Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[autisticdragonkin]

It's not something I normally listen to, but there have been a few occasions when I found myself enjoying rap that I was hearing. Some rappers have really impressed me with their vocal dexterity and word-smithing skill.



Why do I have to measure them? I've seen plenty of articles that include measurements of these skulls.



Ignobilid, for the most part



Are you advocating that I be forced to take synthetic drugs? That is reprehensible. Keep in mind that I am a functioning member of society and am not disabled in any way.



Hell no. She is a Borreby, and quite Ignobilid. She is also one of the sort of people who I would have executed.

I am wondering how you came up with your theories

 

[Bigguy28]

I am wondering how you came up with your theories

Same way most people like him do, insert hand between buttocks and pull firmly.

 

[seagull]

I don't have the time to come up with a length explanation and there's to point in reinventing the wheel, so I'm just going to post this link to a thread where a friendly poster has compiled a big list of evidence that argues against the Out of Africa theory. For the record, I'm not totally convinced. I lean more to the side of the Multiregional model, but I am still more or less agnostic on the matter.
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?162942-Skulgrimen-checking-in

Look for the post by "Prisoner of Ice"

Just thought it was kind of funny that that link took me to a blog which also has phylogenetic trees that disagree with your claim that humans were descended from Neanderthals.

Spoiler: These are remarkably similar to the one I already posted

Edit for a typo.

 

[Meowthkip]

It's not something I normally listen to, but there have been a few occasions when I found myself enjoying rap that I was hearing. Some rappers have really impressed me with their vocal dexterity and word-smithing skill.

So...

What's your top five, then?

 

[Wally Balljacker]

Sounds like you don't know about Richard Feynman.

Wait, wasn't Benjamin Franklin a total "Chad" as well?

 

[Positron]

I like Classical music from all eras.

You have any idea how Chaddish Listz, Wagner and Debussy were?

Identical twin studies

Then cite an identical-twin study that shows how "genetic intelligence" has been decreasing while "environmental intelligence" goes the other way.

 

[KingGeedorah]

So...

What's your top five, then?

Easy man; Dylan, Dylan, Dylan, Dylan and Dylan.

 

[Ca Ira]

Hell no. [Gina Rinehart] is a Borreby, and quite Ignobilid. She is also one of the sort of people who I would have executed.

Now we're starting to find some common ground.

 

[TM Ambrose]

I don't have the time to come up with a length explanation and there's to point in reinventing the wheel, so I'm just going to post this link to a thread where a friendly poster has compiled a big list of evidence that argues against the Out of Africa theory. For the record, I'm not totally convinced. I lean more to the side of the Multiregional model, but I am still more or less agnostic on the matter.
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?162942-Skulgrimen-checking-in

Hi, biologist again. This person says that the out of africa theory is wrong because of chromosomal DNA, but in the experiment mitochondrial DNA is used. While his post is fine in what it's saying he at one point refers to DNA evidence as a thing that we have for ancient hominids. I don't think this person actually understands the science behind what he's reading to actually interpret it, and I don't think you should be using him as a source. Scientific articles with this information can be found on NCBI for free if you ever have the time. While not every journal will be completely free abstracts are normally available which give the general gist of what the article is saying. I don't really know much about hominid skulls except the general type but a lot of the stuff he's posting isn't from scientific articles, and if you can't find an article for it I'm just going to presume bias or an unreliable source.

 

[Conrix]

Eh, I'm just doing it for the experience, mainly. It's easy and unlikely to kill me, so why not give it a shot? If it improves my face, I'll be happy. If it doesn't, then it's not like I lost anything, right?

I hate sluts for a multitude of reasons.

*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate
*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society
*They have destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment. This is unfair to the children.

These three things will lead to the collapse of society as we know it unless we return to traditional ways. I don't know what is with everyone these days who thinks they are somehow above the wisdom of earlier generations. "Old ways are archaic and outdated! We need to change the way we run society with things that are unprecedented because it's PROGRESSIVE!" That attitude is incredibly arrogant. People of earlier generations were not idiots. They did things the way they did for a reason: because they worked throughout history. Changing things up is a recipe for disaster. "Progressives" such as sluts and social justice liberals are showing an immense disrespect for their ancestors.

Holy shit, second time reading @Amud's OP and you sir, are Fuckbot 2.0.

*We repeatedly asked you and your ilk to cite sources on that, bro.
*People who are more capable than you have gotten laid easier; try harder.
*Children have been more "sub-optimal" at least 100 years ago.

We change our ways because improved technology allows us to change our ways. Back in the days you're probably harping about, more people (read: all of the men, women sometimes) actually had to go out and do hard labor to earn a living, these days any lazy faggot can do a job online or at least on a computer. People seriously don't need access to a vagina to be productive. Also Ignobilid sets off my spell checker, try harder faggot.

 

[Osaka Seafood Concern]

Hell no. She is a Borreby, and quite Ignobilid. She is also one of the sort of people who I would have executed.

By what standards are you judging someone as being nobilid/ignobilid? Gina Rinehart is pretty much one of the most highest ranking people in the world due to her net worth. Nobility has always been tied to high wealth and "good breeding", although I scoff at that concept because many people of nobility and especially royal heritage have significant traces of incest in their bloodlines resulting in "ignobilid" looking birth defects.

I only push you to elaborate because I actually have trouble finding any research into this as a legitimate term (excepting some rogue posts on Stormfront, but I don't know you and I don't know what you're supposed to be representing so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not draw any assumptions that you would be connected to a white supremacist website).

Also editing because you didn't address my original question either. Define to me what is an "actively destructive" person.

 

[Ca Ira]

Holy shit, second time reading @Amud's OP and you sir, are Fuckbot 2.0.

We change our ways because improved technology allows us to change our ways. Also Ignobilid sets off my spell checker, try harder faggot.

I put it to you that Tommy Wiseau defies the nobilid/ignobilid classification system.

 

[Carbink]

Wait, wasn't Benjamin Franklin a total "Chad" as well?

Beethoven too. That guy was a "known associate" of prostitutes.

 

[TM Ambrose]

Ignobilid, for the most part

So I just looked up this word and only you come up..... Nothing really scientific. Also Bratz dolls don't have prominent noses (they're faces are flat) or any indication that they have a traditional skull, especially since they don't seem to have a terminal indent behind the eye sockets (which they also seem to lack) making them anapsid. They also have diamond shape eye sockets which.... don't exists in humans.

 

[TM Ambrose]

Also I'd like to point out that interbreeding is pretty well known in population genetics to increase survival rates in populations because it creates more recombinants than pure breeding.

 

[SpessCaptain]

What type of skull is this @Amud ?

I think it's a subspecies of a Downie.

 

[4Macie]

@Amud you still haven't told us why you think humans can beat the scientific fact that purebreds have way more health issues than "mutts". It's literally shown in every single animal breed. Purebreds have the hardest time conceiving and carrying babies, they have crazy health issues, they die young, they die painfully, and they overall just hate life because they are usually mentally unstable or mentally retarded. Why are humans able to "beat these odds"? I ask because we all know you feel that intermating between different races shouldn't happen.

The information I linked was created and posted by myself. It doesn't matter what site I post it on. The point is, I came up with it. Maybe you should decide whether it is legit or not based on your own reading of it, rather than the connotation of the website it is posted on. Also, the idea of "Scientifically valid sources" is completely meaningless. There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.

So you literally came up with this "theory" and all the "evidence" yourself? That explains a lot...
As I've said before, you seem to take whatever you can use, and you use it... and then if anything disproves you, you disregard it because it might hurt your "theory". You have yet to try and find these certain neanderthal skull types where the person is stupid as fuck. You only use the ones where a genius has come out of it. You look at people with "normal" or "non neanderthal" skulls who are geniuses and say "well they do have SOME (special skull type) characteristics...so that explains it". Like wtf?

Your "theory" has literally no backing to it. None what-so-ever. It sucks.

I think women should learn to appreciate me more. I've already done my part of the burden by contributing so much to our body of scientific knowledge.

So you feel entitled? That's nothing new for incels. We have another on this site who feels the same way, maybe you should go be friends with him. His name on these forums is Holden. Bet you guys would be reeeeeal good friends.

Also, you've literally contributed NOTHING to the body of scientific knowledge. Women see this and so are repulsed by you.

Because if I'm incel for my whole life, maybe I won't have the motivation to continue the great work I do. I've barely even scratched the surface of it in this thread.

Keep him incel guys and gals. Speaking of incels though... @Amud what's your definition of incel exactly? We have Holden's definition... but his is kinda wonky and I don't feel it's stagnant... it changes daily. Do you have the 6 months of no sex or relationship requirement?
Oh! Another question.... do you think women want to be raped and love and adore rapists? Do you feel a western woman wants nothing more than to have her spine broken and her teeth bashed in on the curb of some street??

Girls care more about looks than guys do. Lots of Adenid women are considered attractive, but Adenid men are wanted dead in the eyes of women.

Pretty sure guys care about looks just as much as women do. That's why so many women have body issues. Women see that men go after the slim attractive girl more than the mousy overweight girl. I do, however, like how you think you know what women want and whom women want dead. It's similar to another man we have here on the forums... goes by Holden, maybe you've heard of him. You guys should hook up and give these forums a loveshy/incel lolcalf for us to raise.

 

[TM Ambrose]

There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.

Well actually there is a reason to trust academic authorities. They know more about the subject than you and know more epistemology behind the subject. This argument is used a lot by people that think they actually know the subject but believe a theory is equivalent to a guess, and that a law is above a theory. Also competing synthesis of ideas can exists until further data can be reported or derived (such as M theory). By saying that data that goes against yours is dishonest is proving you to be academically dishonest and shows a lack of integrity in your work. A scientist who believes in his work should be able to stand by it based on the works merits. Darwin didn't try to convince Richard Owens that he was correct on change over time.

 

[Splendid]

Give this guy, MylarBaloonFan, and Holden their own subforum to post in. It'll be like a zoo: we can look, but not touch.

 

[Eddy84]

You never answered question, amud. I read on sluthate and the other forum that you are diagnosed with autism. Is that true?