Orbiter Andrew Anglin - Editor-in-Chief of The Daily Stormer, midget nazi with a furry troll army, a lawsuit, and a pedo streak

[AgendaPoster]

His takes on the war in Ukraine are super stupid. I highly doubt there are hundreds of thousands of mercenaries in the world. It's a pretty niche occupation. Especially legitimate mercenaries. It's just more Russiaboo vatnigger cope. Like the attempt at taking Kiev was just a feint the Russians aren't using the T-62's on the frontlines which wasn't true. The T-62's are being used on the frontlines. Russia is losing.

I made a Gab account so I could troll him and the other stupid faggots on Gab. They get triggered super easy. One of them spent days sending me PM's on Gab telling me how he was going to rape me. This same faggot called catboy Fuentes a leader. LOL

I am kind of tempted to make a Twatter account so I can troll the shit out of them over there as well. By troll I mean post shit they don't want to hear AKA the truth. LOL

No, there is more to this than just stupidity.
You have to keep in mind that for the Western far right, it's now a stereotype that it is hardcore pro-Russian. There are very few exceptions, like Greg Johnson and Frodi-something. There are more Russians skeptical of Putin and the war than Western right wingers.
IMO here there's some sort of combination of covert funding (remember that we know Russian secret services amplified the extremes in the West), for people like Anglin some exile resentment against the native country, and for the TRS/NJP guys also some sort of inane expectation that Russia is "anti-ZOG" and opposes the "West" (which in 2016 all these people were fighting for... allegedly).
The whole movement is far too pro-Russian as a whole to the point where it's something you cannot disagree on, like how the vax used to be for the anti-vax parts of the right.
Some of the guys, like Mark Collett, seem just misguided, and some resentful that part of their money goes to Ukraine.
The most suspicious part is that they now moan about Nazis, which is comical. In the Western far right view, it's better your country is crushed and occupied by Russia, compared to having McDonalds and a dozen trannies wandering around, or taking weapons/funds from some countries with ties to Israel or Jewish oligarchs.
This ain't just lunacy. Nobody is that stupid and inconsistent. This is people having a goal and willing to lie for whatever that goal is. Anglin, TRS etc might not be incredibly smart, but they are generally intelligent. They know what they do.

 

[BOTTOM TEXT]

No, there is more to this than just stupidity.
You have to keep in mind that for the Western far right, it's now a stereotype that it is hardcore pro-Russian. There are very few exceptions, like Greg Johnson and Frodi-something. There are more Russians skeptical of Putin and the war than Western right wingers.
IMO here there's some sort of combination of covert funding (remember that we know Russian secret services amplified the extremes in the West), for people like Anglin some exile resentment against the native country, and for the TRS/NJP guys also some sort of inane expectation that Russia is "anti-ZOG" and opposes the "West" (which in 2016 all these people were fighting for... allegedly).
The whole movement is far too pro-Russian as a whole to the point where it's something you cannot disagree on, like how the vax used to be for the anti-vax parts of the right.
Some of the guys, like Mark Collett, seem just misguided, and some resentful that part of their money goes to Ukraine.
The most suspicious part is that they now moan about Nazis, which is comical. In the Western far right view, it's better your country is crushed and occupied by Russia, compared to having McDonalds and a dozen trannies wandering around, or taking weapons/funds from some countries with ties to Israel or Jewish oligarchs.
This ain't just lunacy. Nobody is that stupid and inconsistent. This is people having a goal and willing to lie for whatever that goal is. Anglin, TRS etc might not be incredibly smart, but they are generally intelligent. They know what they do.

weev is actually very pro-Ukraine lol. Anglin of course knows there's another side to it that isn't "pro-anal" or whatever, but this is just a topic he can't approach with some honesty for one second. Russian victory is imminent, Ukrainians are Satanic baby-eaters, and this conflict is more consequential than WW2. I think he just thinks his readers are literal retards who will believe anything (they are).
Well, good thing it's not going to escalate into WW3 (as Anglin frequently predicts) because some of the Russia shills in the West would come to regret that very quickly.

 

[CuzinEd]

No, there is more to this than just stupidity.
You have to keep in mind that for the Western far right, it's now a stereotype that it is hardcore pro-Russian. There are very few exceptions, like Greg Johnson and Frodi-something. There are more Russians skeptical of Putin and the war than Western right wingers.
IMO here there's some sort of combination of covert funding (remember that we know Russian secret services amplified the extremes in the West), for people like Anglin some exile resentment against the native country, and for the TRS/NJP guys also some sort of inane expectation that Russia is "anti-ZOG" and opposes the "West" (which in 2016 all these people were fighting for... allegedly).
The whole movement is far too pro-Russian as a whole to the point where it's something you cannot disagree on, like how the vax used to be for the anti-vax parts of the right.
Some of the guys, like Mark Collett, seem just misguided, and some resentful that part of their money goes to Ukraine.
The most suspicious part is that they now moan about Nazis, which is comical. In the Western far right view, it's better your country is crushed and occupied by Russia, compared to having McDonalds and a dozen trannies wandering around, or taking weapons/funds from some countries with ties to Israel or Jewish oligarchs.
This ain't just lunacy. Nobody is that stupid and inconsistent. This is people having a goal and willing to lie for whatever that goal is. Anglin, TRS etc might not be incredibly smart, but they are generally intelligent. They know what they do.

Putin used to be stationed in East Berlin when he was with the KGB. One of his jobs was passing money to Neo Nazis in West Germany. Putin was removed from his post in East Berlin and the reason was supposedly corruption. He was doing something the Soviets didn't like so they took him out of there. If you listened to the speech Putin made right before the invasion he basically sounded like your typical Western liberal leftist talking about Nazis and Fascists. According to Putin Ukraine was the Fourth Reich and they were planning Operation Barbarossa 2.0. Seeing people like Anglin and TRS supporting it is funny because Putin would have all of them killed for being Nazis and Fascists. But that was all just a BS excuse to invade Ukraine. The real reason is just expansionism.

I don't have anything against the Russians, but I don't see Putin as the savior of the West or white people. Russia does what they believe is best for them. Of course, Ukraine kind of says differently.

I do believe the Ukrainians have a right to fight back. I am not saying I would give them a bunch of money and weapons. I don't go around virtue signaling about Ukraine. But the Russians are losing and if it was going the other way I would say so.

 

[Tren Shapiro]

For once the lefties should proclaim a primacy of heterosexuality only to laugh at guys like Anglin going full fag.

Yes, hypothetically if evil started promoting good then people would look incredibly silly for reflexively taking an opposing stance.
Not very likely though, is it?

 

[AgendaPoster]

Putin used to be stationed in East Berlin when he was with the KGB. One of his jobs was passing money to Neo Nazis in West Germany. Putin was removed from his post in East Berlin and the reason was supposedly corruption. He was doing something the Soviets didn't like so they took him out of there. If you listened to the speech Putin made right before the invasion he basically sounded like your typical Western liberal leftist talking about Nazis and Fascists. According to Putin Ukraine was the Fourth Reich and they were planning Operation Barbarossa 2.0. Seeing people like Anglin and TRS supporting it is funny because Putin would have all of them killed for being Nazis and Fascists. But that was all just a BS excuse to invade Ukraine. The real reason is just expansionism.

I don't have anything against the Russians, but I don't see Putin as the savior of the West or white people. Russia does what they believe is best for them. Of course, Ukraine kind of says differently.

I do believe the Ukrainians have a right to fight back. I am not saying I would give them a bunch of money and weapons. I don't go around virtue signaling about Ukraine. But the Russians are losing and if it was going the other way I would say so.

I don't think Putin truly believes in this. These people are smart, cold blooded and calculated, and simply seized on the opportunity to paint Russia as an anti-fascist fighting force. What they don't understand is that nobody sane buys it, since we can all see the repression regular Russians endure at home when they try to protest, we all see the poisonings and random accidents, we all see the cynical "trad life" weaponization and the accumulation of money in few hands (probably most importantly). So this time, it's obvious this is simply an empire, decaying, and lashing out, creating a crisis to maintain its legitimacy in front of the masses. It's hard to believe anyone at the top in Russia buys the official stories. But this is the path they have to walk now, as it was set by others more powerful. Ukraine fucked up too by giving them this red meat and tolerating their extremists, who are simply dumb and misguided ethnonationalists. Being a Slav and a Nazi doesn't mix, I wish these nerds understood that the Nazis did not want ethnic states that everyone in East Europe is so fond about, they wanted an empire and domination over the "lesser races", and enslavement/extermination of Slavs. But all this idiocy pales in comparison with Russia starting an actual invasion and trying to capture land from a neighbor by force, as if we're in the 1800s.
The thing with the military help is complicated. Stopping the help will mean that Ukraine will no longer be able to fight a war in weeks, maybe months if lucky. They have no industry to mass produce ammo, vehicles etc. at the rate needed. So stopping the money would lead to one of these two outcomes:
- Russia wins and takes whatever land it wants, installs an occupation regime, slowly makes Ukraine into a buffer zone province
- Russia wins and takes whatever land it wants, installs an occupation regime, Ukrainians fight a partisan war, hide into rural and inaccessible areas, organize in Poland, Romania etc., and grind down occupiers over the next decade or 5, through terrorism and guerrilla warfare
But the war would stop for sure and Russia will occupy large parts of Ukraine if it's starved of military help, so when people want that to happen, they are essentially arguing for the legitimizing of imperial war of conquest inside Europe. IMO this will not stay local and will eventually lead into a WW. There is no way we return to building empires without a WW.

 

[YourFriendlyLurker 2.0]

Spoiler: sperg on Russian sperg

What they don't understand is that nobody sane buys it,

That's the problem lol. Sanity is quite rare nowdays, isn't it?

I don't have anything against the Russians, but I don't see Putin as the savior of the West or white people.

Russia is dying out. Official (artifically decreased) statistics showed - 1 mln people in 2021 tnx to COVID and generally shitty heathcare. In 2022 he sends young males to war making abysmal demographics even more dire. Russian women will marry guys from China, Vietnam, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, etc, due to the shortage of white slav males killed in the grind. Future Russia is not "white" at all but of course Pu is "a saviour of white race and the west" because otherwise they will have to agree with some points from the opposite side which is impossible. On the other hand if they are gonna say that Pu is saving future west and white race from Russians (since there's not gonna be a lot of Russians in the future), I am gonna agree.

If you listened to the speech Putin made right before the invasion he basically sounded like your typical Western liberal leftist talking about Nazis and Fascists

There's one more intreresting details the western right-wing Pu's fans miss. Once upon a time Russia also had a right-wing opposition to the regime. They were strange guys with "Russia for Russians" slogans, something between orthodox christianity and beliefs in Perun. Strongly traditional and anti-immigration and if we are honest, many of them were kinda true nazis. Those guys were not hipsters like Andrew-boy or Fuentes, they were remotedly well-organized, based on football fans groups and quasi-criminal structures. TLDR - they could be the real force, something like Right Sector / Azov in Ukraine. What do you think was the first thing Pu did when he became the President? He destroyed the right-wing opposition. They were killed, arersted, became "extremists". The football fans were taken under the strict control. It happened a decade before he turned against the so-called "liberals" . Probably one of the most well-known examples was Tesak. He was a typical right-winger with takes about "pedo-groomers", races, etc. He was arrested in 2015 and eventually tortured to death in prison in 2020. Here goes Putin the right-winger. If Anglin and other tards were unlucky to be born in Russia right now they would be in prison with a bottle up their asses.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Once upon a time Russia also had a right-wing opposition to the regime. They were strange guys with "Russia for Russians" slogans, something between orthodox christianity and beliefs in Perun. Strongly traditional and anti-immigration and if we are honest, many of them were kinda true nazis. Those guys were not hipsters like Andrew-boy or Fuentes, they were remotedly well-organized, based on football fans groups and quasi-criminal structures. TLDR - they could be the real force, something like Right Sector / Azov in Ukraine. What do you think was the first thing Pu did when he became the President? He destroyed the right-wing opposition. They were killed, arersted, became "extremists". The football fans were taken under the strict control. It happened a decade before he turned against the so-called "liberals" . Probably one of the most well-known examples was Tesak. He was a typical right-winger with takes about "pedo-groomers", races, etc. He was arrested in 2015 and eventually tortured to death in prison in 2020. Here goes Putin the right-winger. If Anglin and other tards were unlucky to be born in Russia right now they would be in prison with a bottle up their asses.

Yes, I posted about this before, in the Russian War spergery thread.
It's all part of the plan. There is ONE type of nationalism allowed, the patriotic type, that sees Russia as an empire (implicitly) manifesting in various forms, like the Soviets or the Russian Empire before it, or the Russian Federation now. Dissidents are problematic and should be removed. Putin is the strong man that knows the way and you have to fall in line, even if it means that you need to go die horribly in some muddy trench while your elites are drinking champaign in their Vienna mansions with a dozen rented whores.
Ethnic nationalism is dangerous for this multicultural empire. If Russians are bound by blood to the land, maybe so are Chechens and the rest of the rebellious minorities at the empire's border. And we already know how much of an issue that can be for the Moscow center.

The death of the Russian far right

How the Kremlin destroyed the far right in Russia, while backing it in the West.

www.aljazeera.com

We cannot do much other than observing, though, as frustrating as it is. There are a lot of weird machinations around this war, and I don't consider Americans as the glorious freedom defenders and disinterested Ukraine helpers they present themselves to be. Everyone involved has an interest. US likely wants to severely weaken Russia and take it out of the "big 3" competition, so it can focus on China. Russia wants to reestablish its imperial greatness and prove it can stay in this game, and to get a cozy buffer from NATO in the West. Speaking of NATO, East European countries, where I live, specifically entered these structures that make you lose some sovereignty because of Russia, for which they have no love. I think we will see a militarization of Poland and Romania at the very least, but it's quite likely even Hungary and Slovakia will eventually go down this path. American bases will multiply here and eventually there will be nukes pointing at Russia too, at least if the war continues.
China seems to be the biggest winner from all this if it manages to stay neutral while Europe gets poorer and the US and Russia are at each other's throat.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Yes, I posted about this before, in the Russian War spergery thread.
It's all part of the plan. There is ONE type of nationalism allowed, the patriotic type, that sees Russia as an empire (implicitly) manifesting in various forms, like the Soviets or the Russian Empire before it, or the Russian Federation now. Dissidents are problematic and should be removed. Putin is the strong man that knows the way and you have to fall in line, even if it means that you need to go die horribly in some muddy trench while your elites are drinking champaign in their Vienna mansions with a dozen rented whores.
Ethnic nationalism is dangerous for this multicultural empire. If Russians are bound by blood to the land, maybe so are Chechens and the rest of the rebellious minorities at the empire's border. And we already know how much of an issue that can be for the Moscow center.
View attachment 4118421

The death of the Russian far right

How the Kremlin destroyed the far right in Russia, while backing it in the West.

www.aljazeera.com

We cannot do much other than observing, though, as frustrating as it is. There are a lot of weird machinations around this war, and I don't consider Americans as the glorious freedom defenders and disinterested Ukraine helpers they present themselves to be. Everyone involved has an interest. US likely wants to severely weaken Russia and take it out of the "big 3" competition, so it can focus on China. Russia wants to reestablish its imperial greatness and prove it can stay in this game, and to get a cozy buffer from NATO in the West. Speaking of NATO, East European countries, where I live, specifically entered these structures that make you lose some sovereignty because of Russia, for which they have no love. I think we will see a militarization of Poland and Romania at the very least, but it's quite likely even Hungary and Slovakia will eventually go down this path. American bases will multiply here and eventually there will be nukes pointing at Russia too, at least if the war continues.
China seems to be the biggest winner from all this if it manages to stay neutral while Europe gets poorer and the US and Russia are at each other's throat.

I don't think Putin truly believes in this. These people are smart, cold blooded and calculated, and simply seized on the opportunity to paint Russia as an anti-fascist fighting force. What they don't understand is that nobody sane buys it, since we can all see the repression regular Russians endure at home when they try to protest, we all see the poisonings and random accidents, we all see the cynical "trad life" weaponization and the accumulation of money in few hands (probably most importantly). So this time, it's obvious this is simply an empire, decaying, and lashing out, creating a crisis to maintain its legitimacy in front of the masses. It's hard to believe anyone at the top in Russia buys the official stories. But this is the path they have to walk now, as it was set by others more powerful. Ukraine fucked up too by giving them this red meat and tolerating their extremists, who are simply dumb and misguided ethnonationalists. Being a Slav and a Nazi doesn't mix, I wish these nerds understood that the Nazis did not want ethnic states that everyone in East Europe is so fond about, they wanted an empire and domination over the "lesser races", and enslavement/extermination of Slavs. But all this idiocy pales in comparison with Russia starting an actual invasion and trying to capture land from a neighbor by force, as if we're in the 1800s.
The thing with the military help is complicated. Stopping the help will mean that Ukraine will no longer be able to fight a war in weeks, maybe months if lucky. They have no industry to mass produce ammo, vehicles etc. at the rate needed. So stopping the money would lead to one of these two outcomes:
- Russia wins and takes whatever land it wants, installs an occupation regime, slowly makes Ukraine into a buffer zone province
- Russia wins and takes whatever land it wants, installs an occupation regime, Ukrainians fight a partisan war, hide into rural and inaccessible areas, organize in Poland, Romania etc., and grind down occupiers over the next decade or 5, through terrorism and guerrilla warfare
But the war would stop for sure and Russia will occupy large parts of Ukraine if it's starved of military help, so when people want that to happen, they are essentially arguing for the legitimizing of imperial war of conquest inside Europe. IMO this will not stay local and will eventually lead into a WW. There is no way we return to building empires without a WW.

Spoiler: Russia sperging

Your analysis is completely wrong. Probably because you're being fed bullshit by your Russiaphobic media.

1. There won't be any Ukrainian insurgency. The slava ukraini are either fighting to death against Russia right now or they have fled to Western Europe. The most likely scenario is that the pro Russian areas of Ukraine (from Kharkov or Odessa) are incorporated into the Russian Federation and a rump Ukrainian state remains. This state would be demilitarized, landlocked and poor. If they're lucky, they might be able to form an independent govt and join the EU but they'll be a drag on Europe's economy.

https://blogsmedia.lse.ac.uk/blogs.dir/28/files/2014/02/chartukraine1.jpg

https://i.redd.it/um4z36lb5zc91.jpg

2. We're at the tipping point right now. Russia is preparing a huge military offensive. Russia will likely defeat the Ukrainian army after Bakhmut falls and they might push them back to or even take Kiev. At this point, NATO weapons aren't enough. Ukraine needs NATO, especially Poland, to enter the battlefield. Either NATO enters and we escalate to WW3 or situation 1 occurs and Ukraine loses.

3. Putin is a pro-West moderate. He didn't want war. He didn't want to conquer Ukraine. He wanted good relations with the West. He wanted to protect Russia from NATO. All these sanctions against Russia and bad faith deals like the Minsk accords have destroyed the moderates in Russia. I don't think the ethnic nationalists are rising but we're going towards that direction as Russia realizes the demographic and cultural situation of the West. They mocked the Bout prisoner transfer because Biden prioritized the non-white.

 

[AgendaPoster]

BoxerShorts, "Black Lives Will Punish You", even the fucking post format is autistic lmao.
Are those your own opinions? Why spoiler them?
I swear to god, you're one weird cookie. If you're not shitposting, I'd see a psychiatrist.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

BoxerShorts, "Black Lives Will Punish You", even the fucking post format is autistic lmao.

Mods did that to troll me. I can't change it.

Are those your own opinions? Why spoiler them?

mods threadban me if I sperg too much.

I swear to god, you're one weird cookie. If you're not shitposting, I'd see a psychiatrist.

Spoiler: more russia sperging.

Analysis: Russia's grim battle for Bakhmut may yield pyrrhic victory at best

The nearly five-month battle for the small city of Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine has ground on for so long and wrought so much death and destruction that, even if Russia does prevail, it will be a pyrrhic victory, military experts say.

www.reuters.com

>Russian win in Bakhmut would be pyrrhic victory - experts
This is newspeak for strategic victory

>Small city is, however, useful for Ukrainian supply lines
This is newspeak for important supply lines and Bakhmut is in the middle of Ukraine's strongest defensive line.

>Much of city has been flattened, most residents have fled
true

>Unquantified but heavy losses reported on both sides
Newspeak for Ukrainian loses are higher.

https://www.axios.com/2022/12/20/ukraine-zelensky-visit-us-congress-address

Ukraine to boost Belarus border defences as Putin meets Lukashenko

Kyiv fears a fresh Russian assault is on the horizon after President Putin travelled to Minsk.

www.bbc.com

Bakhmut is about to fall. This is the strongest defensive line. Once Russia breaks it, it's all downhill to Kiev. Zelensky is going to visit USA tomorrow. He will beg for more help. Putin is in Belarus. Russia has mobilized a military to either capture Kiev or to deter NATO (Poland) from entering Ukraine. At this point, either NATO enters and helps Ukraine and escalates the war or they allow Russia to defeat Ukraine.

IMO, the best situation is for Russia to win and Ukraine to negotiate to Russia's terms. If NATO enters then we'll enter WW3. If Russia starts losing, I think Iran and China will enter to help Russia. If that occurs then it might trigger China to go after Taiwan. I think large percentage of the West's population doesn't want WW3. So if WW3 occurs, it'll destabilize these nations. We're looking at a WW1 paradigm changing situation depending on whether NATO enters or not.

 

[CuzinEd]

I don't think Putin truly believes in this. These people are smart, cold blooded and calculated, and simply seized on the opportunity to paint Russia as an anti-fascist fighting force. What they don't understand is that nobody sane buys it, since we can all see the repression regular Russians endure at home when they try to protest, we all see the poisonings and random accidents, we all see the cynical "trad life" weaponization and the accumulation of money in few hands (probably most importantly). So this time, it's obvious this is simply an empire, decaying, and lashing out, creating a crisis to maintain its legitimacy in front of the masses. It's hard to believe anyone at the top in Russia buys the official stories. But this is the path they have to walk now, as it was set by others more powerful. Ukraine fucked up too by giving them this red meat and tolerating their extremists, who are simply dumb and misguided ethnonationalists. Being a Slav and a Nazi doesn't mix, I wish these nerds understood that the Nazis did not want ethnic states that everyone in East Europe is so fond about, they wanted an empire and domination over the "lesser races", and enslavement/extermination of Slavs. But all this idiocy pales in comparison with Russia starting an actual invasion and trying to capture land from a neighbor by force, as if we're in the 1800s.
The thing with the military help is complicated. Stopping the help will mean that Ukraine will no longer be able to fight a war in weeks, maybe months if lucky. They have no industry to mass produce ammo, vehicles etc. at the rate needed. So stopping the money would lead to one of these two outcomes:
- Russia wins and takes whatever land it wants, installs an occupation regime, slowly makes Ukraine into a buffer zone province
- Russia wins and takes whatever land it wants, installs an occupation regime, Ukrainians fight a partisan war, hide into rural and inaccessible areas, organize in Poland, Romania etc., and grind down occupiers over the next decade or 5, through terrorism and guerrilla warfare
But the war would stop for sure and Russia will occupy large parts of Ukraine if it's starved of military help, so when people want that to happen, they are essentially arguing for the legitimizing of imperial war of conquest inside Europe. IMO this will not stay local and will eventually lead into a WW. There is no way we return to building empires without a WW.

Of course Putin doesn't really believe it. It's just Russia's lame excuse to justify the invasion. It also plays well with the Russian Boomers. Russia is very Boomer tier about WW2 and Nazi Germany. They are just as bad if not worse than Americans are.

If the US stopped giving Ukraine money now it wouldn't change the outcome of the war. Russia has already lost. They just haven't admitted it yet. The damage is already done. Countries could cut Ukraine off completely and there are enough weapons in Ukraine for them to keep fighting the Russians for a while. This isn't pro Ukraine sentiment it's just the truth. Considering how badly Russia has done I don't think they would have been successful in Ukraine even if the West didn't help Ukraine. It probably would have taken longer but the Russians would still lose at least eventually. It would have been more like a guerilla warfare situation than what it is. Russia might have been in Ukraine for years. The other part of it is the sanctions on Russia. Could Russia continue to fight a prolonged war in Ukraine while it's economy collapses under the strain of sanctions? Most likely not.

 

[Jimmy Tarleton]

Earlier I shared Milo's take on the Tate affair, now let's check on his fellow AF appreciator Andrew Anglin:

https://dailystormer.in/andrew-tate-arrested-in-romania/

Regardless of the criticisms I may have, I stand with Tate 100% against the people trying to put him in prison. These are fake charges. He didn’t do anything and the persecution is political.

If it's against someone you're okay with, like someone who's made a career out of shitting on women and teaching other men to do likewise, it's always "political persecution" isn't it, Anglin?

https://dailystormer.in/andrew-tate-prosecution-was-organized-by-the-united-states-government/

I have been saying that it is obvious that the US organized the prosecution of Andrew Tate in Romania. I didn’t cite any evidence for that, nor make a factual claim

Of course you didn't Andre, because you have a track record of making shit up.

https://dailystormer.in/andrew-tate...ed-with-well-known-tranny-fake-news-hoaxster/

In my article about Tate’s arrest, I also cited sources that turned out to be incorrect

Oopsie!

And yet...

The fact is: the Daily Stormer is a much more accurate news website than any of the mainstream sites

This grifting faggot even takes the opportunity to pat himself on the back in spite of it all.

His shitty takes aside, Anglin also has a track record of picking very strange hills to die on. First it was Harvey Weinstein (Jew), then Kanye West (black), and now Andrew Tate (black/mulatto), to say nothing of entire countries like China and Afghanistan under the Taliban. For someone supposedly a white nationalist Anglin sure likes going to bat for his supposed racial enemies, doesn't he?

 

[Jimmy Tarleton]

https://archive.is/GlEaf

Mexican problems have spilled over into our country many times before. Pancho Villa went into Columbus, New Mexico and killed 19 random civilians and burned the town.

Mexicans think very differently than white people. They have very different historical norms.

But you literally simp unconditionally for a Mexican by the name of Fuentes, Andre. Shouldn't you be regarding this development as a good thing?

 

[KateHikes]

I was a lurker on GU for a very long time, and I will freely admit that I generally like Anglin and think he, unlike most of the other high-profile dissident-right e-celebs, has good intentions. Having said that, there are two kinds of people on the dissident-right that have enthusiastically thrown their lot behind Russia in their invasion of Ukraine. Those helping to advance a psychological operation on white westerners, and those falling for it. Anglin is in the latter category (where as TRS is obviously in the former). It’s disappointing and it definitely affects my opinion of him negatively, but he’s definitely not a bad actor.

What he and everyone else (on both sides) fails to realize is that nothing about this conflict even resembles what is being presented to the public. Yes, Putin is an anti-white, anti-west, crypto-commie Eurasian imperialist whose motives are bad, and no he is not a Christian anti-ZOG crusader. That should not be overlooked, but the real agenda behind the war is bigger than Putin’s expansionist inclinations. The invasion and conflict are being carried out in order to further the great reset agenda, which is made evident in every single consequence and outcome that’s resulted from it.

Anglin’s primary mistake in analyzing the conflict is his assumption that the ZOG regimes in the west are stupid and incompetent in how they’ve dealt with the situation. They are not. They are simply playing their role in the destruction of America and the west broadly, a critical plank in the implementation of the WEF-style, global technocratic great reset. It’s communism given a facelift for the 21st century, and Putin is all hands on deck with it. In fact, he’s a primary player in the agenda, as the destruction of western civilization and shifting of the global power dynamic is set to benefit him directly.

Almost no one engaged in arguments about this situation have any idea what they’re looking at or what’s actually going on. As usual, both sides are being fed Jewish bullshit and falling right into the rhetorical paradigm and dialectic the Jews have constructed for goyim consumption.

 

[░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓ด้้้้้็็็็็้้]

The invasion and conflict are being carried out in order to further the great reset agenda, which is made evident in every single consequence and outcome that’s resulted from it.

Anglin’s primary mistake in analyzing the conflict is his assumption that the ZOG regimes in the west are stupid and incompetent in how they’ve dealt with the situation. They are not. They are simply playing their role in the destruction of America and the west broadly, a critical plank in the implementation of the WEF-style, global technocratic great reset. It’s communism given a facelift for the 21st century, and Putin is all hands on deck with it. In fact, he’s a primary player in the agenda, as the destruction of western civilization and shifting of the global power dynamic is set to benefit him directly.

Almost no one engaged in arguments about this situation have any idea what they’re looking at or what’s actually going on. As usual, both sides are being fed Jewish bullshit and falling right into the rhetorical paradigm and dialectic the Jews have constructed for goyim consumption.

It is interesting to note how Covid was originally the big thing used to crash the economy, strangle supply lines, and centralize wealth into the hands of a few corporations. But then when the public got tired of Covid and even normies were pushing back against lockdowns (Canadian trucker protest, Chinese protests, etc.), by sheer coincidence the cold war in Ukraine suddenly became hot after eight years, and now international sanctions + war production are being used to crash the economy, strangle supply lines, and centralize wealth into the hands of a few corporations. Funny how that worked out.

 

[KateHikes]

t is interesting to note how Covid was originally the big thing used to crash the economy, strangle supply lines, and centralize wealth into the hands of a few corporations. But then when the public got tired of Covid and even normies were pushing back against lockdowns (Canadian trucker protest, Chinese protests, etc.), by sheer coincidence the cold war in Ukraine suddenly became hot after eight years, and now international sanctions + war production are being used to crash the economy, strangle supply lines, and centralize wealth into the hands of a fe

Right. There are no coincidences when it comes to this kind of shit. To think the ZOG regimes in the west are just reacting on the fly and bumbling their way into exacerbating all the problems that emerged from the conflict, and they just so happen to fit flawlessly with the goals of those pushing the great reset and hyper-globalism in every facet, is so naive and misguided it’s comical.

The other aspect to the fallout of the conflict, which could be seen coming a mile away by anyone with a decent grasp on these sorts of things, is the undermining of the US dollar, which is also critical to implementing these deranged great reset policies. How in the world can one sincerely believe the big shots in the ZOG regimes did not foresee the consequences of their actions? Absolutely retarded.

 

[Jimmy Tarleton]

Whenever a notable person's untimely death gets reported in the news, Anglin quickly seizes the opportunity to blame it on the COVID vax, every time. This time it's Elvis's daughter:

Elvis Presley’s Daughter (Non-Fat) Dead at 54 After Cardiac Arrest – …

archived 13 Jan 2023 10:00:33 UTC

archive.md

Andrew Anglin on Twitter: "Oh dear. @Pfizer, how is that commotio cor…

archived 13 Jan 2023 11:32:27 UTC

archive.md

But unlike that bald-headed idiot, we here at Kiwi Farms know for a fact that Lisa Marie died of cringe caused by Anglin's friend Ethan Ralph desecrating the likeness of her father for his cheap Vegas wedding.

 

[CuzinEd]

Whenever a notable person's untimely death gets reported in the news, Anglin quickly seizes the opportunity to blame it on the COVID vax, every time. This time it's Elvis's daughter:

Elvis Presley’s Daughter (Non-Fat) Dead at 54 After Cardiac Arrest – …

archived 13 Jan 2023 10:00:33 UTC

archive.md

Andrew Anglin on Twitter: "Oh dear. @Pfizer, how is that commotio cor…

archived 13 Jan 2023 11:32:27 UTC

archive.md

View attachment 4256063

But unlike that bald-headed idiot, we here at Kiwi Farms know for a fact that Lisa Marie died of cringe caused by Anglin's friend Ethan Ralph desecrating the likeness of her father for his cheap Vegas wedding.
View attachment 4256092

How old is Ethan Ralph? Is he in his fucking 50's? He looks like a fucking Boomer. LOL

People are supposed to be looking younger these days. Not fucking old. LOL

 

[Jimmy Tarleton]

How old is Ethan Ralph? Is he in his fucking 50's? He looks like a fucking Boomer. LOL

People are supposed to be looking younger these days. Not fucking old. LOL

This is from an archive of Ralph's Wikipedia page taken last year, meaning he's 37 now.

As for his premature aging, Ralph already has crappy genetics to begin with, and his daily diet of Maker's Mark and cheap fried food (or is it Jose Cuervo and tacos now?) sure as shit aren't helping things.

 

[CuzinEd]

View attachment 4269556
This is from an archive of Ralph's Wikipedia page taken last year, meaning he's 37 now.

As for his premature aging, Ralph already has crappy genetics to begin with, and his daily diet of Maker's Mark and cheap fried food (or is it Jose Cuervo and tacos now?) sure as shit aren't helping things.

He is a year younger than me and looks like he is older. That's got to suck. Looks like a guy in his late 40's or 50's. I never drank smoked or did any drugs. I don't look 38 either. In 2018 I was 34 and was told I looked like I was in my early to mid 20's.