I still cannot understand how posting gore is equally as bad and over the moral event horizon (unforgivable) as posting 'p. If we follow SlavGOD's argument, then we can apply this logic to everything.
The Internet is used by people to talk with each other, make memes, etc. and then there are "people" who post 'p. People shouldn't be using the Internet then.
People have the full right to exercise their freedom of speech in America, but there are "people" who say they want to legalize pedophilia. Better abolish the first amendment then.
I could go on, but you get the point.
Being desensitized to gore isn't the same as being desensitized to 'p. It's still unhealthy, but being desensitized to 'p is downright evil, evil that cannot be forgiven. Would be much easier if we got rid of the behavior that encourages child abuse, like how we are already banning cunnyfags and other 'cord/xitter offsiter trash, we should ban more of them and discourage them from even making jokes about this stuff; as for child gore - it isn't pedophilic, but it still reinforces child abuse, therefore it is better off banned. That's the simplest I can describe it. It's annoying how nusoisluttas don't take differentiations seriously.