View attachment 1531006
edit: just to be clear Natalina is referring to a video that Amber made where she discusses sex with 15-year-old Libby. Make of that what you will, but I’m just laughing over Amber’s response.
Her ignorance really sets me off. How hard is it to Google? She must think she is sounding knowable and being a wonderful powerful woman defending her own honour; but please. I am just being a BEC.
First lets look at her options: defamation, slander, or libel.
Defamation is a false statement presented as a fact that causes injury or damage to the character of the person it is about. Defamation of character happens when something untrue and damaging is presented as a fact to someone else. Making the statement only to the person the statement is about (“Tom, you’re a thief”) is not defamation because it does not damage that person’s character in anyone else’s eyes. Therefore, the person is making the statement to the person and the person replied. Nope not going to happen.
Libel and slander are both types of defamation. Libel is an untrue defamatory statement that is made in writing. Slander is an untrue defamatory statement that is spoken orally. The difference between defamation and slander is that a defamatory statement can be made
in any medium. It could be in a blog comment or spoken in a speech or said on television. Libelous acts only occur when a statement is made in writing (digital statements count as writing) and slanderous statements are only made orally.
This information was taken from this website:
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/differences-between-defamation-slander-and-libel Which I find very straightforward. It does not go in-depth but gives a good overview. Basically Amber would not have a leg to stand on taking the person to court but hey why not pretend threaten people. I am amazed at her stupidity level and it seemingly boundlessness.
For clarification I used the website as no one wants to read a legal rant.