Business Amazon to Undergo Racial Audit

Article
Archive

Amazon.com Inc. said it agreed to undergo an independent racial equity audit, joining companies including Citigroup Inc. and Tyson Foods Inc. in performing such reviews.

The audit -- an analysis of companies to see whether their businesses cause and perpetuate discrimination -- will be led by former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, now a partner at law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Amazon said in a proxy statement filed Thursday.

The review will measure any disparate racial impacts on Amazon’s U.S. hourly employees resulting from policies, programs and practices, the world’s largest online retailer said. The Seattle-based company said it will publish the audit’s results once completed.

New York State Common Retirement Fund and its Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, which had pressed Amazon to conduct a racial audit, said they looked forward to learning more about Amazon’s plan for a review. But they said they “remain concerned that the company has provided few details and has made no assurances that the audit will be independent.”


The New York pension fund had filed a shareholder resolution with Amazon in 2021 asking for an audit, citing alleged discrimination of the company’s Black and Latinx workers, their low wages and exposure to dangerous working conditions, including Covid-19, as well as air pollution from distribution facilities located in minority neighborhoods. Amazon had also come under fire for its facial-recognition software.


While the proposal failed, it garnered 44.2% of shareholder support, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, the highest of all racial-audit resolutions that went to vote during last year’s annual shareholder meetings. The New York pension plan filed a similar proposal for Amazon’s May 25 annual meeting.

Amazon is advising shareholders to vote against the resolution because the company is now doing an audit. A company spokesman referred to the proxy statement filed last week.

Amazon joins other companies, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., that have agreed to perform racial audits after initially pushing back against doing them. They had cited their efforts such as funding historically Black colleges and universities, running leadership programs for underrepresented minorities and channeling tens of millions of dollars to help close the racial wealth divide.

Apple Inc. shareholders backed a call last month for the tech giant to undergo a civil-rights audit -- the first time such a resolution passed. Airbnb Inc. was the first company to do a racial audit back in 2016. Starbucks Corp. and Facebook Inc., now called Meta Platforms Inc., followed later.

They Who Have Ratfucked The World get subjected to the same struggle sessions they want on the rest of us. Serves them right.
 
Why the fuck this even got close it'll never understand. This just causes a disruption and if you're a shareholder the last thing you want is outsiders interfering with how you do business
Its because these companies want to keep high ESG ratings. Which were implemented by Blackrock CEO Larry Fink who is obsessed with this shit. I mean, the man controls fucking $10 trillion dollars and single-handedly brought the median housing price int he United States to $500,000.

If the man says 'jump', you fucking jump. He's probably the most influential person on the planet and could bring about anything he wanted to. If he wanted to revive the Nazi party, you'd bet your fucking ass Amazon shareholders would be looking for clones of Hitler.

Though if I controlled $10 trillion, I'd just collapse the world economy for fun. Realtalk.
 
Its because these companies want to keep high ESG ratings. Which were implemented by Blackrock CEO Larry Fink who is obsessed with this shit. I mean, the man controls fucking $10 trillion dollars and single-handedly brought the median housing price int he United States to $500,000.

If the man says 'jump', you fucking jump. He's probably the most influential person on the planet and could bring about anything he wanted to. If he wanted to revive the Nazi party, you'd bet your fucking ass Amazon shareholders would be looking for clones of Hitler.

Though if I controlled $10 trillion, I'd just collapse the world economy for fun. Realtalk.
I swear, that Fink fuck just makes me want to [FEDPOST REDACTED] . Seriously, one guy, holding that much power, shouldn't be allowed. I hate having some lousy little yid with a chip on his shoulder playing at being the fucking "invisible hand". If a government had balls, they'd either arrest or assassinate him.
 
I swear, that Fink fuck just makes me want to [FEDPOST REDACTED] . Seriously, one guy, holding that much power, shouldn't be allowed. I hate having some lousy little yid with a chip on his shoulder playing at being the fucking "invisible hand". If a government had balls, they'd either arrest or assassinate him.
Well, in the past when merchants or corporations had bigger powers than states, states went to war with them. Just look at the history of the merchant republics in Italy. I mean, states also used to kill their spies when they got too big for their britches as well.

Shocking how well war and murder used to work keeping corporations and spy agencies in line. Though I don't know if we want to exactly replicate the monarchy here.

But if you control $10 trillion dollars in this day and age, you know where every body is buried, every corpse hidden. You know who fucks who and what fucks what. But yes, it really does amaze me that governments and states have willingly surrendered power and authority to the corporate class and how much damage that actually did to the fucking entire earth. Which is why I laugh at libertarians.

I'm kind of out of ideas at how to reign this sort of shit in peacefully as no one who is going to be a politician is ever going to be allowed to do that. Like, you would have to be literally grown in a fucking vat in order to be robbed of all sexual impulses at the age of 40 in the year of our Lord 2022 to become a clean politician. And they'll still put child porn on your drop box and go 'lol FBI'. So what's the fucking point in even trying?

And they don't even have to do that, they just have to buy everyone around you and just immobilize you in red tape until you fucking die. So either you get rolled by a party van or have everyone you need completely bought so they constantly shove byzantine bureacratic nonsense down your throat that Kafka couldn't even come up with in fiction so you never get anything done.

Also be honest, would you REALLY want a French-Revolution style congress to try corporate leaders for execution? We all know how well THAT went. People just started killing each other over petty grudges and shit.

So there's no historical comparison. And every historical revolution I can think of that broke down the system did not exactly end up very well in the end.

I just throw my hands up nowadays and say "BURN IT ALL". Because I just no longer have realistic solutions to these problems that can be implemented in our current society under our current government.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Next Task
Oh no, they will find out that the more skilled positions are disproportionately filled with more skilled candidates and leading to racist outcomes.
Sounds like they're only auditing the low-wage workers. Although it would be hilarious if Amazon slit its own throat by allowing an audit of corporate headquarters. Only like 3 percent of compsci degrees go to black students. It's categorically impossible to get equal representation among software devs.
 
Well, in the past when merchants or corporations had bigger powers than states, states went to war with them. Just look at the history of the merchant republics in Italy. I mean, states also used to kill their spies when they got too big for their britches as well.

Shocking how well war and murder used to work keeping corporations and spy agencies in line. Though I don't know if we want to exactly replicate the monarchy here.

But if you control $10 trillion dollars in this day and age, you know where every body is buried, every corpse hidden. You know who fucks who and what fucks what. But yes, it really does amaze me that governments and states have willingly surrendered power and authority to the corporate class and how much damage that actually did to the fucking entire earth. Which is why I laugh at libertarians.

I'm kind of out of ideas at how to reign this sort of shit in peacefully as no one who is going to be a politician is ever going to be allowed to do that. Like, you would have to be literally grown in a fucking vat in order to be robbed of all sexual impulses at the age of 40 in the year of our Lord 2022 to become a clean politician. And they'll still put child porn on your drop box and go 'lol FBI'. So what's the fucking point in even trying?

And they don't even have to do that, they just have to buy everyone around you and just immobilize you in red tape until you fucking die. So either you get rolled by a party van or have everyone you need completely bought so they constantly shove byzantine bureacratic nonsense down your throat that Kafka couldn't even come up with in fiction so you never get anything done.

Also be honest, would you REALLY want a French-Revolution style congress to try corporate leaders for execution? We all know how well THAT went. People just started killing each other over petty grudges and shit.

So there's no historical comparison. And every historical revolution I can think of that broke down the system did not exactly end up very well in the end.

I just throw my hands up nowadays and say "BURN IT ALL". Because I just no longer have realistic solutions to these problems that can be implemented in our current society under our current government.
You know, SA, you put a lot of my thoughts quite accurately. We need to be radicals, fighting in the mountains and forests as well as parliaments and streets, to even effect a little substantial change. That, or force an economic collapse so severe that it puts these oligarchs, this "international clique" on the streets. But neither is a pleasant option, but is continuing with what is going on good either?

Personally, I wish I could have some sort of old fashioned American Republic led by great men, but I suppose that today, we'd need a Caesar to truly sweep out the rot. And come to think of it, if America is similar to the Roman Republic, then perhaps the time of the Republic should soon be over, given all that is occurring. Soon, we'll likely crave the iron fist of a master to the increasingly rotten velvet glove of whoever's in control at the top. I wouldn't be surprised, myself, as history occurs in cycles.
 
As a little aside, when I saw the headline, I thought to myself, "What, is Amazon not shipping enough niggers?"
 
Its because these companies want to keep high ESG ratings. Which were implemented by Blackrock CEO Larry Fink who is obsessed with this shit. I mean, the man controls fucking $10 trillion dollars and single-handedly brought the median housing price int he United States to $500,000.

If the man says 'jump', you fucking jump. He's probably the most influential person on the planet and could bring about anything he wanted to. If he wanted to revive the Nazi party, you'd bet your fucking ass Amazon shareholders would be looking for clones of Hitler.

Though if I controlled $10 trillion, I'd just collapse the world economy for fun. Realtalk.
power is wasted on the kind of worthless faggot who seeks unobtainable abstracts
 
Also be honest, would you REALLY want a French-Revolution style congress to try corporate leaders for execution? We all know how well THAT went. People just started killing each other over petty grudges and shit.
Yes.

Let's get it all out already. In our efforts to be civil and moral, we have propagated twisted bigotry and immorality. We have forgotten why we are civil and moral in the first place: without it we'd all be killing each other. It's inevitable.

Right or wrong, it's just how we are, and things always need to get worse before they get better.
 
Back