UN AP: UN food chief: Billions needed to avert unrest, starvation - They need $23 billion this year fo dem programs

UN food chief: Billions needed to avert unrest, starvation
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Edith M. Lederer
2023-04-01 01:56:40GMT

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Without billions of dollars more to feed millions of hungry people, the world will see mass migration, destabilized countries, and starving children and adults in the next 12 to 18 months, the head of the Nobel prize-winning U.N. World Food Program warned Friday.

David Beasley praised increased funding from the United States and Germany last year, and urged China, Gulf nations, billionaires and other countries “to step up big time.”

In an interview before he hands the reins of the world’s largest humanitarian organization to U.S. ambassador Cindy McCain next week, the former South Carolina governor said he’s “extremely worried” that WFP won’t raise about $23 billion it needs this year to help millions of needy people

“Right at this stage, I’ll be surprised if we get 40% of it, quite frankly,” he said.

Last year, Beasley raised $14.2 billion for WFP, more than double the $6 billion in 2017, the year he took over as executive director. That money helped over 128 million people in more than 120 countries and territories.

Beasley said he was able to convince the United States last year to increase its funding from about $3.5 billion to $7.4 billion and Germany to raise its contribution from $350 million a few years ago to $1.7 billion, but he doesn’t think they’ll do it again this year.

Other countries need to step up now, he said, starting with China, the world’s second-largest economy which gave WFP just $11 million last year.

Beasley applauded China for its success in substantially reducing hunger and poverty at home, but said it gave less than one cent per person last year compared to the United States, the world’s leading economy, which gave about $22 per person.

China needs “to engage in the multilateral world” and be willing to provide help that is critical, he said. “They have a moral obligation to do so.”

Beasley said they’ve done “an incredible job of feeding their people,” and “now we need their help in other parts of the world” on how they did it, particularly in poorer countries including in Africa.

With high oil prices Gulf countries can also do more, especially Muslim nations that have relations with countries in east Africa, the Sahara and elsewhere in the Middle East, he said, expressing hope they will increase contributions.

Beasley said the wealthiest billionaires made unprecedented profits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and “it’s not too much to ask some of the multibillionaires to step up and help us in the short-term crisis,” even though charity isn’t a long-term solution to the food crisis.

In the long-term, he said what he’d really like to see is billionaires using their experience and success to engage “in the world’s greatest need – and that is food on the planet to feed 8 billion people.”

“The world has to understand that the next 12 to 18 months is critical, and if we back off the funding, you will have mass migration, and you will have destabilization nations and that will all be on top of starvation among children and people around the world,” he warned.

Beasley said WFP was just forced to cut rations by 50% to 4 million people in Afghanistan, and “these are people who are knocking on famine’s door now.”

“We don’t have enough money just to reach the most vulnerable people now,” he said. “So we are in a crisis over the cliff stage right now, where we literally could have hell on earth if we’re not very careful.”

Beasley said he’s been telling leaders in the West and Europe that while they’re focusing everything on Ukraine and Russia, “you better well not forget about what’s south and southeast of you because I can assure you it is coming your way if you don’t pay attention and get on top of it.”

With $400 trillion worth of wealth on the planet, he said, there’s no reason for any child to die of starvation.

The WFP executive director said leaders have to prioritize the humanitarian needs that are going to have the greatest impact on stability in societies around the world.

He singled out several priority places -- Africa’s Sahel region as well as the east including Somalia, northern Kenya, South Sudan and Ethiopia; Syria which is having an impact on Jordan and Lebanon; and Central and South America where the number of people migrating to the United States is now five times what it was a year-and-a-half ago.

Beasley said McCain, the widow of U.S. Senator John McCain from Arizona who was the 2008 Republican presidential nominee and has been the U.S. ambassador to Rome-based WFP and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, “is the right person at the right time” to lead the World Food Program.

They’ve been working together to make sure “she hits the ground running,” he said, But “it’s going to be a very, very challenging time” because of all the money going to the war in Ukraine, and the need to help so many other fragile economies.

Beasley said his biggest surprise was believing in April 2017, when he took over the agency and there were 80 million people in the world “marching to starvation,” that “we could end world hunger and put the World Food Program out of business.”

What he didn’t expect were the conflicts and wars, the climate shocks, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine war, he said, which raised the 80 million in desperate need of food to 135 million right before COVID started spreading in early 2020, to 276 million before Russia invaded Ukraine – “the bread basket of the world” -- in February 2022, and to 350 million now.

Beasley said ”“it’s hard not to get depressed” but two things give him hope.

Seeing little girls and boys smiling in the midst of war and suffering from hunger “inspires you not to give up,” he said, as does the bipartisan support in the often divided U.S. Congress for helping the poorest of the poor around the world.

As he returns to his family in South Carolina, Beasley said his dream remains to end world hunger.
 
So lemme get this straight: just about all Western countries are considering or have already put into place measures to reduce their own populations and food production 'for the good of the planet' but they still should feed the vast, uncontrolled numbers of uneducated, superstitious, war mongering peasants that are incapable of stopping themselves from raping and murdering their neighbours and their own baby daughters for shits and giggles whenever they feel a little bored?

Fuck you.
 
Save the planet, don't have kids
Save the planet, don't eat meat
Save the planet, turn off your power
Save the planet, give up your car

Here's some money for food
Here's some food
Here's more food
Here's more money
Have more kids!
Don't like your shit hole? Here's a ticket to another country!


Hmm. What could be the difference here...

Why do I still have to keep giving money to the same faggots who've been having famines since the 1980's.

We're all tired of the Starving African bullshit when we see them with 25 children and their fighting age men, who are at the most industrious age, are all swarming Europe to fuck white girls.
 
Sorry, couldn't hear you over the sound of sizzling bacon on the grill, which I have as a consequence of living in a functioning country that, despite the best efforts of people like you to turn it into Real Socialism (tm), can sustain itself without guilt-tripping others for handouts.
 
Last edited:
AKA "Give us billions of dollars to line our own pockets, a few million to pushing the agenda on other countries, and a few cents to actually do what we're crying about."
Hey its how virtually every charity has operated for the last 70+ years, why change now?

The reality is that by stripping Africa of its need to be self-sufficient only creates an ever growing loop where the rest of the world needs to spend more money every year to subsidize their poverty riddled existence. If we cut all funding/support, things would be rough for a few years, but Africa would eventually create the industries they need to survive and possibly even thrive on its own.

That or they would destroy themselves, which is still a preferable alternative to the poverty stricken half existence most African's live.
 
Why can't africans just feed themselves or not have too many kids that they cannot feed
Because we keep giving them food, destroying any economic incentive for people to take up industrial farming of the kind required to feed an at-scale population. Industrial farming also requires a relatively educated farmer, and we gleefully all but demand that anyone smarter than a 65IQ emigrate from their home country to the USA so they can make subway sandwiches for obese activists on the cheap.

This applies to more or less every essential good and service in 3rd world countries - We destroy the value of making the good with mass 'donations' that distort the market, and take anyone smart enough to try and do the work anyway.

When you eat donated food, wear donated clothes, live in shanty towns built of donated bricks and heated by donated wood furnaces, charging their refurbished donated electronics with electricity 'borrowed' freely from government infrastructure that's paid for by foreign humanitarian donations, why would you ever need an economy? If you want something better for yourself, leaving becomes the only sensible option.
 
Why cant they feed themself?
You're a racist bigot and you're personally responsible for the care of Africans and other marginalised POC because you're white and you're a direct descendent of colonising white monsters... even if you're not. Stop questioning why your guilt and culpability, and make reparations for the actions of long dead people from countries that don't exist anymore and genetic lines that have died out. Make amends for your whiteness and apologise for your privilege, you racist cishet coloniser. Now hand over your money that you earned with hard work, and give it to a male African nigger who is culturally excluded from working, and is waited on in perpetuity by his multiple genitally mutilated eleven year old wives.
 
Say what you will about 70IQs and unga bunga and whatnot. These people have managed to survive and reproduce over the course of millions of years of evolution, just like the rest of us.

They can fend for themselves, no more handouts.
 
Back