Nah it just means corporations will either pay them to make their own or just use one Amazon made. Or just ignore it outright. There are so many video game patents that the original Super Mario Bros were in violation of several. And Nintendo was fully aware of that and gave no shits.
 
sometimes i get nostalgic for a time when online gaming was about playing games for fun instead of being a lab rat for intricate social engineering techniques
That and when you add on to the fact that most social engineering is temporary, and they’re using video games as a use of dopamine effect to FORCE you to play games you don’t want to play
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jolly Copulation
Nah it just means corporations will either pay them to make their own or just use one Amazon made. Or just ignore it outright. There are so many video game patents that the original Super Mario Bros were in violation of several. And Nintendo was fully aware of that and gave no shits.
Proof?
 
In early October of this year, Amazon Games announced their free-to-play shooter Cruicble was shutting down just five months after launch. The game had a shaky launch, was poorly received, and had a troubled post-launch development cycle.

One, that's not how you spell crucible. Two, when the fuck did that happen? It must of been bad because I didn't even hear people talk shit about it.
 
So Amazon just patented a system that uses an algorithm to do something that humans naturally do on their own, if given the option and means to do so.

The future, ladies and gentlemen.
Let's be honest, whiny faggots do not leave games when they're being fucked with. And they have nowhere else to go since modern vidya doesn't have dedicated servers - only matchmaking, which is what this algorithm is meant to serve.
 
So what if one player is just having a bad day? Are they forever going to be segregated into the toxic group for one outburst? Everyone has bad days.

Where have you been for the last decade?
People get fired from their jobs for making one wrong post like 8 years ago. This is an age where you literally cannot make a single mistake without it destroying your life.
 
so basically there is just a blatant patent to sequester fun in the same way that the Gods have done so with the internet and social media?

that ss13 server's lookin appetizing
 
Back