Are the genderwar threads hurting the the website and encouraging infighting?

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Yes. But in this case, the IOLTA account is receiving donations (gifts) from third parties for the purpose of paying legal expenses. If Null said gib me dats, Hardin has to say yes, but Null also would have to be careful crossing all the t's and dotting all the i's after receipt from Hardin, or he could get in some shit. Which he isn't going to do to himself lol

I was not in the least suggesting any sort of actual or planned impropriety, merely speaking to nature of the things.

And no, Hardin doesn't have to "say yes," in the sense of agreement; an attorney must return unearned funds when requested. The attorney has no say in what the client does with their own money - unless there's some other kind of arrangement or trust involved, of course (but if a trust owns the funds and requests returns of funds in the CTA, that money goes to the trust regardless of who has what role in it). But if Josh decided to engage a different lawyer, in the absence of some other unknown arrangement, he could certainly tell any attorney with his money in a CTA that he wants anything unearned returned to him and then place it with another lawyer...or do whatever.

That said, what you're talking about is at most a private action by donors vs a donee who did not use donated funds as originally expressed - a civil claim, and not likely a good one. Otherwise, afaik, there's no 501c3 or other tax-advantaged organization involved, and as mentioned, small gifts from donors wouldn't typically trigger a tax impact to a recipient (individual, corporation, or an llc/ its sole member, as the case may be). Again, broadly speaking.

Nick's 5k donors who have not received their Mystery Gift would have a much better claim. Not that I'm saying they have a likely or worthwhile one, but better.

 

[Meth Until Death]

They should just fuck each other already.

Let a thousand blossoms bloom!

 

[RichardMongler]

You're the worst poster on this site and your posts are only liked by effeminate faggots and other braindead, lip-smacking niggers. Everything you post is "moid" this and "men" mad. Like anyone gives a fuck that you're a 'woman'.

You roll into every thread that you perceive to be a slight on women, just to start unnecessary arguments and drop the same old tired schtick. You're to gender threads what HHH is to Trump threads, except you lack the humour, introspection and class to pull off HHH-level trolls.

Oops, I guess I'm a big mad virgin, softcock meanie for pointing out that you're a fucking mong. You actively make this site worse and have nothing to contribute.

Neck yourself you boring fat fuck.

Remember the time Logan got really bootyblasted that Dear Feeder had a thing for Emily Youcis? I do:

So much for being a based tradwife who stopped being an attention whore on the Internet and logged off to raise kids or whatever.

View attachment 5989203
View attachment 5989204

Well now she's back on Twitter sucking sandnigger cock 24/7

View attachment 5989830
View attachment 5989834
View attachment 5989835
View attachment 5989836
View attachment 5989837
View attachment 5989838


And begging Turkey Tom to interview her
View attachment 5989859
View attachment 5989864
View attachment 5989863

Having a tough time there, buddy?

View attachment 6016154

projecting faggot

I just clicked on his profile to see whose sock account he is and that was posted yesterday my dude.

Keep coping and seething doods, she's just a mentally ill cloutchaser.

 

[draggs]

I was not in the least suggesting any sort of actual or planned impropriety, merely speaking to nature of the things.

And no, Hardin doesn't have to "say yes," in the sense of agreement; an attorney must return unearned funds when requested. The attorney has no say in what the client does with their own money - unless there's some other kind of arrangement or trust involved, of course (but if a trust owns the funds and requests returns of funds in the CTA, that money goes to the trust regardless of who has what role in it). But if Josh decided to engage a different lawyer, in the absence of some other unknown arrangement, he could certainly tell any attorney with his money in a CTA that he wants anything unearned returned to him and then place it with another lawyer...or do whatever.

That said, what you're talking about is at most a private action by donors vs a donee who did not use donated funds as originally expressed - a civil claim, and not likely a good one. Otherwise, afaik, there's no 501c3 or other tax-advantaged organization involved, and as mentioned, small gifts from donors wouldn't typically trigger a tax impact to a recipient (individual, corporation, or an llc/ its sole member, as the case may be). Again, broadly speaking.

Nick's 5k donors who have not received their Mystery Gift would have a much better claim. Not that I'm saying they have a likely or worthwhile one, but better.

Neither was I lol

You're just being pedantic now to find a disagreement that isn't there

 

[zyclonPD]

Lmao you really think you're owed a thread you don't like being closed just because you gave 1 grand?

I'm not owed anything and have never asked for a thread to be closed. I've merely asked that a containment thread actually be contained and stop appearing in the threads I read for no reason. I'm simply done funding him. That's it. Nothing more nothing less. Not buying any more merch, not donating anymore, not sending crypto. I've been donating here and there since New Project 2 existed and Null was on it. I'm just simply done. I'm free to not give money to something I no longer believe in and I can announce that on a forum.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

"The website makes no money"
>collects $75,000 in donations for a litigation fund through the website
"No you're just too retarded to understand"

Okay?

I'd say it actually makes sense.
Profit = income - costs of operation.
Legal fund was for costs of operation.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Neither was I lol

You're just being pedantic now to find a disagreement that isn't there

Lol, yourself, friendo. I wasn't disagreeing about minutiae, just trying to be precise (or as precise as I can be with all the caveats). I'm sure you know how side comments can take on a life of their own, and this is not an area I would want to be reckless with.

And to be clear I wasn't suggesting you were suggesting anything incorrect was in play, just interested in clarifying that I wasn't.

(There are some things I don't play with, and this is one.)

 

[Hubelublub]

Hey ladies, you know that awful situation where some moid takes a liking to you, and suddenly he's buying you random shit, doing unasked favours for you, and just being exceedingly generous for no reason, and when you try to say he doesn't have to do this shit, he says it's no problem, he doesn't mind, and you're a great person so you deserve it. You can do no wrong in his eyes, and he's eager to sacrifice for you.
And then suddenly one day he decides you've wronged him for some totally inconsequential thing, he's absofuckinglutely furious with you, and now all those altruistic favours he did and all the kindness he extended, he suddenly calls in and expects you to return to him what he is owed.
He's done SO MUCH for you, why can't you do this ONE thing for him?
And when you don't lie down and ballwash him, now you're in the wrong, and he will loudly and proudly tell everyone what a horrible shit you are.
You know that situation?

Well, now Null does too.

 

[Lurker]

Hey ladies, you know that awful situation where some moid takes a liking to you, and suddenly he's buying you random shit, doing unasked favours for you, and just being exceedingly generous for no reason, and when you try to say he doesn't have to do this shit, he says it's no problem, he doesn't mind, and you're a great person so you deserve it. You can do no wrong in his eyes, and he's eager to sacrifice for you.
And then suddenly one day he decides you've wronged him for some totally inconsequential thing, he's absofuckinglutely furious with you, and now all those altruistic favours he did and all the kindness he extended, he suddenly calls in and expects you to return to him what he is owed.
He's done SO MUCH for you, why can't you do this ONE thing for him?
And when you don't lie down and ballwash him, now you're in the wrong, and he will loudly and proudly tell everyone what a horrible shit you are.
You know that situation?

Well, now Null does too.

BUT I HAVE 6 KIWI COINS AND I BOUGHT ALL THE MERCH, NULL WHY MUST YOU FORSAKE ME BY ALLOWING WOMEN TO EXIST ON THIS SITE?

 

[Colloid]

I've been donating here and there since New Project 2 existed and Null was on it.

Don't care. Didn't ask. The world doesn't revolve around you.

 

[crazedaze]

Great show, you guys, the toddler tanty never gets old. Again we've had a couple more "lidl ruins everything" posts in tye last few hours, no mention of all the men in various threads just casually throwing in misogyny and derailing threads and making everything about how much they hate women. Niggers raping: ahhhh women voted for it lololol
Extremely infantile behavior, you are incredibly amusing. Lidl is amazing.

 

[Lidl Drip]

If only there was a way to put users you don't like on ignore so you don't have to see their posts... oh well I guess nothing can be done. If a user annoys you then you have to demand they be banned or quit the entire site and have a big meltdown.

 

[The best and greatest]

"Is Kiwi Farms over because femoids are allowed to talk back to us and we get called out for being retarded rape apes now?" lol cry about it

Evolving past might-makes-right was a mistake

 

[Lurker]

If only there was a way to put users you don't like on ignore so you don't have to see their posts... oh well I guess nothing can be done. If a user annoys you then you have to demand they be banned or quit the entire site and have a big meltdown.

b-but lidl i bought the merch, therefore null has to cater to me

 

[RichardMongler]

put users you don't like on ignore so you don't have to see their posts

Blocking on KiwiFarms is for faggots.​

 

[Lidl Drip]

Blocking on KiwiFarms is for faggots.​

Right, a real heterosexual Chad instead seethes impotently every time they see a user they don't like post and has a big cry about it. There's like maybe 5 women on here who take feminist pro-woman stances regularly. It would be a very short ignore list and solve all your problems. Meanwhile I have like 300 people on mine and still get tagged 5 times a day by some nigga threatening to rape me or telling me to kms cause you all can't just put ME on your ignore list and have to act like shit flinging apes instead. Maybe if you have such little control over your emotions you're just not fit to participate in a community where different oppinions from yours are allowed to exist.

 

[RichardMongler]

Meanwhile I have like 300 people on mine and still get tagged 5 times a day by some nigga threatening to rape me or telling me to kms cause you all can't just put ME on your ignore list and have to act like shit flinging apes instead.

really? No one has credibly issued me a death/rape threat, but if they did, I have a wonderful bit of pasta.

Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?
4210 Wolfetown Rd, Cherokee, NC 28719
Bring as many of your cowardly friends as you want; I'll go to prison, but all of you will go to the morgue.

 

[draggs]

Right, a real heterosexual Chad instead seethes impotently every time they see a user they don't like post and has a big cry about it. There's like maybe 5 women on here who take feminist pro-woman stances regularly. It would be a very short ignore list and solve all your problems. Meanwhile I have like 300 people on mine and still get tagged 5 times a day by some nigga threatening to rape me or telling me to kms cause you all can't just put ME on your ignore list and have to act like shit flinging apes instead. Maybe if you have such little control over your emotions you're just not fit to participate in a community where different oppinions from yours are allowed to exist.

Meanwhile I have like 300 people on mine

Meanwhile I have like 300 people on mine

Meanwhile I have like 300 people on mine

Plus the rest of this wonderful Lidl screed that never gets old despite being the same every time

Anyone who says Lidl is bad fite me. Lidl is the gift that keeps on giving

But Lidl, you should feel proud that some large number of autists are regularly telling you to kys. That only means you're a true and honest successful antipodean birb farmer

 

[Epic Fail Man]

Hey ladies, you know that awful situation where some moid takes a liking to you, and suddenly he's buying you random shit, doing unasked favours for you, and just being exceedingly generous for no reason, and when you try to say he doesn't have to do this shit, he says it's no problem, he doesn't mind, and you're a great person so you deserve it. You can do no wrong in his eyes, and he's eager to sacrifice for you.
And then suddenly one day he decides you've wronged him for some totally inconsequential thing, he's absofuckinglutely furious with you, and now all those altruistic favours he did and all the kindness he extended, he suddenly calls in and expects you to return to him what he is owed.
He's done SO MUCH for you, why can't you do this ONE thing for him?
And when you don't lie down and ballwash him, now you're in the wrong, and he will loudly and proudly tell everyone what a horrible shit you are.
You know that situation?

That's because men's main goal is to fuck, it's in our instincts . That's why men and women can't really have platonic friendships. The quicker you understand this the simpler your life will be.

It's also why toxic masculinity teachings in college is confusing women, since testosterone induced men tend to be straight forward and honest (not the andrew tate fake masculinity type), while the soyboy niceguys will try and manipulate and snake their way to get pussy.

 

[AgendaPoster]

All I see is hundreds of unrepentant community infighters there, and almost no white knights to defend m'lady from all this abominable abuse.