War Armed Russian jets have flown over a U.S. base in Syria nearly every day in March, U.S. commander says - Why does the US have a base in Syria?

Lt. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich told NBC News that Russian jets have violated the airspace of At Tanf Garrison roughly 25 times this month, including Wednesday.​



March 22, 2023, 9:17 PM UTC
By Courtney Kube

Armed Russian jets have flown over a U.S. military garrison in Syria nearly every day in March, violating a 4-year-old agreement between the U.S. and Russia and risking escalation, according to the U.S. general in charge of air operations in the region.

Lt. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, combined forces air component commander for U.S. Central Command, told NBC News on Wednesday that the most recent Russian overflight of At Tanf Garrison (ATG) happened just a few hours earlier, and that Russian jets have violated the airspace roughly 25 times so far this month, compared to zero times in February and 14 in January.

“It is a substantial increase,” he said, explaining that at this rate they are “on track to be double what it has been in the past.”
“They’re regularly flying directly overhead of our units, and I’ve defined directly overhead, as within about a mile, no more than a mile offset one side or the other, while we’ve got forces right there on the ground at ATG,” said Grynkewich. “So it’s an uncomfortable situation.”

The Russian aircraft include Su-34 jets. Some aircraft carry air-to-air weapons and others carrying air-to-ground munitions; weapons include radar-guided and heat-seeking missiles and bombs.

This disclosure comes in the wake of an incident over the Black Sea last week in which two Russian Su-27 fighter jets flew aggressively around a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone, dumping fuel on the drone and eventually colliding with it, forcing the U.S. to down the drone in the water.

Grynkewich said he does not think the Russians have any incentive to use weapons against the U.S. military in Syria. “But it just increases the risk of miscalculation, and given things like the MQ-9 incident in the Black Sea, it’s not the kind of behavior that I’d expect out of a professional Air Force.”

The U.S. military has used the established deconfliction phone line it shares with the Russians to protest the actions, but it has not changed Russian behavior. Instead, said Grynkewich, during the calls the Russians have told the U.S. they don’t recognize all the airspace over At Tanf (also known as Al Tanf) as U.S. airspace or that they are responding to coalition activity in the area.

1679583178677.png
The At Tanf Garrison military outpost in Syria in 2018.Lolita Baldor / AP

In 2019 the U.S. and Russia established rules of the air over Syria in order to avoid accidental and potentially provocative encounters. Both sides agreed that direct overflight of each other’s positions on the ground, particularly with armed aircraft, was not acceptable.

“The Russians have over the last several months seemed to abandon that tenet of the protocols,” Grynkewich said. The Russians still insist the U.S. stay away from Russian ground units, he explained, and the U.S. is adhering to that. But the Russians have even flown directly over U.S. troops on the ground in southern Syria, which he called provocative.

Grynkewich said the Russians could be taking a more aggressive posture to put pressure on the U.S. military presence in Syria, which they disagree with. But he said the fact that both the U.S. and Russia are supposed to be opposed to ISIS in Syria, and with the continuing — and in some cases growing — presence of ISIS in Syria, “it seems like a very strange time to do this.”

So far the overflights have not affected U.S. military operations on the ground, but the U.S. or the international coalition against ISIS does respond to Russian aircraft, often shadowing them from afar. Grynkewich warned that if they had to respond to a Russian flight during a U.S. military operation on the ground, it could put the mission in jeopardy.

“What it is really is a distraction from the fight against ISIS,” he said. “It hasn’t affected the fight on the ground yet, but it certainly has the potential to.”

“I’m not concerned about overt hostilities, I’m concerned about a miscalculation or unprofessional or immature action by somebody.”

“Over the course of my career I have not seen this kind of disregard for agreed upon protocols and deconfliction rules,” he said. “So this is very unique, what we’re seeing right now.”

The Russian Embassy in Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Source (Archive)
 
So you can't name any other countries that back America?

The world is getting over American influence like it was a bad case of crabs. Just need to use a special shampoo twice a week to keep them from coming back.
1679602449514.png
Well, going off the resolution for Russia's invasion of Ukraine...
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: MrJokerRager
View attachment 4860765
Well, going off the resolution for Russia's invasion of Ukraine...
What, you painted all the brown countries in green? Good job.

You will never be a superpower. You have no allies, no leader, no international support. You are a regional power who briefly got to experience what it's like to be an empire but then promptly shat yourself and collapsed into a bunch of quibbling nation states.

You will be a footnote in the history books, mentioned only as "that place between Mexico and Canada", while China and Russia each get a whole chapter.
 
It's because the US can't stop being a puppet of Israel it seems. It's determined to screw around in Syria. So much so that they lied to Trump when he was in office about the exact number of US troops in Syria. This is probably against the law or breaks some rule about lying to a president. But I don't think the people in DC really care about that anymore. Only certain people have to obey laws and rules it seems.
 
Keeping a presence in Syria is far more costly to the US than to Assad/Iran/Russia/China at the moment. Those are all resources that the US could've redirected to Taiwan or Ukraine.

Considering the context of this particular thread this might honestly be the dumbest pro-Russian cope I've ever seen on this forum. And that's including your predictions of a horrific attritional death trap the Ukrainians would face on the road to Kherson when the Russians retreated, followed by footage of them entering the city hours later.

Are you seriously suggesting the US military is stretched so thin we cant afford to keep 900 people deployed in a theater we've operated in for over a decade but the Russian airforce has nothing better to do right now than slightly annoy US troops who according to you sit in their bases doing nothing ? If there's no threat in Syria shouldn't those forces be redirected to assist taking back the Russian territory that's been abandoned to the globohomo nazi/nato mercenaries ?

Its almost like there's no need for more Russian air assets in Ukraine at the moment. What exactly do you think is positioned in or around these Syrian positions that we would or could redirect to either Ukraine or Taiwan, because I'm coming up blank. I can't think of anything other than man portable weapons we could draw from probably ten other even less important areas before we would pull them from Syria assuming we don't have them in storage.

Also, your own allies are doing a good enough job at humiliating you now. [laughs in Turk]

Did the Turks shoot an American plane out of the sky and then have one of their own proxies kill the pilot with rifle fire while still descending ? The Turks are as allied with the US on the topic as Syria as they are with Russia, I'm pretty sure the powers that be would still prefer the Turks hold that border zone rather than Assad.

What exactly is your point ? That there's nuance to international politics ? Holy shit next you'll tell me Vichy France was formally at war with Germany for its entire existence.

So what exactly have you accomplished in Syria? Or Afghanistan, for the matter?

In Afghanistan ? Nothing.

In Syria ? Supporting a Kurdish insurgency that still holds 1/3 of the country.

Again, the only reason the US still has a presence in Syria is to avoid another humiliating withdrawal on Biden's watch.

Or maybe it costs almost nothing and there's no realistic prospect of us being forced out any time soon ?

Edit: And for yet another humiliation, another one of America's allies just turned their back on them.

A detente between Iran and KSA ? Sounds like we potentially just freed up a lot more resources than we have in Syria, maybe we can survive the crippling cost of staying there.
 
If there's no threat in Syria shouldn't those forces be redirected to assist taking back the Russian territory that's been abandoned to the globohomo nazi/nato mercenaries ?
Your post is too long and retarded to reply to entirely, but this is the most laughable statement yet. Russia has no shortage of manpower and equipment, so they can harass mutts all day long in Syria, and still churn through thousands of hohols and NATO mercs in Ukraine every day. They're not starving for planes, tanks, and shells like NATO.

Syria is a training ground for Russian troops, essentially. They practice on incompetent US-trained ISIS terrorists without any risk of retaliation.

The fact that you consider the US mission in Syria to be anything less than an abject failure tells me all I need to know about your knowledge and understanding of geopolitics and military matters.
Just a reminder, it started with "ASSAD MUST GO" and now it ends with 900 last US troops barricaded in their bases as Iranian drones blow them the fuck up while Russian planes are flying overhead.

I can name continents.
Antarctica doesn't count.

Edit: US morale in Syria looks bad, bros. Seems the poor bastards stationed there are willing to literally blow shit up just to get out.
 
Last edited:
As of 2022 there were about 900 US troops left in Syria. They're not tying up anything or anyone, as they don't leave their base out of fear of attacks.

Main reason they're not leaving yet is because a withdrawal will be embarrassing to the Biden admin. "Look, they're running away from Syria without accomplishing anything, just like in Afghanistan." While they're there, the mission isn't technically a failure yet.
What mission?
 
That isn't relevant to you pretending the US in Syria is a "we" issue and justifying the US presence there. It has nothing to do with ISIS either.
It is a 'we' issue when you drag others into your stupid bullshit, like causing a civil war, then feeding a bunch of psycho lunatics to go ape shit, then building bases to keep the lunatics away.
Typical redneck having the whole world spinning around his fat ass.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: MrJokerRager
It is a 'we' issue when you drag others into your stupid bullshit, like causing a civil war, then feeding a bunch of psycho lunatics to go ape shit, then building bases to keep the lunatics away.
Typical redneck having the whole world spinning around his fat ass.
Who is dragging you into shit in Syria? Aren't you Polish or something? I don't remember, but you're certainly retarded.
 
Shoot one down. Show them we mean business. If you don't want to risk war.. arrange for some locals to get their hands on a stinger or something. OC they wouldn't believe it but would they be willing to start a war over that belief? lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
'We' have a base in Syria because ISIS is still trying to fuck each other in the ass there.
What do you think ISIS stands for?

Why the fuck are "We" still in the middle east? Last time i checked, Europe and the USA are not in the middle east. Let them "fuck each other in the ass," maybe you go join them since you have a vivid imagination of it.
 
Why the fuck are "We" still in the middle east? Last time i checked, Europe and the USA are not in the middle east. Let them "fuck each other in the ass," maybe you go join them since you have a vivid imagination of it.
I think it has something to do with 'retaking' Iran, which was in the 'plan' way back since the 80s or some shit.
Also I don't have tom imagine anything. Muslims are some of the most gayest motherfuckers in the denial there ever were. Disgusting fags should jump off of rooftops themselves with the guys they keep throwing off after having them molested when they were kids.
And Americans, ow that is a whole other level of gay faggotry.
 
Back