- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
This would be a waste of eugenics @StraightShooter2
Are atheists sub-human?
- Thread starter StraightShooter2
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
Every insufferable atheist I've ever met always tended to be smug and smarmy know it all assholes who had "elite hobbies", like being autistic in "trying to make fantasy be deconstructed with realism", were "experts" in "pop culture geek humor", were huge fanwhores of That Guy With The Glasses, or were powerhungry administrators and mods of places like Wikia and TV Tropes. I'm sure your experiences are fairly recent, but the majority of atheists don't even like anime "unironically" or at all for "not being realistic" because their science-faith dictates that they must be "rational and logical" to garner asspats from other likeminded losers. So I'm not exactly sure where you're getting your facts from.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
any time you hear someone say they "deconstruct" things ask them if they'd like their jaw deconstructed
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
Cleansing the gene pool based on cultural choices people makes is one of the dumbest things I've heard.
First, you might note that cleansing the gene pool is a bit of a taboo subject and if you're going to broach it, you might want to brush up on your diplomatic skills on how to do so productively, if that is even possible.
Second, it's taboo for good reason, as it is all too easy for anyone to be outside of the group allowed to procreate, which means we are tlaking about genocide.
Now assuming you have managed to set the stage for a productive discussion about genocide, impossible as that seems to me, then your next step is to use cultural identifiers to select for genes?
I think genetics are hugely influential in who we are, how we act, how we think. Complex behaviour and traits such as IQ, extraversion, likelyhood of being an alcoholic, correlates about 0.6. Thag is pretty high, considering all other identified correlation (education, social class, guardians and more) only goes up to 0.1 combined.
If you're going to gene cleanse, why not do it based in genes? Identify which predispose towards religiosity. There have already been studies done in that.
After all, do you take even a second to think about the practicality of your proposal? Okay, atheists may not procreate/will be killed by lawful decree.
Gee where have they all gone? Everyone believes in something now. I bet. I bet they really believe.
StraightShooter2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
That's just some silly little pictorial/representative image and/or Jungian archetype, which has more in common with how an atheist views his waifu / flying spaghetti monster avatar than it does with God in any actual world religions (where God is described as a supreme being or principle of the cosmos, linked to mathematics - not a temporal entity which has any physical appearance.
Those "religious" traits apply more to atheists than they do to religious intellectuals - "religious" in that sense doesn't mean a follower of any specific "world religion", it just has to do with the traits by which people act in regards to whatever religion/secular ideology/fandom they happen to identify with.
(Those traits would be more pronounced in a rabid sports/anime/Sonic/Richard Dawkins/Chris Hitchens/Trump fan than they would in an intellectual such as C.S. Lewis, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, and so on).
---
Definition of religious
(Entry 1 of 2)a: scrupulously and conscientiously faithful
b: FERVENT, ZEALOUS
---
Religious, in this sense would more accurately describe a "zealous atheist/Marxist/secularist/Dawkins/Harris/Insane Clown Posse fan" than it would an intellectual who identifies with a specifically defined "world religion".
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2017
Congratulations on triggering Godwin's law as early as the OP, OP.
No, genocide is not a solution to anything except maybe retard-posting. Atheism is just the absence of belief in something. Yes there's the stereotypical anti-theist fedora neckbeard douchebag, but they've never had any relevance or power even when they were a thing. Atheism can mean anything from aggressive hatred of religious people, to people who subscribe to a fully scientific view of the universe, to those who do have spiritual beliefs that do not involve conventional deities. Saying "all atheists are subhumans who need to die" not only outs you as an edgelord retard, but it also puts you on the MovieBob level of "anyone who thinks differently to me needs to be put in camps" so congratulations on taking the first step to lolcowdom.
No, genocide is not a solution to anything except maybe retard-posting. Atheism is just the absence of belief in something. Yes there's the stereotypical anti-theist fedora neckbeard douchebag, but they've never had any relevance or power even when they were a thing. Atheism can mean anything from aggressive hatred of religious people, to people who subscribe to a fully scientific view of the universe, to those who do have spiritual beliefs that do not involve conventional deities. Saying "all atheists are subhumans who need to die" not only outs you as an edgelord retard, but it also puts you on the MovieBob level of "anyone who thinks differently to me needs to be put in camps" so congratulations on taking the first step to lolcowdom.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
I think the fact that you are comparing "atheists" to "religious intellectuals" should serve as a sufficiently clear mirror how you're not approaching this with any sense of balance.
But I have to admit you're a galaxybrain for saying we ahould ethnically cleanse the atheists, because they're too religious.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
wat
wow 2010s really were a blur.
Seems like just last year or so, the stereotypical atheist was a fedora'd neckbeard Libertarian. And that they either went soy or "traditionalist" shows that the former stereotypical neckbeard really didn't have a sense of identity.
RMQualtrough
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2021
Not sure why there's no laugh react lol.
Self-styled intellectuals are often beta and lame. Except Christopher Hitchens.
Some religions are Atheist though (well, probably Agnostic?). I happen to think they might be accurate. These would be certain sects of Buddhism and Hinduism. I have some belief in the concept of Brahman (not Brahma)... I've personally had a number of mystical experiences, so the idea is not one I dismiss.
Self-styled intellectuals are often beta and lame. Except Christopher Hitchens.
Some religions are Atheist though (well, probably Agnostic?). I happen to think they might be accurate. These would be certain sects of Buddhism and Hinduism. I have some belief in the concept of Brahman (not Brahma)... I've personally had a number of mystical experiences, so the idea is not one I dismiss.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
Eh, I think Buddhism would be nontheistic as opposed to atheistic.
Atheism is explicit belief that there is no god of any kind while nontheistic faiths are open to the concept of the divine but believe that it's irrelevant to the core tenants of the faith.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
OP is subhuman and will now be subjected to cleansing protocols.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
I mean, atheist nutjobs usually act cringy on the internet. While Islamic extremists are usually Jihadists commiting atrocities left, right and centre or trying to implement Sharia Law and Christian extremists who think they have heard God talking to them, right when they are about to commit a crime such as a mass shooting or about to form a cult.
So, no. In comparison to the rest of humanity, they are on the tamer side of things.
So, no. In comparison to the rest of humanity, they are on the tamer side of things.
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
Chess is a measure of IQ, right? And humans tend to have a certain IQ range.
Atheists seem to get checkmated a lot, so I guess by that definition, their IQ might be subhuman.
Atheists seem to get checkmated a lot, so I guess by that definition, their IQ might be subhuman.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2019
Large
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020