Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Eh, I'm just doing it for the experience, mainly. It's easy and unlikely to kill me, so why not give it a shot? If it improves my face, I'll be happy. If it doesn't, then it's not like I lost anything, right?

I hate sluts for a multitude of reasons.

*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate
*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society
*They have destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment. This is unfair to the children.

These three things will lead to the collapse of society as we know it unless we return to traditional ways. I don't know what is with everyone these days who thinks they are somehow above the wisdom of earlier generations. "Old ways are archaic and outdated! We need to change the way we run society with things that are unprecedented because it's PROGRESSIVE!" That attitude is incredibly arrogant. People of earlier generations were not idiots. They did things the way they did for a reason: because they worked throughout history. Changing things up is a recipe for disaster. "Progressives" such as sluts and social justice liberals are showing an immense disrespect for their ancestors.

Absolutely! Your three reasons are the reasons why the Western World will collapse! The liberal media is lying to us and Feminism IS the death of America! BENGHAZI! GAMERGATE! ANTI-FEMINISM! blargggggh!

^ That's what you sound like, a fucking idiot.
 
*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate

Why don't you provide us with a timestamped picture of yourself so that we may bask in the radiant glow of your your genetic superiority? Until then I can only assume that like Holden you kind of look like this.

latest
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The person who runs that site is a Nazi. Literally. I got this from Stormfront:
View attachment 20202

Sorry, but any 'science' involving white supremacists is going to end up being bullshit.
I'll further note that legitimate physical anthropology types don't use Nazi anthropometrics for a reason, and it's not because the data qua data are necessarily biased or flawed. Rather, it's the fruit of a poisoned tree.

If one is the kind of person who can't keep their hands off Nazi data in order to prove their pet point, one is also likely to be the kind of person who fakes data to prove their pet point. These are the kind of people who get weeded out of academia and start posting crazy-ass shit on messageboards.

@Amud , buddy, an application of Bayes Rule suggests your burden of proof on this stuff is really high.
 
...I hate sluts for a multitude of reasons.

*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate

So let me get this straight,the thought of a world full of sociopathic men with low IQs bothers you so much... that it makes you hate women.
Oops, I mean women. WAIT I MEAN SLUTS.

*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society

And yet contributions to society don't seem to be slowing down any. Live-saving medicines and technologies and fancy new stuff keep showing up, so all these most capable men are still contributing, despite the abundance of sluts.

How exactly did those naughty sluts "create that climate", again?

*They have destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment. This is unfair to the children.

Even before divorce and single parenthood became socially acceptable, there were loads of kids growing up in "suboptimal" enviroments. Kids being raised in poverty, kids being raised by abusers, kids being raised without being given any opportunities to succeed. If you really care that much about bettering the living situations of children in high-risk environments, you'd do a lot better to set your sights on poverty and economic inequality instead of women's lib. Hell, you'd do better by fighting for economic equality for women, because there will always be women who chose single parenthood (or are forced into it due to circumstances beyond their control), and giving them opportunities to better their lives means bettering the lives of their children too.

As an aside, if you compare the rates of child mortality today to the rates of child mortality even fifty years ago, this is the most optimal time to grow up simply because this is the time you're least likely to die from some horrible preventable thing. Like, sure, you might grow up in broken home, but at least you don't have to worry about dying from polio.
 
Alright, so I gave @Amud his own thread and moved all the posts about him from the SlutHate threads here.
Please use such for further discussion of the Balloon Loon himself and the SlutHate thread for more general discussion of his favorite site.

Currently waiting on some kind of evidence that can confirm Amud's identity to get him the renown verified status.
 
Hi, @Amud ! I genuinely love this stuff, and I wish you liked the peer-reviewed literature more, so we could have journal club. I do have a few questions, just so I can make sure I'm following you:

What do you mean by "genetic degradation?"
What do you mean by "our species?"
Under ideal conditions - however you'd like to define them - what would the most capable of men contribute to society? The most capable of women?
What is the optimal environment for raising children?

I take it you've read the material I linked. That should give you enough background to fully understand my explanations. If there is anything you still don't understand in my posts here or on The Apricity, don't hesitate to ask.

1. Genetic degradation refers to the trend of lower-quality people (low intelligence, ignobility, psychopathy, criminality, amygdala dysfunction, r-selection, etc.) reproducing at a drastically higher rate than people of higher quality. The result is a gradual replacement of higher-quality genes with lower-quality ones.

2. "Our species" = humans. Homo Sapiens. A good example of genetic degradation was the transition from Homo neanderthalensis to Homo sapiens.

3. What we need is an environment that fosters productivity of capable but downtrodden individuals. Where financiers don't fuck us over. Where we can expect to have a solid family. Where we can be educated for free. Where the income scale is meritocratic. Where our culture doesn't involve degenerate sexual videos and dating apps.
 
What exactly do you mean by "degenerate sexual videos and apps"?
Also (again, strange question, but serious), what's your opinion of Guatemalans?

I'm talking about Tinder, Nicki Minaj videos, etc.

I don't know any Guatemalans and do not know enough about them to make any sort of judgement.

No one and I mean no one is going to take bullshit from white supremacist sites seriously. Either give us some scientifically valid sources or admit you're full of shit.

1. As I explained earlier, TA is not a white supremacist site. There are people of all races there. Only a minority of the userbase (of which I am not a part) has white supremacist views.

2. The information I linked was created and posted by myself. It doesn't matter what site I post it on. The point is, I came up with it. Maybe you should decide whether it is legit or not based on your own reading of it, rather than the connotation of the website it is posted on. Also, the idea of "Scientifically valid sources" is completely meaningless. There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.
 
I'm talking about Tinder, Nicki Minaj videos, etc.

I don't know any Guatemalans and do not know enough about them to make any sort of judgement.



1. As I explained earlier, TA is not a white supremacist site. There are people of all races there. Only a minority of the userbase (of which I am not a part) has white supremacist views.

2. The information I linked was created and posted by myself. It doesn't matter what site I post it on. The point is, I came up with it. Maybe you should decide whether it is legit or not based on your own reading of it, rather than the connotation of the website it is posted on. Also, the idea of "Scientifically valid sources" is completely meaningless. There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.



why are you in community college if you are such a genius?
 
I'm talking about Tinder, Nicki Minaj videos, etc.
There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year

Stop thinking everything is shit, dude. You're choosing the worst possible examples of current creation and mixing them with useless rhetoric. Take a deep breath. Go take a walk. Stop thinking. Be happy for once.

If not, fuck you.
 
There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.
On what basis do you decry the superior legitimacy/rigorous standards of professional credentials and testing? If in fact a professional opinion and a non-professional opinion is to be taken in equal measure, you surely can provide a reasoned argument as to why this is so, rather than expecting us to take you at your word.
 
Back