Culture Anohni on Future Feminism: 'Trump is just a distraction from the core issues' - The future is female!

Source

LB0veVw.jpg


In February, in her first speech after the inauguration of Trump, Hillary Clinton made the declaration that “despite all the challenges you face, I remain convinced that yes, the future is female”.

It was a bittersweet moment for Anohni, the musician and artist who formerly performed as the Mercury prize-winning Antony and the Johnsons. Three years earlier she, and four fellow artists, used the phrase “the future is female” as a central tenet of their Future Feminism manifesto, even carving it into stone for a controversial exhibition in New York that year.

“She’s totally misrepresented and appropriated our work, but that’s how culture works now,” says Anohni on Clinton’s use of “the future is female” as a headline-grabbing talking point. Some have pointed out the phrase has been before, as a T-shirt slogan in the 1970s that was later reused by Cara Delevingne and others; Anohni insists they came up with it organically. “Our work was stolen and upstreamed, and here it is, coming out of the mouth of Hillary Clinton, who is just capitalising on a woman’s movement to get support for her neo-liberal agenda. The empowerment is brilliant, but the connectivity is lost.”

Yet, as she replays the clip of Clinton again and again, Anohni also looks pleased that the work of “five scruffy artists” has found its way into popular political rhetoric. “I watch it 10 times a day,” she says with a wry smile.

Having made its divisive debut at The Hole gallery in New York in 2014, Anohni and artists Johanna Constantine and Kembra Pfahler, who all met in the fringe New York art scene in the 90s, are debuting Future Feminism in Europe , as part of the European Capital of Culture programme in Aarhus, Denmark.


She has never shied away from political issues, with subjects on her most recent album (which won her both Mercury and Brit award nominations) including drone warfare, Guantánamo Bay, surveillance, torture and ecological destruction. Anohni resists Future Feminism being described as a movement, but its manifesto, and the exhibition, is focused around 13 tenets which take on misogyny and the patriarchal systems that govern the world.


“Those powers are much more comfortable with women complaining about abortion; black people protesting about violence against black children and black men on the streets; gay people fussing; trans people fussing,” she says. “They are much more comfortable with us all being divided and conquered, and no one talking about the money – and it’s the money that is the bottom line.”

The tenets, carved on large spheres of rose quartz, include “Enforce a global standard for the rights and ethical treatment of women”; “Advocate for feminine systems in all areas of governance”; “Relieve men of their roles as protectors and predators”; and “Deconstruct the mythology of male spiritual supremacy”.

It is time, they argue, that feminine values such as empathy and compassion – which have long been seen as weaknesses, and impediments to power – take precedence in our society, not only to ensure the ethical treatment of women but also to stop the imminent collapse of the earth’s bioversity due to climate change. As the first tenet of Future Feminism states: “The subjugation of women and the earth is one and the same
Anohni, who has identified as transgender since childhood and was previously known as Antony Hegarty, has spoken about how her involvement in Future Feminism was a key part of her decision to identify as “she” rather than “he”. Indeed, she is scathing about the current trend towards embracing a non-gender binary world, where neither masculinity or femininity is acknowledged or valued.

“This whole fantasy of this gender neutral oasis in the middle between the genders has been incredibly disempowering,” she said. “They’ve exchanged the female creative hub of life with this secular gender-neutral lump that we are all staring at and don’t have a relationship to.”

The world is a very different place from three years ago when they first introduced Future Feminism to the world, but Anohni is dubious that recent events – such as the global women’s marches, the rise of women in positions of political influence and the renewed conversation around feminism that is happening in popular culture – have really changed anything. The reverence of masculine values remains unchanged, she argues, and women continue to be oppressed while the temperature of our planet continues to rise.

“We weren’t a knee-jerk response to an inflammatory provocation like Trump, which is in my mind just as much of a distraction from the core issues as it is a genuine call to arms,” she says. “It’s amazing how we leap into action like lemmings when Trump screams about grabbing a pussy. But actually all the machinations that led to the rise of someone like Trump were very much in place already during the Obama administration.”

Both Pfahler and Constantine nodded. “It almost feels like they just keep tossing us a bone so we shut up and let them continue with business as usual,” said Constantine. “So as exciting as it is to see feminism springing up, I still look at it as a veil over their misogyny and if you pull off that veil, there’s still the same corrupt, rotten, toxic systems under it. It’s not enough, so this exhibition feels just as important to me, just as critical to me, even more so, in light of what’s happening now.”

Pfahler took an even more cynical view of the way that the recent resurgence of feminism had already been appropriated. “You can see a lot of the capitalist tables are now sitting around thinking: ‘What can we do to monetise feminism? Everyone’s talking about feminism, why don’t we make a Margaret Atwood TV show?’”

Anohni and her fellow artists were criticised by feminist groups and artists in 2014 when they first launched their manifesto, for seeing themselves as the “future of feminism”, something Anohni said was never their intention. They have no set agenda about how they will instigate the changes they are advocating, but believe that through this high-profile exhibition, the ideas of Future Feminism will move from the fringes and into people’s homes and spheres of influence; as well as the quartz sculptures, the exhibition features talks with guests such as radical feminist group FEMEN and the founding member of the Swedish Feminist Party. The trio are also adamant that men are as central to their vision as women, and that it is essential that men adopt and promote feminine values as much as women.

While they cite Clinton as evidence that the ethos of Future Feminism can trickle out beyond the underground art scene, none are optimistic that anything is changing. In fact, as punk and alternative performance artists in their 40s and 50s – whose fate was to “make extreme artwork, don’t talk to anyone and then die young in some dramatic, high fashion way” – they all agreed it was a miracle they were even still alive.

“Can we make a difference? I don’t know,” says Anohni. “You see what I am, you see what we are. We’re not groomed for this; we were groomed to die.”

I agree with Anohni about the media cashing in on modern feminism, but I don't really buy her ecological feminist paradise proposal, either.

All of her music is about this now; crying about how the world is dying ecologically due to men.

If only Norman Burlog was trans.
 
What a convenient way to gain press coverage while also pushing your ideology further.
But Clinton is about as "artistically inspiring" as a plate of old oatmeal, political comics not withstanding.
 
How did I miss that the Antony of the Johnsons was a laaaaaaaaaaaaaady now?

She transitioned fully a couple of years ago. Recorded another Antony album and then the Anohni album.

The Anohni album is full of crying over how bad Obama was and how she wants there to never be another violent man again. She sings the same, though (very well).
 
A troon claiming the future is female, if it wasn't laughable enough already after all the resultant bullshit, is about as laughable as Clayton Bigsby if he was real.
The future is female, respect the future’s girlcock and mind its pronouns.

Also glad Hilldawg bounced back and is still trying to pass off her sketchy political career as feminism-something-something.
 
The best thing Trump ever did was steal the thunder out from under feminism

Who can get worked up about wage gap when orange Hitler is in power?

Thanks to the MSM's undying hatred of The Don they keep him front page center and now relegate all the progressive crap fests to the back page.

Just one more thing to thank the Big Man for!
 
The future never comes.

I agree with Anohni about the media cashing in on modern feminism, but I don't really buy her ecological feminist paradise proposal, either.

All of her music is about this now; crying about how the world is dying ecologically due to men.

"Anohni" is a man, and men tend to have bizarre fantasies about women. They think flowers will bloom on the ground a woman walks.

Tell a woman you won't give her a diamond ring because the gold and diamond industies are extremely damaging to the environment, and see how much she cares.
 
Last edited:
The future never comes.



"Anohni" is a man, and men tend to have bizarre fantasies about women. They think flowers will bloom on the ground a woman walks.

Tell a woman you won't give her a diamond ring because the gold and diamond industies are extremely damaging to the environment, and see how much she cares.

And when they BECOME women and those fantasies don't happen, everything falls apart.
 
Tell a woman you won't give her a diamond ring because the gold and diamond industies are extremely damaging to the environment, and see how much she cares.
Last time I brought up rings I was told I'd be an idiot for buying diamonds anyways and listened to her go on about why gold has better value. Women truly are fascinating creatures.
 
Last edited:
Source

LB0veVw.jpg




I agree with Anohni about the media cashing in on modern feminism, but I don't really buy her ecological feminist paradise proposal, either.

All of her music is about this now; crying about how the world is dying ecologically due to men.

If only Norman Burlog was trans.

Did anyone else though these were Klingon women at first?

hqdefault (2).jpg
 
i guess that means traps are going to be thing. i for one welcome our new femboy overlords (this is a joke, i seriously think this has gone out of hand in terms of feminism evolving from a well meaning movement to a man hating organization that wants turn men into girly boys)
 
I get tired of that rhetoric that good and selfless qualities like compassion and empathy are inherently "feminine" as if that means anything.

Just because cultures might promote aggression in men and nurturing in women does not mean women "own" compassion and men can only borrow it. That ugly attitude is every bit as prejudiced as pseudoscience shit like phrenology that claims the negro brain can't comprehend higher concepts like the caucusoid brain can. And more directly, it gives ammunition to the evil patriarchy that wants to use presumed innate gender differences to promote inequity in the first place!
 
I get tired of that rhetoric that good and selfless qualities like compassion and empathy are inherently "feminine" as if that means anything.

Just because cultures might promote aggression in men and nurturing in women does not mean women "own" compassion and men can only borrow it. That ugly attitude is every bit as prejudiced as pseudoscience shit like phrenology that claims the negro brain can't comprehend higher concepts like the caucusoid brain can. And more directly, it gives ammunition to the evil patriarchy that wants to use presumed innate gender differences to promote inequity in the first place!
I'm not sure about that. Like, people say that women, on average, are better with language* than men are, and men, on average, are better with math than women are. While society has a huge influence on this, I don't know if we can entirely rule out biological influences quite yet.

It's certainly possible that because of specialization of different parts of the brain and how male brains differ compared to female brains, gendered differences will show up statistically on a large scale. I think the jury's still out on that one.

But that aside, labeling language as "feminine" and math as "masculine", smacks of a really poorly hidden political motivation. When I see that in someone's writing, I immediately start skimming the rest of the article for their biases, so I can get to their punchline, whatever it is. Because I'm sure it's going to be stupid. "How can men be superior if they can't even speak well? Checkmate misogynists!"

Well, and of course, how these features (math aptitude vs language aptitude) are distributed don't mean that either group "owns" anything. A man who's good with language was born that way. He's not betraying his nature or any silly nonsense than that. He didn't need to borrow anything. And he's still just as much of a man as any other man. If these biological differences exist, we're talking about averages on the scale of literally billions of people.

* I don't actually know what it means to be "better at language" though. Are we talking about comfort in using language? Efficacy in applying language? How do you measure this? I don't necessarily dispute it, because I don't think men get something (better mathematical aptitude) for nothing. But I am curious as to how they experimentally test this stuff.
 
Back