Are bisexuals real?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
bisexuals are funny because they made men and women angry

men hate that bisexual women still value monogamy and won’t have theesomes with them/bisexual men might be attracted to them and threaten their masculinity

women hate that bisexual women are still competing with them/bisexual men could be attracted to them and giving them resources but are choosing to fuck men instead
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huh what?
Fags are the reason anyone gets aids or syphilis. These diseases would probably have been eradicated without fags, or if they had to be more secretive about their bumfucking and couldn't reach the astronomical number of lifetime partners as they currently do.
I wouldn't give a fuck about fags giving each other AIDS if they kept it among themselves. The problem is gay men who want the benefits of a straight relationship (basically emotional and domestic labour from a woman) and lie to her for years about being a fag while cheating on her with men and giving her AIDS. That's just unbelievably evil and it still happens despite there being no more consequences for fags being openly gay and therefore no reason to drag a woman down with them except they know a man will never be a good partner to them and only a woman will clean up after them and listen to their feelings.
 
Last edited:
Nope! Just a higher risk of domestic violence at the hands of a previous male partner
Lesbianism is a cope, but who cares? At least they don’t spread AIDS
I wouldn't give a fuck about fags giving each other aids if they kept it among themselves. The problem is gay men who want the benefits of a straight relationship (basically emotional and domestic labour for a woman) and lie to her for years about being a fag while cheating on her with men and giving her AIDS. That's just unbelievably evil and it still happens despite there being no more consequences for fags being openly gay and therefore no reason to drag a woman down with them except they know a man will never be a good partner to them and only a woman will clean up after them and listen to their feelings.
credit where it’s due, fags are cancer and should be branded so at least people know what they are
 
they're real in the same sense homosexuals and the entirety of the lgbt etc crew is. It's a false distinction. Americans, for whatever reason. have been led to believe that some people are born attracted to the same sex, others are attracted to the opposite sex, others are attracted to both, and so on. The "classical" homosexuals that are said to be genuinely attracted solely to their own sex are people with serious endocrine issues and comprise a tiny minority, whereas most self-named homosexuals are bisexuals/pansexuals/whatever other term western sociologists come up with. That is to say, they are hypersexual individuals that will fuck anything/anyone that does or doesn't move.​
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lidl Drip
Nope! Just a higher risk of domestic violence at the hands of a previous male partner
No lesbians have the highest rate of reported domestic violence of all relationship types, when homosexual men have the lowest.

Personally I think it's because there's twice the people who could report it without facing the severe social and shameful consequences that men face for publishing themselves as victims.
And also because a male homosexual relationship on average is much shallower than a female one. There is simply so much more at stake.
 
Most are faking but theoretically I'm sure some kind of mental problem of that sort could exist.
I've always said asexuals are just regular people who have been fooled into believing they aren't normal because their life doesn't revolve around having sex. Or autistic people who have been fooled into believing that being autistic is a sexuality.
 
I wouldn't give a fuck about fags giving each other AIDS if they kept it among themselves. The problem is gay men who want the benefits of a straight relationship (basically emotional and domestic labour for a woman) and lie to her for years about being a fag while cheating on her with men and giving her AIDS. That's just unbelievably evil and it still happens despite there being no more consequences for fags being openly gay and therefore no reason to drag a woman down with them except they know a man will never be a good partner to them and only a woman will clean up after them and listen to their feelings.
I had to take a test once because a bisexual man had gotten infected, had sex with a woman, got tested and discovered it, then waited two weeks before informing her, giving her time to have sex with me. If I had actually gotten infected, I would probably have killed him. If she had actually gotten infected I would at least have beaten him up.

Also, aids may spread most commonly through sex, but it can spread inadvertently in other ways (eg a bloody fight, or a doctor trying to help someone with a wound), so the existence of the disease itself is bad, as well its strain on health care. It's also a problem that men generally (not just fags) can't be trusted to control sexuality well enough to not spread a disease. It does matter that fags spread AIDS among each other. It's also a risk for doctors, some of the most valuable people in our society.
 
No lesbians have the highest rate of reported domestic violence of all relationship types, when homosexual men have the lowest.

Personally I think it's because there's twice the people who could report it without facing the severe social and shameful consequences that men face for publishing themselves as victims.
And also because a male homosexual relationship on average is much shallower than a female one. There is simply so much more at stake.
I think it’s a matter of sensitivity. Lesbians are like “did you raise your voice!? Triggered! I’m calling the police!” and fags are like “oooh, kinky”
 
No lesbians have the highest rate of reported domestic violence of all relationship types, when homosexual men have the lowest.

Personally I think it's because there's twice the people who could report it without facing the severe social and shameful consequences that men face for publishing themselves as victims.
And also because a male homosexual relationship on average is much shallower than a female one. There is simply so much more at stake.
This is based on a single study that didn't ask the gender of the person who was committing the domestic violence. Believe it or not there are a lot of women who stop dating men altogether after getting the fuck beaten out of them. Nowhere in the study does it say these women were beaten by other women.
 
I've always said asexuals are just regular people who have been fooled into believing they aren't normal because their life doesn't revolve around having sex. Or autistic people who have been fooled into believing that being autistic is a sexuality.
Or just have low sex drives, but probably still existent. True asexuals would need to have a disorder in the region of their brain relating to sex, or maybe were abused, or have some kind of hormone imbalance.

this thread's just proof why you should write it all off as sexual degeneracy
Agreed.
 
Back