🐱 An OnlyFans Model Is Trying to Subpoena Reddit for Users Who Pirate Her Content

CatParty


After having her content stolen from OnlyFans and reposted to Reddit, adult performer Natasha Noel is demanding that Reddit hand over content thieves' full identities—including their usernames, legal names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and IP addresses.


On March 9, Florida-based attorney Jason Fischer filed a DMCA takedown request that included dozens of links to Reddit posts that contained images stolen from Noel's private OnlyFans and other social media accounts.
As reported by TorrentFreak, Fischer then followed that request with a subpoena application on Noel’s behalf in a California district court on March 23. Fischer referenced the same URLs that were included in the original DMCA takedown notice, and demanded that Reddit disclose the full identities of users who posted the stolen content.
A Reddit spokesperson said in a statement to Motherboard: "In accordance with Reddit's User Agreement, we respond to valid DMCA takedown requests for cases of infringing or copyright materials and will action any users or communities in appropriate circumstances." They also directed us to the company's guidelines for law enforcement, which states that Reddit "discloses user information in response to requests from law enforcement or government agencies only in accordance with or when required by applicable law."
Fischer is bringing a similar subpoena against Reddit on behalf of model and MMA fighter Valerie Loureda. Loureda is not on OnlyFans, but posts exclusive content to her own site fans can subscribe to for $9.99 a month. Reddit previously banned a subreddit dedicated to reposting her content, r/Valoureda, for "excessive copyright removals."
Stolen adult content is a longstanding problem on Reddit, with many performers naming it as the number one site they spend time filing takedown requests against.
If Reddit did give up users' identities to a private individual, it would set a precedent for expectations of privacy on social media platforms. Reddit is generally as anonymous as users want it to be—you don't have to use your legal name, or provide any identifying information to use the site. This might make it easier for content thieves to spread stolen works around without repercussions (beyond risking a suspension or ban, as it's against the terms of service), but anonymity is also a safety feature for many people, especially users in marginalized or precarious real-life situations. Anonymity is also, historically, upheld as a free speech right in the U.S.
We don't know how Noel or her attorney plan to proceed if they do receive the requested information, but pursuing further legal action against individual users seems like the obvious motivation for gathering specific identifying data like this. Motherboard has reached out to Fischer, and will update if we hear back.
 
What are the odds that Florida-based attorney Jason Fischer is doing this work for her in exchange for "private" photos?

Edit to add: You people are being too mean to this poor girl who is clearly pedophile baiting with her looks. You folks are just old fuddy duddies demanding actual tits and ass.
I want to say zero.

For every dumb and naive girl who whores herself on Onlyfans there is an equal number of guys willing to "represent them" in purging the internet of pirating her pictures.
They aren't doing it for sex, they are doing it for money by pretending to be real legal eagles when in reality its half-assed DMCAs, but the girls never need to know that, they just give them money to handle it until Null tells them to suck a dick.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LurkTrawl
What she needs to realize is that her desire to avoid actual work and instead seek shortcuts and run cons which is what online sex work is, comes from the same trickster/fuck the system mentality as the desire these dudes have to take shortcuts and run a con to get her nudes. You’re the system, lady, and they’re getting around your rules.
actually an interesting way to look at it
real prostitution is something most women only turn to in times of great desperation, or coercion. camgirling on the other hand is done just because it's seen as free and easy money

imo, onlyfans trying to sue over "stolen" nudes really isn't all that different from the regular old copyright claims that the film and music industry have been doing for decades now. and if disney and universal didn't manage to kill online piracy, then a lowly amateur porn site sure as hell doesn't stand a chance.


Why is it always the ugly ones who file lawsuits? Bitch, no one's pirating your content and they wouldn't even look at it if you were paying people for the privilege.
the successful ones make enough money to not give a fuck about the pennies they might be missing out on due to reddit reposters
 
they are doing it for money by pretending to be real legal eagles when in reality its half-assed DMCAs, but the girls never need to know that, they just give them money to handle it
I'm having trouble imagining that pedo-baiter having enough money to pay an attorney and the actions that have been taken require an actual attorney (not someone just submitting DMCA complaints).
 
>No tits
>Shitty tats
>Basic bitch bangs/glasses combo
>Flat soulless eyes
Would not even steal these nudes, let alone pay for them.
View attachment 2045448
Good job fuckwad. Now Null is about to get yet another DMCA from an OnlyFans Thot's grifter lawyer because of you. Even though your post comments on the material subject matter of the photo and is a valid criticism that would be recognized under Fair Use, and the images being vital to discussion of the individual for the purpose of ridicule which isexplicitly permitted as demonstrated and affirmed by Benjamin V Hughes.

From a business perspective alone this is also a terrible idea. I'm not a coomer, but if I were one, I would never subscribe to the OnlyFans of a chick I know cuts off my coom content pipeline. I'm much more likely to see a picture of a girl I like, then go find her onlyfans and follow it, than hearing that one of the Coomjeets who post nudes on Reddit got send to federal prison and then subscribing to her. Now you're just seen as the bitch who goes after Reddit coomer

Sic Semper Coomer. Sic Semper Thot
 
I'm having trouble imagining that pedo-baiter having enough money to pay an attorney and the actions that have been taken require an actual attorney (not someone just submitting DMCA complaints).
Could just be a publicity stunt, the whore who sued Reddit users.


Or the attorney representing her really enjoys taking their clients money and will represent anyone for the right price.

More whores tried to take that off the goddamn internet! by hiring Nick McCandless to represent their DMCA requests, dude is a jew of note

 
  • Agree
Reactions: LurkTrawl
It's not just that you can get a boyfriend/girlfriend that will actually be better or look up images on Google, you can get catfished buying images from these shameless thots. An ex-friend of mine had all his nudes leaked by an Onlyfans thot and they were spread around to others at the university like wildfire lmao. People who use or have Onlyfans have absolutely no self-respect. I just don't want to date someone with an Onlyfans whoring themselves out to other people. It's very unattractive and screams of both desperation and sexual deviancy to me.
 
Imagine expecting to get paid for naked photos of yourself that you posted on the internet, where there's freely accessible terabytes of women who actually look good to beat off to, when you look like that.
 
Imagine expecting to get paid for naked photos of yourself that you posted on the internet, where there's freely accessible terabytes of women who actually look good to beat off to, when you look like that.
I mean just because you don’t pay up doesn’t mean a lot of them do get paid
 
Back