Orbiter Andrew Anglin - Editor-in-Chief of The Daily Stormer, midget nazi with a furry troll army, a lawsuit, and a pedo streak

[CuzinEd]

He doesn't seem to have done anything to deserve a ban. He could actually win his appeal.


How long has he been saying that? He's got no excuse now.

I don't know what Twatter considers a ban worthy these days. In the past it could have been anything. I imagine you can still get banned for just about anything. Twatter seems to have moved over to the gay temp ban thing. If you fuck up too much they perma ban your account. Anglin is a terminally online fag so he will just make a second account. The problem is that Anglin is well known with leftist groups. He doesn't know how to keep his head down and not draw attention. Twitter might be better than it was but it's still not an absolute free speech platform. There are rules you have to follow still. Anglin can't stop acting like a retard long enough to exist anywhere. He probably did something to break one of those rules. Even if he does show up on a platform he won't be able to keep his retarded wignat faggot bullshit in check long enough to stay on it. Eventually he will go off and start acting like a cringey retard.

Also, those cringey NAFO faggots know about him and they are pretty big group of terminally online faggots that cheer for Ukraine. They are like vatniggers but instead of Russia it's Ukraine. In this case their cheering for Ukraine makes sense because Ukraine is actually kicking Russia's ass. It's not the biggest group of online cringelord faggots ever. But it's pretty big and they have a wide reach.

Here is one of their videos. It's concentrated cringe. I don't know if this is some kind of Fed thing or not most of the time. It all seems kind of forced and not very popular. Just look at the low view counts on the videos. But all you need is a few thousand terminally online cringey faggots to keep someone like Anglin off Twatter.

 

[CuzinEd]

I hate to double post but I can't edit my previous post.

I was checking out Daily Stormer and it seems Anglin is having a faggy little bitch fit about being perma banned from Twatter.

I was right, he posted shit about women and caught a ban for it. Of course this lead him to do what he always does. Claim it's not his fault. "This bodes very poorly for Elon Musk's Twitter". Yes, it bodes poorly because you couldn't stop acting like a fucking retard. Now it's someone else's fault and not his. Anglin claims what he posted didn't break the rules. He claims this is political. It's not because he is a fucking retard. No, that can't be it. Like a nigger claiming racism for everything. It's a political witch hunt against me. It's not because I behaved like a fucking tard.

If you want a good laugh.

I’m Apparently Banned from Twitter for Making a Crude Joke About a Woman - Daily Stormer

I was suspended from Twitter for 12 hours on Sunday for making a joke about a woman. On Monday, the

dailystormer.in

 

[Sparkling Yuzu]

He claims this is political. It's not because he is a fucking retard.

I’ve been extremely, extremely careful. I do not even post the word “Jew.”

lol, beyond parody.

If I am actually being permanently banned, that is political, and it is very badly political, because like it or not, I’m the bellwether for political censorship.

The megalomania of this guy.

 

[CuzinEd]

lol, beyond parody.

The megalomania of this guy.

Imagine going to a normie platform saying shit that isn't normie platform friendly and you get banned. Then you do surprise Pikachu face and have a fucking fit because you were banned.

 

[BOTTOM TEXT]

Off topic/genuine question
Which MM records I should listen to that you consider superior to The Bends-->Amnesiac?

Their first three, This Is a Long Drive for Someone With Nothing to Think About is my favorite (and Anglin's, to keep it on-topic.. I think he has a Modest Mouse tattoo?).
I think I would still enjoy The Bends. I actually used to like Radiohead a lot. Maybe I'm just getting old but Thom Yorke being a crybaby and the pretentiousness of Kid A and beyond makes them hard to listen to.

Also, those cringey NAFO faggots know about him and they are pretty big group of terminally online faggots that cheer for Ukraine. They are like vatniggers but instead of Russia it's Ukraine.

What an albatross those faggots are. Low-IQ shitlibs who spam the worst memes I've ever seen.

I was right, he posted shit about women and caught a ban for it. Of course this lead him to do what he always does. Claim it's not his fault. "This bodes very poorly for Elon Musk's Twitter". Yes, it bodes poorly because you couldn't stop acting like a fucking retard. Now it's someone else's fault and not his. Anglin claims what he posted didn't break the rules. He claims this is political. It's not because he is a fucking retard. No, that can't be it. Like a nigger claiming racism for everything. It's a political witch hunt against me. It's not because I behaved like a fucking tard.

It's like, yeah I probably would have gotten away with this with my 126 followers, but I'm also not known as a neo-Nazi blogger who got sued for harassing a woman, nor do I have a bunch of people hate-following me and reporting all my posts. These are things you must consider. But I'm sure he's not too unhappy about this, he can whine about censorship again and has an excuse to play vidya all day.

April 10:

Send Monero to pay for Anglin's remedial math class.

 

[Gary the Cryptofascist]

I think something should be said about Anglin's recent ban on Twitter.

You see, Anglin tries to portray himself as a "free speech absolutist", but only by the political definition of free speech. If you can even make that distinction and still call yourself an "absolutist" is an entire discussion for itself.
Anyway, he always said that free speech doesn't include obscenity. With obscenity he mostly refered to porn, but also to the writings of scandalous and controversial authors like Alan Ginsberg.
Sure, it would be Reddit-tier to point out that "obscenity" is a very vague term that could mean different things to different people at different times and in different cultures - but this would still be correct.

Here are some examples of him saying that. His stupid website seems to be down right now, so I had to rely on https://dss.coincidencedetector.com/

As you can see, he clearly made that point a couple of times.

So just forget about the Reddit-tier "but you can't properly define obscenity" thing for a moment... I think most of us are from the US or Europe, so we all probably have similar concepts of what we think is obscene.

And now read the coomer-tier shit Anglin was banned for. I would say, this was an obscene post. Basically pornographic with it's explicit description of blowjob, ejaculation, vomit and whatever.

So by Anglin's own standards this post wasn't free speech but obscenity. The motherfucker just got hanged on his own (alleged) prinicples and of course he's now whining about it and plays the "I am the most opressed/censored person in the history of the universe" record again.

He's just so full of shit, nothing he says should be taken serious.

And irregardless if it was obscene or not, someone who is apparently some die hard Christian nationalist shouldn't really post shit like that. Remember that the guy is pushing 40 and posts some coomer shit like a teenager.... which also makes him look like some incel loser who gets super bitter as soon as he sees someone posting pics of his girlfriend in a bikini lol.

EDIT: Finally could access his website. Here some direct quotes of him saying that obscenity is not free speech:

https://dailystormer.in/china-shuts-down-4000-websites-to-defend-family-values/

But well, feel free to search for it on the DSS Coincedence Detector, you will find enough examples of him making that distinction between protected free speech and obscenity.

 

[CuzinEd]

@Boji

What an albatross those faggots are. Low-IQ shitlibs who spam the worst memes I've ever seen.

The video I posted is the most laziest Boomer tier cringe inducing shit I have ever seen. It can't possibly be made by anyone under the age 40. The video wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't stuck those gay fucking dogs in it. The music is still shit. But you could at least watch the video maybe even turn the sound down. These NAFO faggots don't know how to meme. No wonder their videos have low view counts, and the channel has hardly any subscribers. All they are doing is ruining good war porn with their faggotry.

It's like, yeah I probably would have gotten away with this with my 126 followers, but I'm also not known as a neo-Nazi blogger who got sued for harassing a woman, nor do I have a bunch of people hate-following me and reporting all my posts. These are things you must consider. But I'm sure he's not too unhappy about this, he can whine about censorship again and has an excuse to play vidya all day.

Anglin is basically doing a white version of the niggers "I dindu nuffin". Proving that Anglin is just a white nigger.

Yeah, make yourself a well known target and go around acting like a fucking tard. Then act surprised when you get banned. The well known retard got caught doing retarded shit and was reported and banned. Shocking stuff.

Send Monero to pay for Anglin's remedial math class.

Nothing will help that broke brain retard. Anyone sending him money is just as retarded as he is.
@Gary the Cryptofascist

You see, Anglin tries to portray himself as a "free speech absolutist", but only by the political definition of free speech. If you can even make that distinction and still call yourself an "absolutist" is an entire discussion for itself.
Anyway, he always said that free speech doesn't include obscenity. With obscenity he mostly refered to porn, but also to the writings of scandalous and controversial authors like Alan Ginsberg.
Sure, it would be Reddit-tier to point out that "obscenity" is a very vague term that could mean different things to different people at different times and in different cultures - but this would still be correct.

Don't believe that shit for a second. He isn't for free speech. He banned me and all I did was tell him and the other retards on the forum that Russia was losing. He banned other people as well for even less. Don't believe for a second that Anglin is pro free speech because he isn't. He is just another faggot that wants to run around and say whatever he wants without facing any actions while banning people from his own echo chamber. Like the leftist faggots that used to run Twitter. He is a hypocrite, and no one likes hypocrites. He goes around talking about free speech this and free speech that while he bans people from his own forum and keeps the place private so no one can make an account they don't review first.

When he gets banned and starts whining about his free speech rights being violated just laugh at him. He violated plenty of other people's right to free speech. He didn't allow them to have their rights and he doesn't deserve any either.

 

[Berrakh]

While we languish under Liz Fong Jones’ attempts to get their “consent accident” expunged from the digital record I’d like everyone to remember that Anglin thinks Trannies are based. His hatred for women is so irrational he sides with them out of instinct.

If you sincerely want a Fourth Reich you’ll need to undergo a process of DeAnglinification in your extreme right wing movement.

 

[Homunculi First]

Seeing as Anglin is currently flip-flopping all over the place regarding his presidential endorsements this is a good time to take a walk down memory lane in order to show that he doesn't mean a thing he writes. I've always suspected that his pro-Harvey Weinstein stance was mere contrivance and I recently stumbled upon some circumstantial evidence to support that.

I'm not embarrassed to admit that I used to really enjoy the Stormer (I remember my first article there in which some misfortune befell a traveler to the Amazon and they posted a big picture of Nelson Muntz saying "Hah-hah!" after the description of it and I wasn't able to control my laughter) but I am embarrassed to say that I kept a huge text document of their articles. OTOH it is a bit of internet history, so let's take a look at what Peter Panglin of the Lost Catboys was saying about #metoo as it was unfolding:

Spoiler: First Article

NYT Kikes Attack Glorious Metoo Movement!

The Jews created feminism. It was their idea, largely, to force women out of the home and into public life. It has been an entire disaster for everyone involved.

So this ideology that they created came to it’s obvious conclusion – women using claims of “sexual harassment” to purge the ruling class of men – and now they’re freaking out because they are the ruling class and all of their people are the ones getting purged.

The NYT has published a shocking admission by the Jewess Daphne Merkin stating very clearly that they do not want to keep purging people, and that they have to do something to stop the metoo movement from overthrowing the Jewish ruling class.

New York Times:

You can be sure that this weekend at the Golden Globes, Hollywood celebrities, not exactly known for their independent thinking, will turn the red carpet into a #MeToo moment replete with designer duds. Many have promised to wear black dresses to protest the stream of allegations against industry moguls and actors. Perhaps Meryl Streep will get grilled — again — about what she knew about Harvey Weinstein. The rest of us will diligently follow along on Twitter, sharing hashtags and suitably pious opprobrium.

Just the start of that – these Jews are shoving the opinions of Hollywood celebrities down our throats nonstop, effectively claiming that we have to agree with them because they are famous. But here a top Jewess, writing for the top Jewish paper, admits they are people who just believe whatever they are told to believe.

Because she is here writing for an “intellectual” audience.

But privately, I suspect, many of us, including many longstanding feminists, will be rolling our eyes, having had it with the reflexive and unnuanced sense of outrage that has accompanied this cause from its inception, turning a bona fide moment of moral accountability into a series of ad hoc and sometimes unproven accusations.

Since when have the claims of women needed “proof,” Jews?

@HillaryClinton
Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.

I thought it was a moral imperative to always believe any accusation ever made by a woman against a man, because false accusations basically never happen ever?

For many weeks now, the conversation that has been going on in private about this reckoning is radically different from the public one. This is not a good sign, suggesting the sort of social intimidation that is the underside of a culture of political correctness, such as we are increasingly living in.

Wow, intimidated by feminism, Jews?

You poor poor poor poor dears.

The women I know — of all ages — have responded by and large with a mixture of slightly horrified excitement (bordering on titillation) as to who will be the next man accused and overt disbelief.

Perhaps even more troubling is that we seem to be returning to a victimology paradigm for young women, in particular, in which they are perceived to be — and perceive themselves to be — as frail as Victorian housewives.

Returning to that?

As if this wasn’t what everything has been leading up to this entire time?

The only thing we hear more often than how empowered and equal women are is how vulnerable and powerless they are. Of course, it is convenient to pick and choose which narrative to use, and women themselves are so stupid they are incapable of grasping that these two narratives are being simultaneously promoted as if they are compatible with one another (men being afraid to ever question anything related to feminism), but you can’t just pretend that you never promoted this, Jews.

The fact that such unwelcome advances persist, and often in the office, is, yes, evidence of sexism and the abusive power of the patriarchy. But I don’t believe that scattershot, life-destroying denunciations are the way to upend it. In our current climate, to be accused is to be convicted. Due process is nowhere to be found.

Bitch where were you during Mattress Girl?

If you were concerned about due process in female accusations, you should have spoken up about that in the 70s.

The concept of women being above reproach and unquestionable shouldn’t have sneaked up on you. Men have been having their lives destroyed by lying sluts for a very, very long time.

And what exactly are men being accused of? What is the difference between harassment and assault and “inappropriate conduct”? There is a disturbing lack of clarity about the terms being thrown around and a lack of distinction regarding what the spectrum of objectionable behavior really is. Shouldn’t sexual harassment, for instance, imply a degree of hostility? Is kissing someone in affection, however inappropriately, or showing someone a photo of a nude male torso necessarily predatory behavior?

You tell me, Jew.

You invented this shit to terrorize us.

No one can explain it but you.

I think this confusion reflects a deeper ambivalence about how we want and expect people to behave. Expressing sexual interest is inherently messy and, frankly, nonconsensual — one person, typically the man, bites the bullet by expressing interest in the other, typically the woman — whether it happens at work or at a bar. Some are now suggesting that come-ons need to be constricted to a repressive degree. Asking for oral consent before proceeding with a sexual advance seems both innately clumsy and retrograde, like going back to the childhood game of “Mother, May I?” We are witnessing the re-moralization of sex, not via the Judeo-Christian ethos but via a legalistic, corporate consensus.

LOL.

Where’s the lie?

Jews complaining about their own agenda being implemented is GOLDEN.

These are scary times, for women as well as men. There is an inquisitorial whiff in the air, and my particular fear is that in true American fashion, all subtlety and reflection is being lost. Next we’ll be torching people for the content of their fantasies.

Yes, of course we will.

Because nothing ever ends with you people.

Watching you squirm after getting hit with your own deranged system is the greatest thing I’ve ever witnessed.

But go ahead.

Try to stop the metoo train – because you cannot. There are a lot more sluts than there are Jews, and sluts have been taught from birth that all the power in the world is theirs. And they’ve decided to seize that power.

Spoiler: Second Article

Evil Kike Wizard David Copperfield (David Seth Kotkin) Getting Metooed All to Hell

Something like 85% of high-profile metooings have been against JEWS.

Jews being only 2% of the US population, they are over represented 40-fold.

And yet, thus far the Jewish media have kept their lips sealed on the issue. They have not yet accused all of these women of being anti-Semitic. They haven’t even bothered to quote me as saying that the metoo movement will bring down the Jewish power structure once and for all.

Because they know, on some level, that by doing that all they will do is draw attention to the fact that these people are all Jews, and they do not think that these molester Jews are particularly sympathetic characters.

At the same time, Jews are pretty much incapable of NOT accusing anyone who questions them on anything at all of being an anti-Semite. So I guarantee it is coming, eventually. And when it comes, it will be a great opportunity for us in the anti-Semitic movement.

What You Can Do!

Keep going everywhere on the internet and talking about how all of the accused are Jews. Like, people don’t really know that Steve Wynn or David Copperfield are Jews. Keep pointing that out everywhere you can. The more that the Jews see that, the more they will be inclined to come out and accuse the whole Metooist movement of being an anti-Semitic and Neo-Nazi conspiracy against the chosen ones.

I didn't save the dates or authors but those both feel like Andrew the Short, especially when he says "they haven’t even bothered to quote me" in that second piece. What other of their authors got quoted in the press? There's also this episode of the TRS political show, Fash the Nation (I recommend listening to the deep dive on China); at about twelve minutes the co-host mentions that Anglin has concluded that we live in a post-Justice America and so hopes that Weinstein gets found guilty for that alone.

While none of that is a direct citation it's enough in the murky world of online politics to conclude that Anglin is just making this shit up as he goes along. It's topical because it should be clear at this point that Fuentes is nothing more than a mini-me of Richard Spencer and Anglin bounced from one to the other like a trailer park ho going from one baby-daddy to the next.

 

[The Fountainhead]

CuzinEd​

Don't believe that shit for a second. He isn't for free speech. He banned me and all I did was tell him and the other retards on the forum that Russia was losing. He banned other people as well for even less. Don't believe for a second that Anglin is pro free speech because he isn't. He is just another faggot that wants to run around and say whatever he wants without facing any actions while banning people from his own echo chamber. Like the leftist faggots that used to run Twitter. He is a hypocrite, and no one likes hypocrites. He goes around talking about free speech this and free speech that while he bans people from his own forum and keeps the place private so no one can make an account they don't review first.

I was banned from Gamer Uprising about 18 months ago when I began compiling evidence that America First, and especially Nick Fuentes, didn't practice what they preached. I fought a whole pack of rabid Anglinites for over a month and eviscerated the lot of them. In revenge, nine or ten forum members called a meeting (real "official" like) and voted to ban me. Crime? Accusing Nick Fuentes of being a fraud, a fake Christian, and a nigger-loving piece of lying shit who listens to nigger rap all day long and gets nothing done. Now Gamer Uprising is all but dead. But the few members that are left have one thing that keeps them going: a burning hatred for Kiwi Farms.

 

[Sphere]

Anglin posts about Twitter's new CEO, makes it about himself

https://dailystormer.in/total-doom-elon-hires-used-up-old-slut-to-run-twitter-jew-lover/ (a)

Spoiler: Article

Elon Musk has reportedly hired the rough old bitch Linda Yaccarino as the CEO of Twitter.
People who have viewed her photos have called her “an old school road dog,” “a rough rider,” and a “harsh cunt.”
It’s pretty clear that there is no freedom of speech on Twitter, actually, and there is in fact a secret ban list. People are saying that I got banned for a pornographic joke, but Kevin MacDonald, a retired university professor, got banned the same day. He didn’t joke about giving some dude’s wife a brutal facial!
This road dog Yaccarino is a known Jew lover.

She was also a mask nag and hardcore virus hoaxster.

Look at my new Twitter CEO dawg, we’re never getting free speech pic.twitter.com/JnQHHwTSGy
— Esoteric Shaggyism (@EsoShaggy) May 12, 2023

She’s slurping up brown cock under the “diversity” scam.

In 2018 Twitter’s new CEO Linda Yaccarino went to DAVOS calling for “diversity”!
Linda explains not only is it the “right thing”, but it’s “good for business”.
According to Linda, if you don’t believe in unabashed diversity you’re simply not awake! pic.twitter.com/r8MBpH57T8
— Esoteric Shaggyism (@EsoShaggy) May 12, 2023

I’m sure she did all the other bad things you can think of. I mean, this is just a standard AWFL.
I didn’t look up what her former job was. I don’t really care. Whatever the job was, she got it by sucking dick.
If Elon wanted a woman CEO, he had other options. Especially these days.

I think the game is up…!
Elon made some kind of deal to get the advertisers back by promising them “it won’t be that bad” and accepting a secret ban list. That’s why I was banned. That’s why all these other people are banned. There is no connection between the banned, other than that the ADL doesn’t like them.
This bitch is supposed to take over in a few months and ruin everyone’s life.
Elon is denying this obvious reality.

Whatever.
I don’t care.
I’ve been banned from everything for a long time.
Being on Twitter for three months was interesting. I would say the biggest thing (actually the only thing) I learned is that every single person who disagrees with me is worthless scum. I didn’t ban anyone. I was letting everyone take free shots at will. I was begging people to take free shots.
What I got was so low level and so retarded that it made me sick, and it totally changed my long-time perception that I need to be open to criticism. No one has any valid criticism.
It is “you should die because you are a Nazi” and “can you please give a detailed explanation of these two sentences you wrote 10 years ago?” There was zero engagement on the issues. It was mostly hohol spam, which was so dumb it actually lowered my IQ to the point where I am no longer capable of solving basic geometry problems.
Meaningful experience. (That’s sarcasm.)
Oh, and I also learned how popular I still am. My account was blowing up. Positive engagement was incredible. With under 30,000 followers, I was getting engagement on par with people with 1 million followers. So I am very popular, because I am right about everything, and my jokes are hilarious.
Other than that, it was a lame fuck-around, and I regret the time I put in, and I feel strongly that Elon Musk owes me $1,000 for every hour I wasted on his site under the false promise I wasn’t going to be banned.
I’m not going to say that Elon isn’t in a tough spot. He obviously is. But he shouldn’t have made these promises and then backed out, and if he did back out – as he has backed out – he should explain it instead of going on about nonexistent “transparency.”

"every single person who disagrees with me is worthless scum."
"With under 30,000 followers, I was getting engagement on par with people with 1 million followers."
"I am right about everything"
""my jokes are hilarious"

I'm starting to think every time he does that usual bit, he's not trying to convience his audience, he's trying to convince himself. Obviously, if he believed all of that, he wouldn't need to repeat it like a mantra every few days. And it also serves as a justification of why his website's going down the shitter, i.e.: "These stupid babies just won't listen, fuck them, anyway, I'm the one who's right all the time"

 

[Retribution]

I was banned from Gamer Uprising

They probably banned you for shitting up their threads.

 

[The Fountainhead]

They probably you for shitting up their threads.

Why, no - ASSHOLE - since they were threads started by me.

 

[Retribution]

Why, no - ASSHOLE - since they were threads started by me

Then they banned you for creating shit threads.

 

[The Fountainhead]

Then they banned you for creating shit threads.

Wrong, fuckface - they banned me because I was right - backing up everything I said with receipts. Let me guess: you're a supporter of Nick Fuentes, Ethan Ralph, and America First. If so, go be a nigger somewhere else.

Lolcow Crossover. RPG compares Anglin to fat feminists.
View attachment 4957592
Twatter

It's a good comparison, stupid - since both fucktards make a habit out lying.

 

[Retribution]

Wrong, fuckface - they banned me because I was right

Go back to Plebbit. You're too stupid to post here.

 

[The Fountainhead]

Go back to Plebbit. You're too stupid to post here.

 

[Retribution]

Right Wing Watch notices Anglin for the first time in years.

He probably thinks this makes him relevant.
Twatter
Archive

 

[CuzinEd]

While we languish under Liz Fong Jones’ attempts to get their “consent accident” expunged from the digital record I’d like everyone to remember that Anglin thinks Trannies are based. His hatred for women is so irrational he sides with them out of instinct.

If you sincerely want a Fourth Reich you’ll need to undergo a process of DeAnglinification in your extreme right wing movement.

Anglin has been retarded for years now. His take on women and the white sharia thing was just cringey.

Anyone who seriously thinks they can establish a Fourth Reich is some kind of basement dwelling autistic retard. You wouldn't want people like that near your political or social movement. They would fuck it up in a heart beat and then blame Jews. That's what the wignats did to the alt-right.

I was banned from Gamer Uprising about 18 months ago when I began compiling evidence that America First, and especially Nick Fuentes, didn't practice what they preached. I fought a whole pack of rabid Anglinites for over a month and eviscerated the lot of them. In revenge, nine or ten forum members called a meeting (real "official" like) and voted to ban me. Crime? Accusing Nick Fuentes of being a fraud, a fake Christian, and a nigger-loving piece of lying shit who listens to nigger rap all day long and gets nothing done. Now Gamer Uprising is all but dead. But the few members that are left have one thing that keeps them going: a burning hatred for Kiwi Farms.

I was banned because I told them Russia was losing in Ukraine. Anglin only wants free speech for himself and no one else. He is the kind of retarded shitbag that wants to go around and spout stupid shit and not have anyone tell him he's a dumb fuck. It's not hard to get banned off a forum ran by Anglin. Just say shit he doesn't agree with. Question his stupid shit. Then it's ban hammer time.

Right Wing Watch notices Anglin for the first time in years.
View attachment 5128435
View attachment 5128436
He probably thinks this makes him relevant.
Twatter
Archive

A leftist retard finally notices a cringey moron who has been sliding into irrelevancy for years. It doesn't mean much. These are the kind of leftist retards that think the alt-right is still a thing.

 

[Anne Hyroe]

Richard Spencer and Anglin bounced from one to the other like a trailer park ho going from one baby-daddy to the next.

Or from one step-daddy to the next, as is alt-right tradition