Apple made another programming language - Say something nice about it. POSITIVITY ONLY

im sorry, i didnt realize how problematic errors and exceptions are. it's okay if a variable wants to identify as null, i as an evil cis white man shouldnt try to stop it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: DavidS877 and Anti Snigger
Neo-Nazi Rich Evans said:
the problem with const is nobody ever uses it, especially the people who need to use it the most (pajeets)
Click to expand...
C# has three types of "const" like thing

const : an actual immutable compile time constant. Always static.
readonly : only can be set in constructors.
And { get; init;} for properties which is similar to readonly.

I've seen a lot of projects that don't bother, or use the wrong thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
I TURNED YOUR COMPILER INTO A PICKLE MORTY

What a shitty name, and it conflicts with Python pkl files. Why not call it Orange or some other fruit?

And unless it's some inhouse apple code that they decided to share with devs, I have zero idea what the point is. It's not like you have shortage of those things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
Things are never the same when daddy Steve died, and Jew Cook take over. What even was the point for the blvck svpremvcist corporation's intention at this point? No programmers would try to debunk this amount of scripts that conflicts with Python and other languages similar to it.
If it is supposed to be shared between developers to developers, programmers to programmers, then why do you publicize it to everyone? :stress:
Autistic Aspiring programmers might going to have a field day over it.
 
You now that story about how during the space race the US space program spent a million dollars to develop a pen you could use in space, while the Soviets just used pencils? This is what I feel Apple has done in trying to manage their in-house configuration files.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Wright
DumbDude43 said:
"value?.member

The above expression evaluates to value.member if value is non-null, and to null otherwise."

reading this makes me feel retarded. why does this exist? the behavior they describe is just the default that i would expect from regular value.member expression, what purpose does this special ?. syntax serve?

nevermind i am tired and retarded. i thought it checks if member is null, not if value is null.
basically this shit is syntactic sugar for
Code: 
if (value != null) {
  return value.member
}
else return null;
makes more sense now, but i still dislike it
Click to expand...
I dislike it too, it feels strange having the ? before the end of the var name, just seems clunky to me
 
A Logging Company said:
You now that story about how during the space race the US space program spent a million dollars to develop a pen you could use in space, while the Soviets just used pencils? This is what I feel Apple has done in trying to manage their in-house configuration files.
Click to expand...
fun fact about that, the graphite shavings from the pencils clogged the fuck out of the air filtration system
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Wright, A Logging Company and cia-log
great now make a programming language that won't compile unless you thoroughly document the expected behavior of every single function using comments

or a programming language that won't compile unless you pass a 45 minute exam proving you speak English fluently

or a programming language that detects if you're trying to pad your pad your resume with "contributions" to open source projects like typo fixes and wipes your hard drive
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back