Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[JU 199]

My ideas are what they are

They're exceptionally poor. I suggest you go find an economics textbook.... and some IRL hobbies other than sticking shit up your nose.

 

[Dudeofteenage]

I don't have a good way of explaining or articulating my ideas

While this is unquestionably true, I think the problem runs a bit deeper than that

 

[dabluearmedbandit]

In my society, Justin Bieber would be executed rather than being given hundreds of millions.

Spoiler

I am also starting to doubt how legit Amud is. We need pics, blank out your eyes or something if you don't trust us.

Edit: He beat me to it, good boy.

 

[Wally Balljacker]

I just have one question. What the hell is an ignobilid?

I'm wondering if the root word for that is supposed to be ignoble.

Although by that logic, it raises further questions about "slayerid"

 

[Chan the Wizard]

Ok, here's my picture:

Ok, I'm gonna be honest here. I've never read the Communist Manifesto. All I know about economics is what I learned in the high school econ class, which I got a C in. That means I don't have a good way of explaining or articulating my ideas, nor do I have a good way of classifying them into categories like "communism", "fascist authoritarianism", etc. My ideas are what they are.

Well. I retract my comment. Apparently this is for real or a really dedicated troll. Either way, this guy really shoves balloons up his nose.

Edit uploading the photo in case it disappears.

 

[For The Internet]

Personally, I like the part where he implied psychopaths a) make up a large portion of the population and b) have low IQs.

Oh, and also the "ignobilid" part. I've been studying human evolution (primarily ancient hominins) at university for years and I have no idea what the fuck he's talking about.

The rest is just blah blah I hate sluts because they ignore me bullshit.

 

[Dreamatorium]

All I know about economics is what I learned in the high school econ class, which I got a C in. That means I don't have a good way of explaining or articulating my ideas

"I have literally no idea what I'm talking about but you should have no problem with me saying that people who I don't like should be put to death"

 

[Ca Ira]

In my society, Justin Bieber would be executed rather than being given hundreds of millions.

On what grounds would you have Bieber executed? I agree that he sucks, of course, but I also don't see that his physical existence poses such a threat to society that he must be killed.

 

[JU 199]

On what grounds would you have Bieber executed? I agree that he sucks, of course, but I also don't see that his physical existence poses such a threat to society that he must be killed.

Fanatical Bieber hatred is a secondary symptom of lolcowitis

 

[Linako 2.0]

Justin Bieber would be executed rather than being given hundreds of millions.

Who?

 

[dabluearmedbandit]

On what grounds would you have Bieber executed? I agree that he sucks, of course, but I also don't see that his physical existence poses such a threat to society that he must be killed.

He's a MALE JERK who's taking away all the sweethearts, obviously.

 

[Lalala]

On what grounds would you have Bieber executed? I agree that he sucks, of course, but I also don't see that his physical existence poses such a threat to society that he must be killed.

This is what bugs me about his system, why is it when people design these 'Utopias' they never take art, music or general entertainment into consideration as contributing to society? While I hate biebers music and think he's generally a twat there are thousands out there who legit like his music. Why should them being entertained and being allowed to indulge in a little escapism with the music of their choice be considered unhelpful to society? You want people to follow your rules the first step is to keep them happy and putting someone to death that they all enjoy just because he's not to your tastes sounds like a shit way to start.

 

[Amud]

If you talk so much about other people being leach @Amud.
Do you depend on a tugboat or live with your parents without a good reason for it?
Do you use your own funds to go to commuinty collage?

There's a difference between depending on your parents (like, you know, all young people do unless they are orphans) and being a greedy banker who steals billions of dollars from the populace.

No, you meant communism. Otherwise You don't understand how an economy functions.

Banks are sources of capital. Without some form of that apparatus you wouldn't be able to get cheap credit. No credit= no large economy.

So either your advocating communism or you want a return to medieval barter.

Why can't we just trade gold coins?

Well the whole point isn't the cost or the paper, it's what you put in. You spent 4 years looking at the theories and their evidence and why they're the leading ones, so you're up to date with the development in your field. Honestly, if your ideas were so great, why wouldn't a journal look at them and say "hey these are credible, let's publish them!". They have literally nothing to lose.

Also, a deed to a house is just a 300k homemagicalz paper according to that logic. You're completely ignoring that people earn the right to a respectable degree/deed through hard work, whether it be a job or studies.

You spent 4 years looking at evidence that was told to you by scienmagists

Along these lines of social theory I have to ask the following question about sluts;
Would you, @Amud , say you agree with Bordieaus theory of habitus, aka the concept that the key components of a persons identity and therefore the way they conduct themselves is due to the culture they associate most closely with, be it their hometown, a social group, a sub culture etc, and therefore the key to your 'slut' problem is to change the sociological environment in which women are raised to better suit the traditional lifestyle you incels all seem to crave? Or are you in the camp that sexual promiscuity is a genetic trait in women, hence your claim that rising testosterone levels are the reason so many 'sluts' are around lately.
Also don't inflate a condom in your nose, that's just silly.

1. I think it's a combination of the two. Genetics probably play a greater role in personality, but of course a person's identity is partly shaped by the world around them, the people they associate with, and so on.
2. It's not a condom, it's a finger cot.

I just have one question. What the hell is an ignobilid?

I will provide you with some reading material.

Note that the forum I'm linking to has a lot of advertisements, so I would suggest installing Adblock if you have not done so already.

1. An explanation of the various forms of "nobilid" features: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ich-phenotypes-contribute-the-most-to-society

2. An explanation of the damaged psychological state resulting from environmental and genetic deterioration: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?164029-SUBHUMAN-SYNDROME

3. A gallery of various Ignobilid phenotypes, arranged into five categories: www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?161569-New-racial-classification-schema

4. A handy reference chart to accompany (3.)

And here's the "silly" reference chart:

I'm wondering if the root word for that is supposed to be ignoble.

Although by that logic, it raises further questions about "slayerid"

You're absolutely correct. The root word of Ignobilid is, in fact, ignoble. The root word of Slayerid is slayer. A Slayer is similar to a Chad. It is a man who is able to obtain casual sex. Men who are able to obtain casual sex with above average-looking women resemble the Slayerid phenotype, since that is the phenotype most desired by women. We have a female poster here who inadvertently proved this by claiming that the Slayerid image was "hot" and that she wanted to "have his babies". An Adenid could never obtain casual sex.

 

[Meowthkip]

Ok, here's my picture:

Ok, I'm gonna be honest here. I've never read the Communist Manifesto. All I know about economics is what I learned in the high school econ class, which I got a C in. That means I don't have a good way of explaining or articulating my ideas, nor do I have a good way of classifying them into categories like "communism", "fascist authoritarianism", etc. My ideas are what they are.

How does it feel when you inflate that thing in your sinuses?

I imagine it would be uncomfortable.

 

[JU 199]

Why can't we just trade gold coins?

Because its retarded. That's why.

Edit: more evidence that you want a medieval economy. @Amud Why do you hate modernity?

 

[seagull]

They determine DNA similarity using a PCA plot, or principle component analysis. When examining large amounts of data, the result is a set of vectors with incredibly high dimension. The calculations required to determine the distances between these vectors would be impossible to do because they are so long and complicated. Instead, they use PCA to "project" this data onto a field of smaller dimensions. When the PCA analysis is performed, they break it up into "principle components" which roughly correspond to real-life factors which influence the data. In real life, there's only one factor which has to do with the closeness between modern Euros and Neanderthals. This will be ONE of the principle components, out of a number potentially as large as the number of DNA sequences measured. When they show DNA charts, they are only looking at two principle components, since paper or charts are 2 dimensional. This means the principle component which would tell us how close or far we are to Neanderthals might not even be included in the chart.

This is interesting information, but can you please present me with a source that backs up your claim that this is an unreliable way to analyze DNA? Because the difference between the mitochondrial DNA in humans and neanderthals is so great that it appears that they never shared any mitochondrial DNA, which would be an impossibility if your claims were true. Finally, to solidify the scientific evidence of the amount of variation, there have also been comparisons of ribosomal DNA as well.
I'll quote my source so that everyone else will know exactly what it is that you are arguing against.

Using this mtDNA information, the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans dates to approximately 550,000 to 690,000 years ago, which is about four times older than the modern human mtDNA pool. This is consistent with the idea that Neanderthals did not contribute substantially to modern human genome.

In comparison, modern humans have only existed for 200,000 years. That means not only did the Neanderthal lineage branch off long before humans ever existed, there was additional evolution that took place after that last common ancestor. Humans also had a change in skull shape over time, from the point in time where they became distinct from Homo erectus, which alone is enough to show similarities with the skull shape of the Neanderthals. Just because things look alike does not mean the that they are related (see: echidnas and hedgehogs for an exaggerated example).

But I'm honestly done with this until you can start coming up with sources to support your arguments.

 

[Dreamatorium]

There's a difference between depending on your parents (like, you know, all young people do unless they are orphans) and being a greedy banker who steals billions of dollars from the populace.



Why can't we just trade gold coins?




You spent 4 years looking at evidence that was told to you by scienmagists



1. I think it's a combination of the two. Genetics probably play a greater role in personality, but of course a person's identity is partly shaped by the world around them, the people they associate with, and so on.
2. It's not a condom, it's a finger cot.



I will provide you with some reading material.

Note that the forum I'm linking to has a lot of advertisements, so I would suggest installing Adblock if you have not done so already.

1. An explanation of the various forms of "nobilid" features: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ich-phenotypes-contribute-the-most-to-society

2. An explanation of the damaged psychological state resulting from environmental and genetic deterioration: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?164029-SUBHUMAN-SYNDROME

3. A gallery of various Ignobilid phenotypes, arranged into five categories: www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?161569-New-racial-classification-schema

4. A handy reference chart to accompany (3.)

And here's the "silly" reference chart:

Elaborate troll or legitimately out of your fucking mind. "Scienmagists"? I need a drink.

 

[Squealer]

Slut hate blablah.

Probably already touched upon, but what is attractive about a man who shoves condoms up his nose?

 

[ON 190]

Why can't we just trade gold coins?

Fuck off. dogecoins are seriously the future.

Ok, here's my picture:

Okay, that's seriously scary, there, broheim. Though I wonder... is there meth in that?!

 

[Vitriol]

Why can't we just trade gold coins?

I know some sciencmagists who could tell you, but if you scraped a pass at highschool economics i doubt you'd understand.

You spent 4 years looking at evidence that was told to you by scienmagists

Evidence which had been scrutinised by their peers and they could replicate and prove. Your laughable research would be rejected because it is provably wrong.