Are you team Shiny Linux or team Stable Linux

Which team?

  • Shiny Linux

    Votes: 9 16.1%
  • Stable Linux

    Votes: 35 62.5%
  • Neither but I'll physically suffer if I don't share my opinion wherever it's not wanted

    Votes: 12 21.4%

  • Total voters
    56
Give me stable, every day, and I swear if I have to open some stupid widget to configure your app instead of having a centralized config file I can call from terminal I am uninstalling your shit.
If I can't run your shit from vim if I have to then it's not Linux.
 
Somewhere in the middle, but erring on the side of stable. I use TuxedoOS as my daily driver, which has the option for both X11 and Wayland (I'm sticking with X11) and Sparky Linux (basically Debian Stable) on the Raspberry Pi that I use as a learning tool. I know from using Arch ~10 years ago that running "pacman -Syu" can lead to some learning experiences, but I don't have time for that these days and I'm trying to learn how to manage websites on an nginx server during downtime, not how to fix the windowing system when I have other work to do.
 
Shiny for desktop and stable for servers. It's the best of both worlds because I can experiment and fuck around as much as I want with my client environment and there's no real risk of it damaging important data. It's all safe on the stable server just in case. I have minimal issues even on a less stable setup, but the added insurance is nice, and it's an approach that is very flexible for many use cases.
 
Back