Are niggers and pajeets the next step of human evolution?

Sort by date Sort by votes
No, as I've said in other threads, it's whites and some asians:


dick brain said:
The general consensus in human behavioral biology, at least back when it was allowed to be discussed in an academic setting, is that mankind is in the process of evolving from a tournament species (nonmonogamous, unbalanced ratio of sexes, high intrasexual competition, dominant males breed with multiple partners, males don't take part in raising offspring, high violence) to a pair bonding species (monogamous, balanced ratio of sexes, comparatively low intrasexual competition, both parents raise offspring, low violence). Given that hypothesis, I think it's fairly obvious which countries are the vanguard of this evolution (interestingly signs point to Asia being farther along since one of the hallmarks of tournament species is sexual dimorphism, i.e. visible differences between sexes, and... I mean come on, just look at 'em). I posit that the correlation between tit men and civilized society isn't coincidental, rather it's a symptom of this evolutionary shift from literal monkeys to a species that raises our fucking kids.
Click to expand...
dick brain said:
Asians, a hundred percent. They have little sexual dimorphism because they have little sexual expression (small breasts, small penis, little body hair, little difference in height/frame/musculature). There's a reason thai trannies are the only ones that pass and it's not just plastic surgery and makeup, they're all a blank canvas from the start because they barely develop male features. Asians are like scaled up children -- which probably has something to do with their propensity for pedophilia, and the overlap if weeaboos and pedophiles.

This has interesting implications because sexual dimorphism is a hallmark of tournament species, whereas the absence of it is the hallmark of a pair bonding species. Tournament species have an unbalanced ratio of sexes, have high intrasexual competition and thus high incidence of violence, are nonmonogamous as dominant males breed with multiple partners, males don't take part in raising offspring -- basically, niggers. Pair bonding species are the opposite, with low intrasexual competition, low rates of violence, monogamy, and coparenting. The running hypothesis in human behavioral biology is that humans are in the process of evolving from a tournament species to a pair bonding species; which, if true, would mean the bugman is unfortunately the next step in human evolution, and the nips and gooks are on the bleeding edge, and we should be paying attention and taking note of the pitfalls that are destroying their birthrate and causing their extinction.
Click to expand...

Thank you for coming to my SPED Talk.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Spiny Rumples, Ughubughughughughughghlug, Gangstalker #32194 and 2 others
Upvote 0 Downvote
They are favored under the current conditions on this planet which demand cheap labor. The easiest way to get this labor is to import it instead of favor one's own population, so for lowest-skilled labor, import negroes and for labor requiring slightly higher levels of thought like truck driving or programming, import jeets. The actual quality of this labor of course doesn't matter, nor do side effects like importing large negro extended families of which the majority are on welfare while one or two of them actually work.
dick brain said:
No, as I've said in other threads, it's whites and some asians:
Click to expand...
Evolution has no end goal beside propagation of the species. If having a complex civilization makes you not propagate the species because you have feminism and endless porn, then evolution favors the parts of the species which have neither i.e. Africans and Middle Easterners.

Although that's more of a sociocultural and not a biological problem, even if Darwinian principles are valid for each. Feminism and endless porn wasn't a problem in white or Asian societies until the late 1960s.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Moths and AnsemSoD1
Upvote 0 Downvote
Save the Loli said:
They are favored under the current conditions on this planet which demand cheap labor. The easiest way to get this labor is to import it instead of favor one's own population, so for lowest-skilled labor, import negroes and for labor requiring slightly higher levels of thought like truck driving or programming, import jeets. The actual quality of this labor of course doesn't matter, nor do side effects like importing large negro extended families of which the majority are on welfare while one or two of them actually work.

Evolution has no end goal beside propagation of the species. If having a complex civilization makes you not propagate the species because you have feminism and endless porn, then evolution favors the parts of the species which have neither i.e. Africans and Middle Easterners.

Although that's more of a sociocultural and not a biological problem, even if Darwinian principles are valid for each. Feminism and endless porn wasn't a problem in white or Asian societies until the late 1960s.
Click to expand...
And a successful parasite doesn't eradicate the host population it depends upon for survival.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: AnsemSoD1
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back