Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[seagull]

@Amud Here's a diagram that includes the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Homo. If you google for it, you will see similar and simplified trees. None of them support your conclusion that Homo sapiens descended from Homo neanderthalensis.

It is believed that humans bred with neanderthals. I think this is a newer idea so you might not have heard about it yet, but I was saying this before it was cool.

I knew that, but thanks.

 

[KillerBob]

It's simple. White people are people who have their origins in Europe. Black people are people who have their origins in Sub-Saharan Africa. The definition is far from perfect, and you're right that genetics are complicated, but we can reasonably divide people into groups based on geographical origin.

.

Sorry to be a dreadful pedant, but you do realise that all Homo sapiens have their origin in African right? We used to think that what you would term 'white people' may have independantly evolved from some other Homo species in Europe itself but thats not true. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC41400/pdf/pnas01491-0076.pdf

It's been said already but it bears repeating: WE DID NOT EVOLVE FROM NEADERTHALS.

To a certain extent you can divide people by geographic origin but not nessesarily meaningful genetically. So what would be the point?

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Can you pinpoint where the "replacement out of Africa" occurred? Because I sure can't. I see a continuous gradient of changing skeletal characteristics. They're always telling us humans came out of Africa, but I'm not seeing a sharp change in the phenotype of Europeans from "Neanderthal" to "Human" that would correspond with this migration.

I can't tell either because I'm a nonexpert looking at pictures of a bunch of fucking skulls.

 

[Amud]

Yo @Amud I keep asking stuff and you keep ignoring me

• What about communities who have suffered massively from having no outside breeding at all, for example, Amish folk?
• Do you believe you possess genetic traits that would benefit humanity
• Are you aware of the fact that shoving things that far into your nasal passages is not only hilariously dumb but actually dangerous? There's a reason parents take their kids to hospital when they stick Legos up their noses. [EDIT: Based on the fact that no actual doctor would practise this, I assume that you're doing this in your bathroom at home, too.]
• I gotta ask. Are you a virgin or otherwise currently Incel?

1. It's unfortunate. The Amish, Jews, or pedigree dogs are not comparable to broadly defined races, because they are much smaller populations. There is enough genetic diversity within populations like "white" or "black" to avoid the creating of problems like Tay-Sachs disease.
2. Yes
3. No, I'm not aware of the fact.
4. Yes

 

[ILoveMylarBalloons]

50,000 year old European

30,000 year old European:

25,000 year old European:

18,000 year old European:

10,000 year old European:

7,000 year old European:

2,000 year old European:

Europeans today:

Can you pinpoint where the "replacement out of Africa" occurred? Because I sure can't. I see a continuous gradient of changing skeletal characteristics. They're always telling us humans came out of Africa, but I'm not seeing a sharp change in the phenotype of Europeans from "Neanderthal" to "Human" that would correspond with this migration.

whats so interesting about europe and europeans? are you european? besides gabber music and other EDM from europe from the 90's and early 2000's theres not that much special about europe. America and Canada and New Zealand are more interesting and yes a 50.000 year old body is rare...

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Maybe you didn't descend from Neanderthals, but I sure as hell did. If you actually examine the fossil record, you can clearly see a smooth, continuous gradient going from pure Neanderthal to Neolithic farmer gracilized microcephalic Adenid over the past 50,000 years or so.

Have you ever examined the fossil record? No? Didn't think so.

 

[Vitriol]

the relationship between wives and husbands? Should women be subject to men? Is marital rape possible? Is interracial marriage OK? Should a woman have a say in who she marries?

1. I don't get this question. I hope husbands and wives have a positive, loving relationship.
2. I think the more rational and capable party should take a leadership position, whichever party that may be.
3. If a husband violently forces himself on his wife without her consent, then I would consider it to be rape.
4. I'd prefer to not have interracial marriages, but if people want to do that then I guess it's their prerogative.
5. Yes

Thank you for answering.

Others have covered the issues with your answer to no.4 so i won't.

Instead id like to query your answer to 5.

If women have a choice in who they marry then surely the burden is on you to convince them you are a good choice?

People in reality are not all that shallow, if you genuinely were better than mr thundercock you would get more positive female attention. I'm afraid the only person that can be blamed for your failure in love is yourself. I realise this will not be a pleasant thought but if you think it through the logic is sound. Provided you believe women are as intelligent as men.

Would be interested in hearing your thoughts?

Also as far as racial purity goes- its way overrated i was born into the british gentry and the results, even several generations down the line, of the chronic inbreeding of the 18/19th century is still causing health issues today. Some of these problems can be dealt with with wealth (crooked teeth, bad eyes, bad hearing) but others like hemophilia and diabetes are harder to deal with. It would be utter foolishness for me to marry within my class and cultural sphere and your model is likely eventually lead to the same issue, after all how much more worthy of preservation is culture than race?

Edit: for clarity i dont have any health issues that braces or lasers didn't fix but the potential is there and many cousins aren't so lucky.

 

[Atsimuel]

All of those (with the possible exception of potatid) would make great band names.

 

[Amud]

I just noticed that my post with the skulls was tagged as "autistic". Don't you think that is offensive to people with real autism? It's not funny to make fun of healthy people like me at the expense of the disabled.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

@Amud, Do you believe you possess genetic traits that would benefit humanity?

Yes

What traits would those be? It's certainly not your intelligence; you're as dumb as a pile of bricks.

[EDIT]

It's not funny to make fun of healthy people like me at the expense of the disabled.

You're crazy enough to stick balloons up your nose in an effort to change the shape of your skull. There is nothing healthy about you.

 

[Wolf Fetuses]

No, I'm not aware of the fact.

Okay, so are you going to stop doing it?

 

[ILoveMylarBalloons]

I just noticed that my post with the skulls was tagged as "autistic". Don't you think that is offensive to people with real autism? It's not funny to make fun of healthy people like me at the expense of the disabled.

for once I agree with you! I am tired of people makes fun of autism.

 

[MerriedManJr]

Skullz

Pherenology was retarded in the 1800s and it's retarded today. Unless you're just showing off cool skull pics, which would be prete sik. Ru in da skullz?

 

[Wolf Fetuses]

for once I agree with you! I am tired of people makes fun of autism.

You must be new. Or a troll, not sure.

 

[dabluearmedbandit]

You do know that the definition of White is ever changing for instance in most Anglophone nations a hundred years ago most people from Ireland, Italy, Poland, and many other European nations were not considered white. The term white or any other term for a race is a an ever changing definition that changes with culture and in society race is nothing more than a social construct.

This. My family is Italian. 1000 years ago, we were the pure ones and all you civilized Europeans were filthy barbarians. 100 years ago we were the filthy Wops and you were the pure ones. Race and Cultural identity and heritage change throughout time, as does the rest of the world's perception of it.

And honestly, practically everyone is mixed already, somewhere in their family history. Maybe the reason girls don't like you is because you aren't as pure as you think?

 

[EI 903]

You must be new. Or a troll, not sure.

Neither. He's this guy: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mylarballoonfan.442/

 

[Ariel]

Why is psuedoscience such a large part of your belief system and that of all loveshies?

Also Samuel, high five!

 

[KillerBob]

50,000 year old European

30,000 year old European:

25,000 year old European:

18,000 year old European:

10,000 year old European:

7,000 year old European:

2,000 year old European:

Europeans today:

Can you pinpoint where the "replacement out of Africa" occurred? Because I sure can't. I see a continuous gradient of changing skeletal characteristics. They're always telling us humans came out of Africa, but I'm not seeing a sharp change in the phenotype of Europeans from "Neanderthal" to "Human" that would correspond with this migration.

1. Where is the source for these images? I would like to be sure that you've dated these skulls correctly.
2. These images are pretty much worthless for doing any kind of evolutionary ordination analysis without scale bars.
3. You are nowhere near qualified to make an assesement of the changing shape of these skulls over evolutionary time. I'm not qualified either, this is the sort of subject that requires computer programs and a metric shitton of statistics to do properly.

 

[Amud]

Pherenology was retarded in the 1800s and it's retarded today. Unless you're just showing off cool skull pics, which would be prete sik. Ru in da skullz?

What does my post have anything to do with phrenology?

If we aren't descended from Neanderthals and there was indeed a migration out of Africa in which "humans" replaced Neanderthals, then if we look at the fossil record, we would see that up until whatever time the migration occurred, the people were Neanderthal, then after the migration occurred, there was a sharp transition such that the people had modern "human" phenotypes. I just showed you the fossil record and as we can see, there is no such sharp transition. Each successive skull I showed is less Neanderthal and more "human" than the previous one, with no major jumps that would indicate a mass population replacement with a different species.

Why does everyone keep calling me "love shy"? I have never once identified with the term.

 

[CatParty]

Why does everyone keep calling me "love shy"? I have never once identified with the term.

do you get laid?