Anger from voice actors as NSFW mods use AI deepfakes to replicate their voices: 'This is NOT okay.'

Source via PCGamer
Archive

A slew of pornographic mods on the Nexus Mods website has caused mounting anger in the voice acting community. As reported by Gamesradar, Twitter user Robbie92_ has posted a list of Skyrim voice actors who have had their voices used against their will for NSFW mods, earlier this week.

1688740251212.png


These actors include April Stewart, who in addition to multiple characters in Skyrim, is the voice of Petra Venj in Destiny 2 and Jessamine Kaldwin in Dishonoured 2; Jon Curry, who voiced Zevran in Dragon Age: Origins; and Susan Eisenberg, who has voiced Wonder Woman in both animation and video games since 2001.

The National Association of Voice Actors tweeted in response: "The damage to voice actors and game companies by AI and synthetic voices is real and tangible," proceeding to tag both Bethesda Studios and Zenimax Online, writing: "voice actors don't have the legal ability to fight this, but you can help."

The wider voice acting community has also rallied to decry the mods. Linsay Rousseau of Transformers: War for Cybertron, Deathloop, and Fallout 76 quote tweeted: "Voice Actors don't consent to this. If you're using these mods, you're stealing & abusing our work."

Jennifer Hale, voice of Commander Shepard in the Mass Effect Series, also tweeted: "to make this CRYSTAL clear: if you do not have written permission to use my voice, you DO NOT HAVE PERMISSION to use my voice, including AI use."

Meanwhile Abbey Veffer, who voices a host of characters in The Elder Scrolls Online and Genshin Impact, wrote: "I do not, and never will, consent to my voice being used for AI synthesis, cloning, deepfakes, etc. This is NOT okay."

Robbie92_ has also been doing considerable work via a google document to assemble a list of mods "that use AI cloning to produce non-consensual pornographic content" for the purposes of spreading awareness and reporting them, an exhaustive task that April Stewart thanked them for. "The Google doc was particularly helpful when I contacted my agent and also requested the content be taken down."

I reached out to Robbie92_ to ask about their work, and I'll update this article if I hear back from them.

Voice actors clearly shouldn't have to spend hours of their day browsing Nexus Mods just to protect themselves, and I can't even imagine the amount of time, money, and labour that would need to be poured into fighting this kind of AI use en-masse, and Nexus Mods' current attitude towards AI-generated work on their platform doesn't make matters easier.

They've stated these mods "may be removed if we receive a credible complaint from an affected creator/rights holder", but considering there's an entire live document dedicated to tracking these things, I can't see that being a satisfying solution for anybody involved.
 
I do see an issue if someone takes genuine recordings and trains their model on that. That I think would be in the grey zone and could possibly be banned.
The question is whether AI voice generation is a transformative work or not. The DMCA's intent is to allow fair use, but with very little leeway if you're doing something that may cause consumer confusion about whether something comes from the rights holder or not.

AI is an especially confusing violation of this principle, and especially for voice actors. In my opinion, it is not a transformative work. I see no reason why voices wouldn't fall under the standard "likeness" protections other depictions of people enjoy (although likeness rights have become super distorted; there's a few Jews who own the rights to like Elvis and Marilyn Monroe and they sue the shit out of everyone because they're greedy kikes).

This is objectively different from, like, Twitter claiming that OpenAI using tweets to train is a violation of copyright. ChatGPT's output is totally different from what Twitter offers. It gets a little murky when you're profiting off of the transformed work, but I doubt Twitter wins that case.

That being said, it's still funny as fuck and I hope these gay little voice actors chill out before the companies they work for decide they're too much trouble.
 
using ai voices to make your coomer mods because you are horny < using ai voices to make super cool ass new stories to games that need more content
You got it backwards. It's ">".

It's gross and cringe.

As someone who is a big fan of voice acting... I just think it's horrible if the person directly says I do not want this I never said this and people jeer at them.

It's one of those rare moments when I'm gonna side with the leftists on this.
Hey buddy I think you got the wrong site, reddit's two doors down.
 
Last edited:
I am a pirate, Fuck Copyright with a 20 rice long chinese penis.

That said, if it isn't directly monetised or fakely advertised, what?

It isn't them, it is an imitation. If I sounded like Trump, could he sue me for copyright? Retarded.

These bitches are just salty for not getting paid for doing nothing. Shepard the coomgirl lol takes any type of cock an alien has, but an ai saying batarians are 4 eyed space niggers is too much? Choke on these calibrations!
 
In my opinion, it is not a transformative work. I see no reason why voices wouldn't fall under the standard "likeness" protections other depictions of people enjoy
I'd rather not have a world in which MC Jarbo can get sued for his tracks, thanks.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: make_it_so
Back