EU AP: Google to expand misinformation 'prebunking' in Europe - Together with traditional journalism, content moderation and other methods of combating misinformation, prebunking could help communities reach a kind of herd immunity when it comes to misinformation, limiting its spread and impact.

Google to expand misinformation 'prebunking' in Europe
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By David Klepper
2023-02-13 10:52:54GMT

WASHINGTON (AP) — After seeing promising results in Eastern Europe, Google will initiate a new campaign in Germany that aims to make people more resilient to the corrosive effects of online misinformation.

The tech giant plans to release a series of short videos highlighting the techniques common to many misleading claims. The videos will appear as advertisements on platforms like Facebook, YouTube or TikTok in Germany. A similar campaign in India is also in the works.

It’s an approach called prebunking, which involves teaching people how to spot false claims before they encounter them. The strategy is gaining support among researchers and tech companies.

“There’s a real appetite for solutions,” said Beth Goldberg, head of research and development at Jigsaw, an incubator division of Google that studies emerging social challenges. “Using ads as a vehicle to counter a disinformation technique is pretty novel. And we’re excited about the results.”

While belief in falsehoods and conspiracy theories isn’t new, the speed and reach of the internet has given them a heightened power. When catalyzed by algorithms, misleading claims can discourage people from getting vaccines, spread authoritarian propaganda, foment distrust in democratic institutions and spur violence.

It’s a challenge with few easy solutions. Journalistic fact checks are effective, but they’re labor intensive, aren’t read by everyone, and won’t convince those already distrustful of traditional journalism. Content moderation by tech companies is another response, but it only drives misinformation elsewhere, while prompting cries of censorship and bias.

Prebunking videos, by contrast, are relatively cheap and easy to produce and can be seen by millions when placed on popular platforms. They also avoid the political challenge altogether by focusing not on the topics of false claims, which are often cultural lightning rods, but on the techniques that make viral misinformation so infectious.

Those techniques include fear-mongering, scapegoating, false comparisons, exaggeration and missing context. Whether the subject is COVID-19, mass shootings, immigration, climate change or elections, misleading claims often rely on one or more of these tricks to exploit emotions and short-circuit critical thinking.

Last fall, Google launched the largest test of the theory so far with a prebunking video campaign in Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The videos dissected different techniques seen in false claims about Ukrainian refugees. Many of those claims relied on alarming and unfounded stories about refugees committing crimes or taking jobs away from residents.

The videos were seen 38 million times on Facebook, TikTok, YouTube and Twitter — a number that equates to a majority of the population in the three nations. Researchers found that compared to people who hadn’t seen the videos, those who did watch were more likely to be able to identify misinformation techniques, and less likely to spread false claims to others.

The pilot project was the largest test of prebunking so far and adds to a growing consensus in support of the theory.

“This is a good news story in what has essentially been a bad news business when it comes to misinformation,” said Alex Mahadevan, director of MediaWise, a media literacy initiative of the Poynter Institute that has incorporated prebunking into its own programs in countries including Brazil, Spain, France and the U.S.

Mahadevan called the strategy a “pretty efficient way to address misinformation at scale, because you can reach a lot of people while at the same time address a wide range of misinformation.”

Google’s new campaign in Germany will include a focus on photos and videos, and the ease with which they can be presented of evidence of something false. One example: Last week, following the earthquake in Turkey, some social media users shared video of the massive explosion in Beirut in 2020, claiming it was actually footage of a nuclear explosion triggered by the earthquake. It was not the first time the 2020 explosion had been the subject of misinformation.

Google will announce its new German campaign Monday ahead of next week’s Munich Security Conference. The timing of the announcement, coming before that annual gathering of international security officials, reflects heightened concerns about the impact of misinformation among both tech companies and government officials.

Tech companies like prebunking because it avoids touchy topics that are easily politicized, said Sander van der Linden, a University of Cambridge professor considered a leading expert on the theory. Van der Linden worked with Google on its campaign and is now advising Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, as well.

Meta has incorporated prebunking into many different media literacy and anti-misinformation campaigns in recent years, the company told The Associated Press in an emailed statement.

They include a 2021 program in the U.S. that offered media literacy training about COVID-19 to Black, Latino and Asian American communities. Participants who took the training were later tested and found to be far more resistant to misleading COVID-19 claims.

Prebunking comes with its own challenges. The effects of the videos eventually wears off, requiring the use of periodic “booster” videos. Also, the videos must be crafted well enough to hold the viewer’s attention, and tailored for different languages, cultures and demographics. And like a vaccine, it’s not 100% effective for everyone.

Google found that its campaign in Eastern Europe varied from country to country. While the effect of the videos was highest in Poland, in Slovakia they had “little to no discernible effect,” researchers found. One possible explanation: The videos were dubbed into the Slovak language, and not created specifically for the local audience.

But together with traditional journalism, content moderation and other methods of combating misinformation, prebunking could help communities reach a kind of herd immunity when it comes to misinformation, limiting its spread and impact.

“You can think of misinformation as a virus. It spreads. It lingers. It can make people act in certain ways,” Van der Linden told the AP. “Some people develop symptoms, some do not. So: if it spreads and acts like a virus, then maybe we can figure out how to inoculate people.”
 
>"[Misinformation is] ...designed to short-circuit critical thinking"
What a fucking sham, right after giving a list of things that need "prebunking". So, when encountering news about a mass shooting that says "we need to ban the 2A NOW NOW NOW!", I'm assuming people will be instructed to think logically about how legally owned guns aren't really the issue here?
Or before any videos on climate change, you'd be instructed to make sure the presenter's links to certain industries - that includes the clean energy sector, anything to do with environmental causes, and the oil industry - are indeed shown front up and not hidden?
Of course, the things that already say what they want won't be prebunked, because it's already been verified™.
Creating context in this way may be even more evil than just straight up censorship. If they actually wanted people thinking critically, they wouldn't be worried about debunking or prebunking or whatever the fuck is next.
The amount of actual facts that are now confirmed which were originally "debunked" as mis/disinformation has proven that these people shouldn't be trusted as stewards. The disproven bullshit the people who are "preventing misinformation" still spew today (Rittenhouse killed black people, Trump pee tapes, Trump Russia, Hunter laptop, practically anything to with covid) proves that their actions aren't borne of incompetence, but outright malice.
 
We’d need a pre pre bunk, then a pre pre pre bunk and eventually we’d end up in an infinite prebunking loop which would result in the destruction of all life as we know it.
Instead of turtles all the way down, we get prebunking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notafederalagent
Google’s new campaign in Germany will include a focus on photos and videos, and the ease with which they can be presented of evidence of something false.
Honestly, I am not surprised it's the Germans. There is something with them and fascism.

They currently have dozens of associations who are sponsored by the government to go through German websites and point out little things like "this could be interpreted as a medical claim", which is against whatever fucking BS law they have.

ETA: I don't mean about only COVID:

if you sell kiwis and you say they are good to get over a cold, you are on the chopping block just the same. You can't imply kiwis can cure the common cold, you don't have a clinical study to back it up. And if you did, Germany would not recognize it anyway, so fuck you.


All claim to be either fighting "white collar crime" or to "protect the consumer" etc.... Shit you can't fundamentally disagree with when you are not directly confronted with the crazy nitpicking.

They will sue you into oblivion or block your shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: queue-anon
Honestly, I am not surprised it's the Germans. There is something with them and fascism.

They currently have dozens of associations who are sponsored by the government to go through German websites and point out little things like "this could be interpreted as a medical claim", which is against whatever fucking BS law they have.

All claim to be either fighting "white collar crime" or to "protect the consumer" etc.... Shit you can't fundamentally disagree with when you are not directly confronted with the crazy nitpicking.

They will sue you into oblivion or block your shit.

It's deeper and older than fascism. It's the eternal Teuton. They are still, deep down, running on Prussian mentality of "Befehl ist Befehl". The whole meme of spending the first decade of the cold war "de-nazifying" Germany never really worked. Sure they stopped being Nazis but they never actually understood what they were being told. They just moved to obeying western liberal democratic values with the same mechanic and autocratic mindset. The russians just replaced nazism with communism and didn't bother. Ironically the east germans nowadays are more likely to actually "get" the point of liberal democracy and the value of freedom. Maybe because they had 40 years to learn the hard way.

Honestly getting rid of Kaiser Wilhelm and the monarchy was a mistake. As bad as Kaiser Bill was and as annoying as the Junkers and german nobility were they at least had a bit more class and were far more honest about their motives and desires. Germany has just been replacing them with cheap copies that are somehow even worse since then.
 
Last edited:
Search generally has become ever more shit with supposed 'based' examples like Duckduckgo as censorious but even now clearly inferior for valid results. And Germans, the eternal police state cucks behind it for Europe, is just so expected.
 
It’s an approach called prebunking, which involves teaching people how to spot false claims before they encounter them.
From the prebunking link:
By focusing on characteristics of misinformation in general instead of specific claims, pre-bunking videos can help a person spot false claims on a wider variety of topics.
So I'm all for this, in theory. If these things are simply showing general methods used to deceive people, then that could be a hilarious double-edged sword for them to slip-up with. Of course even without having seen one of these videos I can already tell that instead they'll be tailored to "current issue" for the sake of optics, so it'd be pretty damn optimistic to expect to see this backfire.

Those techniques include fear-mongering, scapegoating, false comparisons, exaggeration and missing context. Whether the subject is COVID-19, mass shootings, immigration, climate change or elections, misleading claims often rely on one or more of these tricks to exploit emotions and short-circuit critical thinking.
I was going to have some fun showing ironic examples from AP themselves, but (speaking of missing context) it seems like they've memory-holed any articles from over 1-2 years ago - which naturally rules out any really good examples from over half those topics. How lame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: queue-anon
Back