This is going to be my last response in the thread because at this point I'm convinced you're American larping as a yuro on your sock, you cannot possibly fundamentally misunderstand the EU legislative process this much and just make shit up. It isn't a debate if you just lie. Keep barking at the moon, nigger.
It's not "a slight imbalance". The Commission is the only one that has the power to draft law. It also can veto any amendment of the other institutions. While in theory the EU Parliament can amend laws, in practice what fucking happens is that, if the Commission doesn't like an amendment, it kills the law, then re-submit it a few months later. And eventually the law gets passed. That's how they passed the Copyright directive despite the fact that it was an anti-free speech legislation, that's how they passed the Green Deal Act that imposed net zero targets on all national governments. And that's always how it works. And in practice nigger, there is fund attribution mechanisms in these laws, so the Commission is still going to do the same thing and say, "well, it's too bad you can't vote on this law, because that's where we included the funds to support your creative industry, whoops" - that's a nigger cattle thing to think the system doesn't work entirely in favor of the Commission and yes the Commissioner are literally unelected vampires and you're literally a zombie.
No, there is literally no actual case where they just keep resubmitting shit randomly until it passes through the same terms. There is no actual evidence this ever happened. It isn't how they passed the Copyright directive or the Green Deal, both were passed through full parliamentary and Council approval.
I can't even say anything about your fund attribution mechanism bit, it's an achievement but that line is probably the most retarded thing you've wrote in your last 2 messages to me- there is nothing about it that reflects reality or even makes sense.
Yes it's funny that every time they asked the people to vote directly it failed. So yes it was the Netherlands and France in 2005 that voted no by referendum (which is people directly voting yes or no on an issue), not Ireland.
Ireland was asked by referendum in 2008 and they voted no, so they tweaked the proposal a little and re-submitted it for vote. Imagine losing a referendum and going "oh you voted no. ok let me tweak what I said last time, in a way that changes nothing at all and make the whole country vote again... it's ok guys, we'll just keep doing this and you'll keep delaying the entire process"
Again complete nigger cattle mentality
How do you not get it you fucking crackhead. When the topic of a referendum (ie an EU treaty) requires unanimous ratification you can't just throw the entire topic out the window because one member state rejects it. You negotiate, make concessions, allow opt-outs, give clarifications, whatever, it's a political negotiation. It's the only way the system can work. Again, if you really are a yuro YOUR parliament voted on it. They ratified it. Maybe get a better parliament? Perhaps move to the Philippines to get your own 11 year old concubine like any proper lolbert, or even better, kill yourself? All valid options.
The modern EU should not have been set up through Parliaments voting to accept the treaty and you can shove your ChatGPT generated list where the sun don't shine. They passed the treaty in national Parliaments through simple majority votes by relying on pro-EU parliamentarians. This treaty took away our national sovereignty and should have been put to the people.
Most of the member states have it in their constitution (Grundgesetz art. 59(2) as an example) that treaty ratification is delegated to parliaments. Referendums are the exception, in Ireland's case they are constitutionally mandated, so they did it, and the referendum PASSED.
What pro-eu parlamentarians, in every single fucking member state? That's how representative democracy works you fucking tweaker, elect better parlaments. None of the 27 EU member states could manage that, and if you are european (which I doubt) it is YOUR fault you didn't get a qualified majority of sensible people into your parliament who truly care about your rights and your country's sovereignty.
Also what chatGPT generated list you illiterate nigger? You're hallucinating again you crackhead?
It cracked nothing at all. No change to the doctrine, no effect on the supremacy and priority of EU law. It only says that in some rare cases, the supreme court of a member state can interpret a EU law if it obviously violates the Supreme Law of that national country and then they all agreed, national courts and and EU court that this would NEVER happen in practice because the EU adopted the Charter of Human Right which solved this issue forever.
I can't talk about jurisprudence nigger. I don't need an AI. You keep babbling. I know how these things work in practice.
lol no.
Why do you keep yapping about AI and accusing every single poster in the thread of being chatgpt? You obviously have no fucking clue how it works, so much so that you didn't even know what the outcome of the particular decision we are talking about even was, saying shit like "Germany folded".
You do not fucking know how any of these things work in practice OR theory. I'd take your own advice, you really need to start using grok or whatever the fuck to fact check it and get your 65 iq takes into the low 80s range by not even bothering to write something down that is so objectively and factually inaccurate.
Both countries have natalist policies which are verbotten
Natalist policies aren't verboten in any of the countries, there is no EU policy that says so. The retarded tax benefits the Hungarian government, the CSOK program, loan forgiveness, increased child benefits which I assume you mean by natalist policies (abortion is legal in Hungary) results in the birth of 0 huwhite people and an explosion in the population of Gypsies, the collapse of the Hungarian housing market and an unprecedented state debt. Very cool!
"actively sabotage the union" you're fucking kidding me right? You know why the EU threatened to withdraw funds to these countries? Because of ANTI LGBT PROPAGANDA because both Poland and Hungary wanted to support the traditional family model!
There is corruption but the fight against corruption is definitely not why the Commission goes after them.
Only an American could downplay and trivialize the amount of corruption in any of these balkan banana republics and pretend everything revolves around the shitty LGTV culture war in every single dark corner of the earth instead of it being a fundamentally American thing that NOONE else fucking cares about, especially not the literal poorest country in the Earth, and pretend that everyone is fighting this massive war against invisible enemies.
There is nothing fundamentally wrong with America, don't get me wrong, yeehaw, lasvegas, burgers, it's all very cool, just don't pretend to be a born and bred European policy expert if you get your Hungaryfacts™ from a Qanon xitteraccount. Illiterate nigger.
Anyway, keep barking if you want, it's going to be my last reply in the thread. It gets tiring to debate and refute shit that you are just making up, you aren't even making it particularly funny, just seething at everything.
