Apple says it will kick Parler off the App Store in 24 hours unless content is moderated

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
No because that's retarded. Look up what protected classes are in the law.


Do you ever tire of simping for a 75 year old grifter?


Look up protected classes. You can't not hire someone simply because they're a tranny, but you can for any non-protected class
Click to expand...
Protected classes are state sanctioned discrimination because the government views some races, sexes, or groups as better than another. Do you support Yaniv because the state does?
Marvin said:
Race is a protected class. Not black people. Sex is a protected class. Not women.
Click to expand...
Wrong in practice and in legal theory.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Chris Mclean, soy_king and Meat Target
PaleTay said:
Protected classes are state sanctioned discrimination because the government views some races, sexes, or groups as better than another. Do you support Yaniv because the state does?
Click to expand...
What? Protected classes aren't specific instances of those classes, but the classes itself. You cannot refuse to hire someone just because they're straight, gay, bi, tranny, etc...
 
Twitter is retarded.
Parler is retarded.
Gab is retarded.
Goolge is retarded.
Apple is retarded.
Amazon is retarded.

None of these organisations strike me as particularly trustworthy. Anyone who stands to gain monetarily form exploiting you is not your friend and you should not form emotional attachments to them nor trust them.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: soy_king, Judge Dredd, The Littlest Shitlord and 11 others
The theory:
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
What? Protected classes aren't specific instances of those classes, but the classes itself. You cannot refuse to hire someone just because they're straight, gay, bi, tranny, etc...
Click to expand...
The reality:
MoreEqual.png
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Chris Mclean, The Littlest Shitlord, furūtsu and 7 others
PaleTay said:
Wrong based on legal definitions, precedent, and theory around of protected classes, disparate impact and treatment, and subject classifications,
Click to expand...
Nope. They can decide not to hire you for any reason that isn't a protected class (age, gender, sexual preference, etc) except in a few cases where it would not allow you to do the job. You can be fired or not hired for pretty much any other reason.
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Marvin and Headshotmaster138
Marvin said:
Lawsuits about employment discrimination against men regularly succeed. They're rarer, but not at all fruitless.

The EEOC does pursue those cases pretty effectively.
Click to expand...
"Men sometimes aren't treated like second-class citizens" isn't what I'd call a huge win. (Hard mode: now do white people.)
 
Here’s a new idea for a Signal/Parler/Telegram styled app:

>distributed through secondhand sources (like direct APK downloads for Android or even ones for iOS)
>VPS servers are hosted in Transnistria
>don’t use soy DBs or cloudshit
>use P2P for infrastructure
>don’t use mainstream payment processors, stick to Bitcoin + Monero. Don’t use Coinbase.

Am I getting anything wrong or missing anything?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drag-on Knight 91873
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back