Are you getting the vaccine? - Absolute trashfire thread, please enter with caution

I know, the 100+ articles I've cited simply don't exist. I should probably do exactly what you say daddy.

Or was it my formatting that got my grade reduced professor? Should I repost them all with MLA formatting?
:story:
Too ashamed to even say a number. What a pussy :story:
lol figure it out, I gave you the relevant information.
 
Well I assumed that you would learn I had posted studies and review my post history.

Apparently I am still correct that you cannot read.
lol you wish I'd look at your post history, but sorry, I'm not interested.

sounds like someone isn't taking rejection well. :tomgirl:

So anyway, to stay on topic, still alive and vaccinated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Product Placement
Strawman -> Appeal to authority -> "child" -> "cope" -> Repeat

Notice, dear reader, how these niggers never cite anything ever.
lol we've (pro-vax people) posted various valid sources in this thread, and no matter what you antivax tards have a problem with the source because it doesn't confirm your antivax idiocy

read the whole thread, faggot
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Product Placement
lol we've (pro-vax people) posted various valid sources in this thread, and no matter what you antivax tards have a problem with the source because it doesn't confirm your antivax idiocy

read the whole thread, faggot
Because you are a gay nigger, I will now post some of my sources that I have cited.

Of course you won't even read the urls, because you don't believe in science, you believe in Fauci's dick.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2306683
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2306683
www.jewishledger.com/2020/11/the-jewish-connection-to-the-covid-vaccines/
https://news.yale.edu/2023/05/05/yale-study-reveals-insights-post-vaccine-heart-inflammation-cases
https://www.beckershospitalreview.c...be-linked-to-covid-19-vaccine-yale-study.html
https://news.yahoo.com/small-study-finds-possible-clues-200221754.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.adh3455

"But waaa Defending the Republic isn't a valid source!!!!" the study was done exclusively by Moderna themselves. I'm writing this preemptively in case you even bother to read the url.

Yes I know I'm dumb, apparently that's what research results in.
 
Last edited:
"But waaa Defending the Republic isn't a valid source!!!!" the study was done exclusively by Moderna themselves. I'm writing this preemptively in case you even bother to read the url.
lol if you need to preempt your garbage with "b-b-but it's totes a valid source because...", you're not even confident in your own bullshit. also, when presenting sources, usually one is expected to at least give pertinent quotes or a summary of said sources, as both a favor to the reader, but also a demonstration of your understanding of the material.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Product Placement
lol if you need to preempt your garbage with "b-b-but it's totes a valid source because...", you're not even confident in your own bullshit. also, when presenting sources, usually one is expected to at least give pertinent quotes or a summary of said sources, as both a favor to the reader, but also a demonstration of your understanding of the material.
I know, when Moderna does a study they shouldn't be trusted. I wouldn't trust them either.

You continue to produce evidence that you can't read. I guess you should read the thread.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Product Placement
I know, when Moderna does a study they shouldn't be trusted. I wouldn't trust them either.

You continue to produce evidence that you can't read. I guess you should read the thread.
it's easy to post a bunch of links as a means to overload the reader with bullshit.

it's hard to have to summarize and justify why these sources are valid.

:story:
 
Back