AMD commits violent entry/exit strategy to Metatarsal - Pulling an Intel, the AMD way.

DNA_JACKED

Pronouns are Ni/Gg/Er: proud transracialwomankin
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
So AMD announced their B550 chipset, nearly a year late, to go along with the launch of their new Ryzen 3000 quad core processors. The B550, despite being a year late at this point, still wont launch until june 16th, and seems fairly uneventful except for allowing PCIe 4.0 to the first expansion slot and the first M.2 slot from the CPU. However, the press release did ruffle some feathers, if by ruffle feathers you mean hit a pillow factory with an airstrike. AMD announced their ryzen 4000 series processors would ONLY work with B550 and X570 boards.


Now, why is this a problem? Well, sicne 2017 AMD has been touting one of the big selling points of Socket AM4 and Ryzen was that the socket would be supported through 2020. This was reasonably assumed, based on AMD's past history of supporting motherboards, to mean that socket AM4 motherboards would support newer Ryzen chips, and that in 2021 with the coming of DDR5 memory so would the AM5 chipset. As recently as May of 2019 AMD was still stating support "through" 2020, and was pushing their B450 motherboareds as recently as February for new builds and "ready for future processing demands". Not only customers but OEMs like MSI were caught completely offguard.

Now, this is not the first time that this has been an issue, as X370/B350 did not naively support the 3000 series due to limited motherboard BIOS size and changes to the boost system, but AMD did still supply the AGESA microcode necessary for support so that motherboard OEMs could still implement support if they wished on the boards that could support the chips. Many did this by removing support for the 1000 series if you applied the 3000 series patch, which was fine to most consumers. There was widespread musing that AMD would do the same thing here, but AMD dropped a second bombshell: there would be no, zero, zilch, AGESA microcode for 400 or 300 series chipsets for the 4000 series. This was confirmed by a video from Hardwareunboxed this morning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsBRNck_-wA&t=629s

This means that anyone who bought a high end X370, 470 or midrange B450 motherboard with the intention of buying a ryzen 4000 series late this year is now SOL, they'll need to buy a X570 board for that, which will have no more upgrades available. There are many excuses and rationalizations, with AMD claiming this is caused by the limited size of BIOS ROMs (yet they didnt mandate the use of larger ROMs in their chipset design, hmmmm...) but the general feeling in a significant portion of the consumer base is that this is due to AMD's incompetence and lack of forward planning (something I've been panning them for for YEARS), because the company just announced the 3100 series 8 cores, which make 0 sense in the current market unless you were buying them to tide you over until the 4000 series launched, and they are being bundled with B450 boards that simply cant run 4000 series chips. Companies like MSI being baffled by this announcement further suggests AMD wasnt planning this out and has been bumbling their way through CPU support. This also means that anyone who wants to buy a 4000 series part will be buying into a dead platform, as AM5 comes out in 2021. This would be fine if it was the last in a series of 4 chips, but now it seems that AMD is content in letting all their older customers buy a motherboard for 1 generation of chip and artificially segmenting their older boards in a way worse then intel, which is rather on the nose as AMD has used this forwards compatibility as a selling point since 2017 wiht ryzen 1000, and intel's generational compatibility is well defined every year.
 
Last edited:
I don't feel terrible for these people, shit like this happens pretty regularly on the other side of the street. I bought a 7700k in spring of 2017. 4c/8t was supposed to be the new norm! Now steve from GN is saying that 8c/16t is going to be the minimum and that they're already starting to notice the limitations of 4c on the high end. Intel propping up 5.3ghz like it's going to be a regular thing is also pretty annoying. I want at least a solid 5ghz on all cores, all the time. Stop cock teasing me with this turbo boost shit.
 
Three generations of CPUs being able to run on one chipset with a shared socket is more than Intel have managed in... ever. I think they even sold a chipset for Sandy Bridge that did not support the refresh of that CPU(Ivy Bridge), because that was a budget chipset and fuck you.

And like @CrunkLord420 says, who buys the latest CPU and keep their years old motherboard? Same with RAM.
 
I've never once upgraded a CPU on a motherboard with an existing CPU. I don't know who does this, seems weird unless you're getting something used on the cheap.
It makes sense on modern boards. Outside of NVMe boot support, a z390 motherboard has no features my old Z77 board didnt have. The Z77 has USB 3 and PCIe 3. There's no real reason to replace the motherboard every generation anymore.
Ehh I think the issue is more nuanced. While they did fuck up releasing B550 very late, they aren’t wrong about BIOS ROM size limitations. Gamers Nexus made a good video about it:

ROM limitations doesnt mean they cant release AGESA support for older chipsets like they did with ryzen 3000. Let the motherboard makers handle it. Most of the high end boards are not limited to a 128Mbit ROM, the only thing stopping them from receiving support is AMD not releasing the firmware, and AMD themselves didnt bother to specify a larger ROM chip. That's why that excuse falls flat to many, ROM size doesnt prevent AMD from makign the code available, it reeks of AMD not having the resources and trying to blame it on a third party instead of themselves.
You got a exotic cooler?
You dont need that for a 7700K. I can keep 5.0 GHz on my 9700K with a 120MM AIO, and thats twice the silicon of a 7700k.
 
I've never once upgraded a CPU on a motherboard with an existing CPU. I don't know who does this, seems weird unless you're getting something used on the cheap.


i bought a ab350 with a 1700x and then replaced the 1700x with a 3900. I dont know people are upset. the 3900 works fine stock but its pushing the limit of the b450.
 
Last edited:
i bought a b450 with a 1700x and then replaced the 1700x with a 3900. I dont know people are upset. the 3900 works fine stock but its pushing the limit of the b450.
AMD stated socket AM4 would be supported through 2020, and is now retracting that promise of support, why is it hard for you to understand why this would upset people? What limit of B450 is being pushed that B550 doesnt have, BTW? Chipset has nothing to do with VRM capacity, memory speed, or clock speeds on AM4. It's only limitation is on PCIe 4.0 from the CPU, which is fairly useless right now and will be for the foreseeable future.

The 2700x also works fine stock and pushes some B450 boards to the limit, should they have not gotten 3000 series support as a result?
 
I've never once upgraded a CPU on a motherboard with an existing CPU. I don't know who does this, seems weird unless you're getting something used on the cheap.
I did this because I bought a cheapo LGA1151 CPU in 2015 and upgraded it in 2018 and I'm still using it today. If you've planned on buying an expensive CPU up front and then a whole new computer next time you upgrade, no, it doesn't make sense to switch CPUs. That's probably the cheapest way to do it in the long run, but it doesn't always work out that way.
 
AMD have a vastly better reputation than Intel with these kinds of shenanigans, I'd expect that once they have the resources to build and release new processor AGESA for older chipsets they'd do so. Even if not, their CPUs are +50% better than Intel at half the cost so suck it up, sell your old mobo on ebay get a nice shiny new one and support them for shoving a boot up Intel's lazy monopolistic price-gouging ass.
 
I bought an X470 board Black Friday 2019, so I'm slightly annoyed by this especially since I chose with specifically with larger BIOS capacity. I'm one of those that waits a year or two before CPUs are dirt cheap, like how I bought my Ryzen 7 2700x for $140. So, I'll be pissed about this in 2022. Or I might just buy a 3950x near its end of production by then and not care tbh.
 
AMD have a vastly better reputation than Intel with these kinds of shenanigans, I'd expect that once they have the resources to build and release new processor AGESA for older chipsets they'd do so. Even if not, their CPUs are +50% better than Intel at half the cost so suck it up, sell your old mobo on ebay get a nice shiny new one and support them for shoving a boot up Intel's lazy monopolistic price-gouging ass.
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9600K-vs-Group-/4031vs10 Scroll down the list. By benchmark comparisons the first AMD card doesn't come in until spot 29 and it's twice as expensive as number 4, an Intel CPU.
 
It makes sense on modern boards. Outside of NVMe boot support, a z390 motherboard has no features my old Z77 board didnt have. The Z77 has USB 3 and PCIe 3. There's no real reason to replace the motherboard every generation anymore.

ROM limitations doesnt mean they cant release AGESA support for older chipsets like they did with ryzen 3000. Let the motherboard makers handle it. Most of the high end boards are not limited to a 128Mbit ROM, the only thing stopping them from receiving support is AMD not releasing the firmware, and AMD themselves didnt bother to specify a larger ROM chip. That's why that excuse falls flat to many, ROM size doesnt prevent AMD from makign the code available, it reeks of AMD not having the resources and trying to blame it on a third party instead of themselves.

That argument works if most of the PC market is mostly DIYers, but it isn't. Most of PCs I build are PCs that other people ask me to build. Also, motherboard makers are the ones probably putting in the screws to AMD behind the scenes. I remember a little over a year ago, MSI try to be coy and said B350/450s and X370/470 won't receive updates for 3rd Gen Ryzen, but after community backlash they retracted their statement. Couple of months later when 3rd Gen Ryzen drops, it became a nightmare for most mobo manufacturers to retain all mobo features/UEFI visual elements/ and all CPU lists on 16MB ROM sizes. My X470 board I use no longer supports Raven Ridge & Matisse CPUs after the AGESA update, and I do own a good amount of AM4 boards that no longer support RAID after AGESA 1.0.0.4 as well. That is a nightmare for me when I have customers asking me how to update BIOSES and they think they're slick by not following my advice and they get mad when they can no longer access data on their Hard Drives. And that's on my end, imagine what RMAs the Mobo manufacturers go though for this stuff.
 
The only reason Intel didn't kill socket 1151v2 long ago, is because a properly working 10nm process keeps eluding them and they realized too late that, yes, 2019 2020 is STILL not the year of 10nm on the desktop.
Intel have been doing the tick-tock, on cue, every year, for more than 10 years, and their sockets/chipsets always support only those two generations - except some chipsets support only a subset.
The 300-series only lasted this long because Intel can't execute for shit and failed to launch the 400-series on schedule in October 2019.

And let's be real for a second: When Intel comes out with their 11k-series sometime in 2021, on 14nm, you are likely to see news stories about some Z490 boards having trouble with PCIe4. Most will probably be fixed with BIOS updates. Most.

B450 has everything the budget-conscious consumer wants and PCIe3x16 will not be a bottleneck for years, much less a 3950X.
The impact of the 4000-series will be like Ryzen 1000 > 2000 i.e. not much.
This 'controversy' is about as real as trannies needing gender neutral bathrooms and the people chimping out need to get a grip.
 
Last edited:
Back