Argue with a furry over whether the furries are the only future for art

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Artists who can't draw well enough to get a job become furry artists and live off welfare. Haven't seen one that can survive itself.
AI is already wiping everyone and "fagdom" found out artists aren't even needed for art. Good riddance and it's always been just around sex and child abuse.
 
So I read your argument, allow me to deliver my rebuttal:



Bonus:
Is that why there is at least one furry outed for pedophilia or zoo every 2 weeks? Retard, even the dead owner of Furaffinity was one (and helped furry nonces and zoos)

You, of all fucking people, need to shut the fuck up about this. There is no difference between five weeks and ten years for pedo shit.
 
Furry characters are slowly becoming mainstream, people eventually will break this wall anyway, because people hate boredom, artists hate boredom, our brains need new things and toys, yes, furry is going to be huge within next 10 years
Furries, if you define anthropomorphic animals as furries, were always mainstream. In cartoons for little baby children. It's not going to change.
Exceptions such as Fritz the Cat, Felidae, Animal Farm or Watership Down show that it is possible to use this convention to tell a story meant for adults but none of those books \ movies changed the paradigm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
Furry characters are slowly becoming mainstream, people eventually will break this wall anyway, because people hate boredom, artists hate boredom, our brains need new things and toys, yes, furry is going to be huge within next 10 years
Attention Bajoran workers. If there's a group of people that absolutely deserve to be turned into jewish-corporate slop it's the furries. Enjoy ore processing. That's all.
 
To be honest, I believe in the creativity and quality that comes with the good concepts and ideas. Furry characters gave us pokemon/digimon and beastars and minks, or lucci or kaidou in one piece, they gave us kurama in naruto and so on. I think we can make something awesome if we off the leash our creativity and let it rampage. Furries gives us way more than just anthro a tiger or a wolf. You can shit on me all the day long, but I think that we ignore the potential that comes with the new designs and this is truly fucking stupid and retarded. People seem to hate on furry characters just because of the furry community
 
cursed as fuck kek, but this is why creative approach is better than being limited
Zrzut ekranu 2025-05-1 o 01.52.05.webp
 
Look dead serious in my eyes and tell me furries are not future of the industry, this is only matter of time and right investments and ideas, basically screw 'furryservice' and do great things instead
View attachment 7287804
Imagine paying, nay, INVESTING for this shit. How retarded do you have to be to look at this and think: >oh yes very good this is certainly going to define the standards in general art for the next decade or so like fucking kill yourself nigger
 
Yes, this kindergartner has some potential, he should continue drawing but why are you showing this to us?
Well
edit; Imagine being so creatively bankrupt that you shit on someone who see more and tries to make something better than another retarded uwu femboy or stupid cum baits or isekai shit ect. this is why modern stories suck ass, because nobody is trying anymore
GnGljCJWIAAIyrc1.webp
 

Attachments

  • GnGljCJWIAAIyrc1.webp
    GnGljCJWIAAIyrc1.webp
    4 MB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Well
edit; Imagine being so creatively bankrupt that you shit on someone who see more and tries to make something better than another retarded uwu femboy or stupid cum baits or isekai shit ect. this is why modern stories suck ass, because nobody is trying anymore
View attachment 7303166
Why does the one on the top right shit pineapples, what's the lore on the pineapple pooper
 
Furry characters gave us pokemon
I guess furries may have created some modern Pokémon (Incineroar lol), but furry characters definitely did not give us Pokémon. The series comes from Satoshi Tajiri's experiences with collecting bugs (not furry). A majority of the first 151 Pokémon (the Kanto ones) are definitely inspired by monsters and animals, not anthros (which is what I would consider a "furry" character). Even with modern Pokémon, you can tell the majority are inspired by animals or a concept of some kind, rather than some anthro. It would be easier to argue the opposite (Pokémon gave us furry characters) considering how some furries get their start. I can't speak for the other series you listed, but your inclusion of Pokémon as things "furry characters gave us" makes me not believe you (even more).
 
Well
edit; Imagine being so creatively bankrupt that you shit on someone who see more and tries to make something better than another retarded uwu femboy or stupid cum baits or isekai shit ect. this is why modern stories suck ass, because nobody is trying anymore
GnGljCJWIAAIyrc1.webp
If you are going to try and claim your shitty "artwork" is the future at least learn how to color and shade properly.
 
edit; Imagine being so creatively bankrupt that you shit on someone who see more and tries to make something better than another retarded uwu femboy or stupid cum baits or isekai shit ect. this is why modern stories suck ass, because nobody is trying anymore
I don't consume any erotic or pornographic content (and that's the only thing you listed). I consider it all to be retarded shit.
 
Back