Are you getting the vaccine? - Absolute trashfire thread, please enter with caution

@Badungus Kabungus

As of recently we even had two white supremacist shootups that would've never happened if guns were restricted if not outright banned.

It's kind of hard to hunt without one, whether for sport or to kill varmints that need killing.
The only justified reason to ever own a firearm TBH.
 
@Badungus Kabungus

As of recently we even had two white supremacist shootups that would've never happened if guns were restricted if not outright banned.


The only justified reason to ever own a firearm TBH.
You libtards are unbearably stupid, and I hope you need a gun some day.
 
You libtards are unbearably stupid, and I hope you need a gun some day.
Will never happen because I don't live in your shitty country that elected a dumb retard suffering from dementia. :sighduck:

There's never any gun accident going on where I live and a pocket knife is good enough to defend myself.
 
@Badungus Kabungus

As of recently we even had two white supremacist shootups that would've never happened if guns were restricted if not outright banned.


The only justified reason to ever own a firearm TBH.
Right, as if not having access to a firearm would've fixed his mental issues. He would've just gotten a car and mowed down a dozen people like his Canadian counterpart, or figured out which household chemicals to mix to make poison gas and then gassed an entire subway train like his Japanese counterpart. It's like trying to fight diarrhea by restricting access to toilets, the person is just going to shit themselves in the lobby instead.

Or he would've bought a gun illegally from some hoodrats and shot some other hoodrats. Oh wait, no one cares when that happens, can't use that for political points.
 
Will never happen because I don't live in your shitty country that elected a dumb retard suffering from dementia. :sighduck:
"Elected" lol

There's never any gun accident going on where I live and a pocket knife is good enough to defend myself.
Accident? No, I'm talking about a terrible incident, or do bad things not happen in your flawless country but by mistake? And enjoy your knife fight, sounds way better than just doing this:

 
Right, as if not having access to a firearm would've fixed his mental issues. He would've just gotten a car and mowed down a dozen people like his Canadian counterpart, or figured out which household chemicals to mix to make poison gas and then gassed an entire subway train like his Japanese counterpart. It's like trying to fight diarrhea by restricting access to toilets, the person is just going to shit themselves in the lobby instead.
That's not the point, it requires some expertise to create poison and driving cars is restricted to permits.

Also the specific terrorist attack in the supermarket couldn't have happened with a car, you can't ram a car into a building and expect it to keep it running all the way through. Hell even Charlottesville had 1 kill compared to the Buffalo shit which has 11 despite more people being at that protest. So even if the dude tried to use a different method to kill people that would have either been unsuccessful or less deadly than with his firearm. Literally military grade weapons are allowed in the USA.
 
I know this was to Badungus but I'm autistically compelled to give my 2 cents:

While I agree that guns are very dangerous and that we'd be safer if no one had them, the reason the 2nd Amendment exists is because it's too dangerous for the people if only the Police and Military have guns. White supremacist cops hiding behind qualified immunity aren't magically less dangerous than the last racist spree killer. Also, consider how China currently treats their disarmed citizens with brazen contempt.

I'm all for universal gun control and will happily turn my guns in after all the governments of the world demilitarize. The issue with the modern idea of "gun control" is that only certain people are required to disarm.
 
That's not the point, it requires some expertise to create poison and driving cars is restricted to permits.

Also the specific terrorist attack in the supermarket couldn't have happened with a car, you can't ram a car into a building and expect it to keep it running all the way through. Hell even Charlottesville had 1 kill compared to the Buffalo shit which has 11 despite more people being at that protest. So even if the dude tried to use a different method to kill people that would have either been unsuccessful or less deadly than with his firearm. Literally military grade weapons are allowed in the USA.

11 people dead.
 
First paragraph literally reads this:
The incident is the deadliest vehicle-ramming attack in Canadian history.
It doesn't even compare to the deadliest mass shooting:
148 murdered in some Kenyan university.

In the US the deadliest mass shooting killed 56 and was in Las Vegas.

I'm all for universal gun control and will happily turn my guns in after all the governments of the world demilitarize. The issue with the modern idea of "gun control" is that only certain people are required to disarm.
It's never going to happen, we were fucked the moment guns were first created, but honestly even if a cop can misuse his firearm (which happens often in the US) I think that giving the common man military grade guns like semi-automatics is a total joke that runs rampant in this country.
 
First paragraph literally reads this:

It doesn't even compare to the deadliest mass shooting:
148 murdered in some Kenyan university.

In the US the deadliest mass shooting killed 56 and was in Las Vegas.


It's never going to happen, we were fucked the moment guns were first created, but honestly even if a cop can misuse his firearm (which happens often in the US) I think that giving the common man military grade guns like semi-automatics is a total joke that runs rampant in this country.
Holy shit you must be trolling now. Military grade just means it was made by the lowest bidder. Semi automatic guns are absolutely commonplace and are not going anywhere. My "non military" deer rifle is a lot more accurate and packs a heavier punch than "military grade" weapons. Oh and it's semi automatic too.
 
I think that giving the common man military grade guns like semi-automatics is a total joke
This is a total joke, but not why you'd think. What constitutes military grade in your mind? What's wrong with semi-autos? Do you think the only guns civilians should have is single shot muskets or some shit? Bolt actions? If you want to ban semi-autos you might as well just ban all guns, I don't know what you think you can accomplish with single shot guns.
 
Holy shit you must be trolling now. Military grade just means it was made by the lowest bidder. Semi automatic guns are absolutely commonplace and are not going anywhere. My "non military" deer rifle is a lot more accurate and packs a heavier punch than "military grade" weapons. Oh and it's semi automatic too.
Did they give you that weapon like candy? You need to pass multiple tests and must be mentally sound to be carrying a hunting rifle in Europe.

Hell there was an initiative that passed as recently as 2021 to prevent gun abuse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_(EU)_2021/555

I don't know what you think you can accomplish with single shot guns.
There won't be anymore mass shootings simple as that and single shot or not, those guns can still be used in hunting.
 
:story:

I do agree that mass shootings will go way down

Once we get done mass shooting those who think they can take away our guns

In clowncraft
Why do you mutts always believe that somehow your government wants to genocide all of you.

No wonders you bought into Qanon's cult, you're all so paranoid. :story:
 
There won't be anymore mass shootings simple as that and single shot or not
It's never going to happen though. It's too easy to get gun's into America. Any gun ban is effectively unenforceable. that's not even factoring in the ones already here.

those guns can still be used in hunting.
And nothing else. You'd be banning any decent form of self defense for the sake of maybe knocking down mass shootings, an already exceedingly rare thing if you don't count gangs killing each other, a nominal amount. You'd probably end up with more people dead who were unable to protect themselves without a gun than lives you'd save from mass shootings.
 
Why do you mutts always believe that somehow your government wants to genocide all of you.

No wonders you bought into Qanon's cult, you're all so paranoid. :story:
What

I think you're confused

I didn't say anything about the government lining people up against the wall

I said that attempting to remove hundreds of millions of guns from tens of millions of people will result in people lining those who tried to take their guns up against the wall

There is no scenario where attempted mass gun confiscation does not result in mass gun violence and guns not being confiscated. There aren't enough people willing to use guns to take other people's guns away, and more than enough people willing to use guns to keep their guns. The idea of removing guns from private ownership en masse in Murica is so unrealistically stupid that only actual retards propose it unironically
 
Back