- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
This woman was clearly sexually abused by a close family member, likely for years. Growing up in that sort of situation can have some strange effects on the mind, especially when it starts early and involves a lot of emotional manipulation. The worst cases are always the ones who never confront it properly and grow up warped around it with the trauma buried far too deep to ever acknowledge the damage, much less undo it. Like trying to hide a body in the walls of a house, if you need an analogy: you can spray all the disinfectant you want, and wash your hands a million times, and cover over the wallpaper again and again, but it's still going to rot and bubble and smell in there.
Now, I'm not going to say it's necessarily incriminating that there are photos of her in a swimsuit as a child, to a certain point. In fact, plenty of parents take innocuous "baby's first bath" pictures where their baby/toddler is technically nude, but this isn't generally considered pornography by rational human beings because it's not the nudity that's central to the image. "I know it when I see it" is a pretty good rule of thumb for this kind of thing unless you're fucked in the head; the first issue with it is that some people are prudish and think non-sexual nudity is the same as porn, and the second is that normal human beings don't want to go through pictures of children naked to figure out if they 'count' as pornography or not.
tl;dr it's a weird grey area.
Some cunts try to slip softcore CP through the filters by claiming it's 'art' if there's no alleged abuse in it (i.e. Cuties). Spoiler: Cuties is not art. It's gross preteen twerking shit for fat lazy arthouse chomos who are too special and euphoric to just use Tor and get arrested in a CP sting by the fucking FBI like the lower class filth crawling around them.
While taking pics of your kids at the beach and other places it's appropriate to wear a swimsuit is a normal and healthy family activity, it does start to get weird when people take pictures of their children wearing swimsuits/other revealing attire that doesn't really fit the location/context. It gets even more suspicious if they're doing strange poses, and especially so if these poses are obviously meant to evoke erotic sensations.
In fact, this sort of thing can even be considered child pornography under some lenses where simply having a photograph of a naked toddler in a bath or a child splashing around in a bikini suit at the pool would fail the test. The key reason is that pornography, generally, is intentionally erotic even if it's not explicit.
There have been cases testing things like photography of children in nudist colonies (this was a thing in the 1970s, I think?) and even those baby bath-time photos I mentioned earlier. Generally it seems to be agreed upon that the intent and focus choices of the photographer are highly relevant in such cases, at least as much as the content itself. This is why, when you see pictures of naked starving children in Africa, it is not considered pornography: the intent was to document a disaster, not to make erotica.
It's all more intricate than that, but that is a brief summary. Ask someone else for actual references on cases if you care so much; I just want to finish this and eat my Chinese food.
To get to the point, though, I think there's a non-zero potential of these weird swimsuit pics existing. An overachieving narcissist with a lifetime of validation around him (not gonna say who because, well, you know how it is) is exactly the kind of person who would, if he were molesting his daughter, take a bunch of somewhat inappropriate pictures of her posing in a swimsuit and add them to their family photos as a form of boasting and domination.
An underachieving, impulsive, fetishistic, psychologically warped daughter with daddy issues and a personality disorder is the kind of person who would then take them and post them online while commenting she'd fuck herself as a child--again in a sort of ironic boast, perhaps flavored with the ghostly echos of a past cry that's already been silenced.
Oh, and, I will expand further on this in the future, but remember that Bella most likely has a substance use disorder. She both uses and deals uppers, which is likely to be part of what's fueling her wacky behavior at times and also may be a part of why she goes on Tor with strong security measures in place.
I will comment on the CP possession issue individually as well, later, after I've eaten and stuff.
But yeah that's some general rundown on the swimsuit stuff. Real creepy in its own right, Bella is a mushroom, die chris die, memes etc. Also lastly if you actually doubt she was molested then I will be happy to prove you wrong with cold hard opinions that aren't science but are just as unpleasant.
Remember, though, she's still a fucking disgusting person and should not be spared justice. Pity the spore she was, not the fungus she's become.
Now, I'm not going to say it's necessarily incriminating that there are photos of her in a swimsuit as a child, to a certain point. In fact, plenty of parents take innocuous "baby's first bath" pictures where their baby/toddler is technically nude, but this isn't generally considered pornography by rational human beings because it's not the nudity that's central to the image. "I know it when I see it" is a pretty good rule of thumb for this kind of thing unless you're fucked in the head; the first issue with it is that some people are prudish and think non-sexual nudity is the same as porn, and the second is that normal human beings don't want to go through pictures of children naked to figure out if they 'count' as pornography or not.
tl;dr it's a weird grey area.
Some cunts try to slip softcore CP through the filters by claiming it's 'art' if there's no alleged abuse in it (i.e. Cuties). Spoiler: Cuties is not art. It's gross preteen twerking shit for fat lazy arthouse chomos who are too special and euphoric to just use Tor and get arrested in a CP sting by the fucking FBI like the lower class filth crawling around them.
While taking pics of your kids at the beach and other places it's appropriate to wear a swimsuit is a normal and healthy family activity, it does start to get weird when people take pictures of their children wearing swimsuits/other revealing attire that doesn't really fit the location/context. It gets even more suspicious if they're doing strange poses, and especially so if these poses are obviously meant to evoke erotic sensations.
In fact, this sort of thing can even be considered child pornography under some lenses where simply having a photograph of a naked toddler in a bath or a child splashing around in a bikini suit at the pool would fail the test. The key reason is that pornography, generally, is intentionally erotic even if it's not explicit.
There have been cases testing things like photography of children in nudist colonies (this was a thing in the 1970s, I think?) and even those baby bath-time photos I mentioned earlier. Generally it seems to be agreed upon that the intent and focus choices of the photographer are highly relevant in such cases, at least as much as the content itself. This is why, when you see pictures of naked starving children in Africa, it is not considered pornography: the intent was to document a disaster, not to make erotica.
It's all more intricate than that, but that is a brief summary. Ask someone else for actual references on cases if you care so much; I just want to finish this and eat my Chinese food.
To get to the point, though, I think there's a non-zero potential of these weird swimsuit pics existing. An overachieving narcissist with a lifetime of validation around him (not gonna say who because, well, you know how it is) is exactly the kind of person who would, if he were molesting his daughter, take a bunch of somewhat inappropriate pictures of her posing in a swimsuit and add them to their family photos as a form of boasting and domination.
An underachieving, impulsive, fetishistic, psychologically warped daughter with daddy issues and a personality disorder is the kind of person who would then take them and post them online while commenting she'd fuck herself as a child--again in a sort of ironic boast, perhaps flavored with the ghostly echos of a past cry that's already been silenced.
Oh, and, I will expand further on this in the future, but remember that Bella most likely has a substance use disorder. She both uses and deals uppers, which is likely to be part of what's fueling her wacky behavior at times and also may be a part of why she goes on Tor with strong security measures in place.
I will comment on the CP possession issue individually as well, later, after I've eaten and stuff.
But yeah that's some general rundown on the swimsuit stuff. Real creepy in its own right, Bella is a mushroom, die chris die, memes etc. Also lastly if you actually doubt she was molested then I will be happy to prove you wrong with cold hard opinions that aren't science but are just as unpleasant.
Remember, though, she's still a fucking disgusting person and should not be spared justice. Pity the spore she was, not the fungus she's become.
