Dramacow Arthur Racian Chu / arthur_affect - From Jeopardy Winner to Angriest Man on Twitter

[DavidFerrie]

To them the world is a simple place. They have themselves and their enemies. That is all there is to it. Black and white. You are either with them or against them. No hues, tints, tones, shades, or highlights. Just Black and white.

In a simple world like that, Sarah's faults don't matter because we would not care about them unless they were anti-gg. We are their persecutors and they are fighting for justice.

It is why they believe nothing they do can be wrong. When your enemy is evil, everything is permissible.

Again, identical to the worst of religious fanaticism. Take God out of the equation, and vindictive bigots will just substitute some other raison d'etre for their hatred.

 

[The Colonel]

Here's the website where you can donate to his documentary!
http://www.arthurchufilm.com/

 

[*Asterisk*]

Here's the website where you can donate to his documentary!
http://www.arthurchufilm.com/

He's still e-begging for this shit?

I also love how the "CONTACTS" section of the site is a dead link. Chu probably gets the Gorgeous George treatment every time he sets up something like that.

 

[Jaimas]

I don't understand this hive mind mentality at all. Because a pedo is supporting the same crap that's been plastered everywhere must make it legit to these people. Jesus Christ.

I can explain it.

You may not like the answer, though.

 

[A Random]

Go right ahead.

 

[chimpburgers]

I can explain it.

You may not like the answer, though.

Sure, I don't mind.

 

[Splendid]

I bet Frank Wu would let Chi fuck him, and then they'd all just call it "polyamory" and we'd get to watch their spastic posts on Zayne's group on Facebook.

 

[Jaimas]

Go right ahead.

Sure, I don't mind.

This is based around the general way Social Justice works as a movement.

Spoiler: In-depth Analysis

To understand how this kind of shit becomes defensible, you have to understand how Social Justice works on a strategic scale. It always has an agenda, but the likes of Social Justice infiltrating something, be it Vidya Gaems, Comics, Atheism, etc are not done in a vaccuum. I learned this mostly by watching Vade, but it's just as true of every single fucking Anti-GGer ever, so it holds water.

When Social Justice wants a foothold in something, traditionally to turn it into a mouthpiece and then an attack platform, it's a slow and often gradual process, one that is missed by onlookers who aren't aware of what's up. It always, invariably, begins, however, with a solo operative. In the case of FurryScumbags with Vade, this was Vade herself. In the case of SJWs in gaming or comics, it usually begins as one individual who was either a "diversity coordinator" or some other form of consultant.

After a short time of relative placidity, this initial operative will immediately - and often very quietly - engage in various forms of cronyism and outright subversion. Because Social Justice is heavily collectivist by nature, often to the point where it makes absolutely no sense, this cronyism is seen as a forgivable sin and necessary evil. What's more important is getting a beachhead established, and towards this end, the initial operative will act by working to convert sympathetic operatives and then promoting and/or hiring people who are 100% on-board with the Social Justice agenda. Anyone who opposes them are likely to be belittled and undermined actively, in an attempt to reduce their prominence or power. If the opposing force is the leader of a group, then SocJus operatives will rely upon the generally docile nature of the majority not paying super-close attention to push forward, until they can essentially render the opposing elements moot.

This continues until Social Justice controls a given community in its entirety. At this point, whatever the original purpose of the community, regardless of what it originally was designed for, who its original userbase was, et al, it will be turned into nothing more than an attack platform for further Social Justice operations.

For the ur-example of what a community looks like after SJWs have full control, take a good look at NeoGAF.

The thing is, they often run into resistance at some point. Communities with more individualistic or compartmentalized userbases are more likely to resist SJW incursion, and rightly see it for the attempt at colonization it basically is. Addititionally, Social Justice is never the majority on a given community. Ever. However, because it's so loud and so good at leveraging its yelling, it gets people to surrender via the equivalent of an angry mob's justice. They know they can't win via a fair fight, so they'll avoid having one at all costs. Towards this end, Social Justice actively attempts to enact ideological conformity and is noted for using specialist language - the ongoing Kiwi Farms glossary of SJW terminologies expands literally by the day because SocJus is always inventing new terms. This is intentional, since many "line" SJWs have large bodies of literary and/or academic work intended to baffle people who aren't familiar with these works and terms and browbeat them into simply agreeing rather than argue.

Because of that original sin that SocJus allows - cronyism for the so-called "greater good" - every other personal sin committed by Social Justice operatives quickly winds up dismissed the same way, and winds up put into the same category - until the point where they're defending pedophiles, ignoring it when one of them is caught openly breaking the law, or when they laugh off being openly disproven in the court of public opinion. That initial opening props the floodgates over, and atrocities soon follow.

In the minds of a Social Justice Warrior, it's all acceptable for a victory on the bigger front, so everything becomes a case where the end justifies the means. Remember how Bob Chipman once said that he felt there was no bad tactics? That's true of almost all SocJus lunatics. Deception, intimidation, and even outright violence are considered fair game because of this. A case like Vade's, where there's community-wide backlash is actually fairly rare and somewhat of an outlier.

Because of how this mindset gets integrated and because of the belief that it's all for the greater good, SJWs are capable of chilling levels of doublethink, and outright acts of zealotry. In their eyes, anyone who does not back SJW talking points is, in and of themselves, embracing a position of lesser morality, so they have no respect for minority dissenters or anyone who distances themselves from the narrative too much. In this regard, SJWs are some of the biggest hypocrites, since they actively attempt to "other" their critics and dismiss them outright. We've all seen and joked about "internalized misogyny" and "Listen and Believe," but their mindset specifically details that anyone who disagrees with them is either someone so stupid they cannot be trusted to speak for themselves, or someone who is an enemy and must be vanquished.

 

[AP 297]

This is based around the general way Social Justice works as a movement.

Spoiler: In-depth Analysis

To understand how this kind of shit becomes defensible, you have to understand how Social Justice works on a strategic scale. It always has an agenda, but the likes of Social Justice infiltrating something, be it Vidya Gaems, Comics, Atheism, etc are not done in a vaccuum. I learned this mostly by watching Vade, but it's just as true of every single fucking Anti-GGer ever, so it holds water.

When Social Justice wants a foothold in something, traditionally to turn it into a mouthpiece and then an attack platform, it's a slow and often gradual process, one that is missed by onlookers who aren't aware of what's up. It always, invariably, begins, however, with a solo operative. In the case of FurryScumbags with Vade, this was Vade herself. In the case of SJWs in gaming or comics, it usually begins as one individual who was either a "diversity coordinator" or some other form of consultant.

After a short time of relative placidity, this initial operative will immediately - and often very quietly - engage in various forms of cronyism and outright subversion. Because Social Justice is heavily collectivist by nature, often to the point where it makes absolutely no sense, this cronyism is seen as a forgivable sin and necessary evil. What's more important is getting a beachhead established, and towards this end, the initial operative will act by working to convert sympathetic operatives and then promoting and/or hiring people who are 100% on-board with the Social Justice agenda. Anyone who opposes them are likely to be belittled and undermined actively, in an attempt to reduce their prominence or power. If the opposing force is the leader of a group, then SocJus operatives will rely upon the generally docile nature of the majority not paying super-close attention to push forward, until they can essentially render the opposing elements moot.

This continues until Social Justice controls a given community in its entirety. At this point, whatever the original purpose of the community, regardless of what it originally was designed for, who its original userbase was, et al, it will be turned into nothing more than an attack platform for further Social Justice operations.

For the ur-example of what a community looks like after SJWs have full control, take a good look at NeoGAF.

The thing is, they often run into resistance at some point. Communities with more individualistic or compartmentalized userbases are more likely to resist SJW incursion, and rightly see it for the attempt at colonization it basically is. Addititionally, Social Justice is never the majority on a given community. Ever. However, because it's so loud and so good at leveraging its yelling, it gets people to surrender via the equivalent of an angry mob's justice. They know they can't win via a fair fight, so they'll avoid having one at all costs. Towards this end, Social Justice actively attempts to enact ideological conformity and is noted for using specialist language - the ongoing Kiwi Farms glossary of SJW terminologies expands literally by the day because SocJus is always inventing new terms. This is intentional, since many "line" SJWs have large bodies of literary and/or academic work intended to baffle people who aren't familiar with these works and terms and browbeat them into simply agreeing rather than argue.

Because of that original sin that SocJus allows - cronyism for the so-called "greater good" - every other personal sin committed by Social Justice operatives quickly winds up dismissed the same way, and winds up put into the same category - until the point where they're defending pedophiles, ignoring it when one of them is caught openly breaking the law, or when they laugh off being openly disproven in the court of public opinion. That initial opening props the floodgates over, and atrocities soon follow.

In the minds of a Social Justice Warrior, it's all acceptable for a victory on the bigger front, so everything becomes a case where the end justifies the means. Remember how Bob Chipman once said that he felt there was no bad tactics? That's true of almost all SocJus lunatics. Deception, intimidation, and even outright violence are considered fair game because of this. A case like Vade's, where there's community-wide backlash is actually fairly rare and somewhat of an outlier.

Because of how this mindset gets integrated and because of the belief that it's all for the greater good, SJWs are capable of chilling levels of doublethink, and outright acts of zealotry. In their eyes, anyone who does not back SJW talking points is, in and of themselves, embracing a position of lesser morality, so they have no respect for minority dissenters or anyone who distances themselves from the narrative too much. In this regard, SJWs are some of the biggest hypocrites, since they actively attempt to "other" their critics and dismiss them outright. We've all seen and joked about "internalized misogyny" and "Listen and Believe," but their mindset specifically details that anyone who disagrees with them is either someone so stupid they cannot be trusted to speak for themselves, or someone who is an enemy and must be vanquished.

A lot of other groups have elements of this too, though. Not just SJW's. Cults, forums, political parties, knight orders, etc. How does it unravel?

As for Arthur, does he get any real benefit from being in the swarm? He seems to be a very useful idiot.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

This is based around the general way Social Justice works as a movement.

Spoiler: In-depth Analysis

To understand how this kind of shit becomes defensible, you have to understand how Social Justice works on a strategic scale. It always has an agenda, but the likes of Social Justice infiltrating something, be it Vidya Gaems, Comics, Atheism, etc are not done in a vaccuum. I learned this mostly by watching Vade, but it's just as true of every single fucking Anti-GGer ever, so it holds water.

When Social Justice wants a foothold in something, traditionally to turn it into a mouthpiece and then an attack platform, it's a slow and often gradual process, one that is missed by onlookers who aren't aware of what's up. It always, invariably, begins, however, with a solo operative. In the case of FurryScumbags with Vade, this was Vade herself. In the case of SJWs in gaming or comics, it usually begins as one individual who was either a "diversity coordinator" or some other form of consultant.

After a short time of relative placidity, this initial operative will immediately - and often very quietly - engage in various forms of cronyism and outright subversion. Because Social Justice is heavily collectivist by nature, often to the point where it makes absolutely no sense, this cronyism is seen as a forgivable sin and necessary evil. What's more important is getting a beachhead established, and towards this end, the initial operative will act by working to convert sympathetic operatives and then promoting and/or hiring people who are 100% on-board with the Social Justice agenda. Anyone who opposes them are likely to be belittled and undermined actively, in an attempt to reduce their prominence or power. If the opposing force is the leader of a group, then SocJus operatives will rely upon the generally docile nature of the majority not paying super-close attention to push forward, until they can essentially render the opposing elements moot.

This continues until Social Justice controls a given community in its entirety. At this point, whatever the original purpose of the community, regardless of what it originally was designed for, who its original userbase was, et al, it will be turned into nothing more than an attack platform for further Social Justice operations.

For the ur-example of what a community looks like after SJWs have full control, take a good look at NeoGAF.

The thing is, they often run into resistance at some point. Communities with more individualistic or compartmentalized userbases are more likely to resist SJW incursion, and rightly see it for the attempt at colonization it basically is. Addititionally, Social Justice is never the majority on a given community. Ever. However, because it's so loud and so good at leveraging its yelling, it gets people to surrender via the equivalent of an angry mob's justice. They know they can't win via a fair fight, so they'll avoid having one at all costs. Towards this end, Social Justice actively attempts to enact ideological conformity and is noted for using specialist language - the ongoing Kiwi Farms glossary of SJW terminologies expands literally by the day because SocJus is always inventing new terms. This is intentional, since many "line" SJWs have large bodies of literary and/or academic work intended to baffle people who aren't familiar with these works and terms and browbeat them into simply agreeing rather than argue.

Because of that original sin that SocJus allows - cronyism for the so-called "greater good" - every other personal sin committed by Social Justice operatives quickly winds up dismissed the same way, and winds up put into the same category - until the point where they're defending pedophiles, ignoring it when one of them is caught openly breaking the law, or when they laugh off being openly disproven in the court of public opinion. That initial opening props the floodgates over, and atrocities soon follow.

In the minds of a Social Justice Warrior, it's all acceptable for a victory on the bigger front, so everything becomes a case where the end justifies the means. Remember how Bob Chipman once said that he felt there was no bad tactics? That's true of almost all SocJus lunatics. Deception, intimidation, and even outright violence are considered fair game because of this. A case like Vade's, where there's community-wide backlash is actually fairly rare and somewhat of an outlier.

Because of how this mindset gets integrated and because of the belief that it's all for the greater good, SJWs are capable of chilling levels of doublethink, and outright acts of zealotry. In their eyes, anyone who does not back SJW talking points is, in and of themselves, embracing a position of lesser morality, so they have no respect for minority dissenters or anyone who distances themselves from the narrative too much. In this regard, SJWs are some of the biggest hypocrites, since they actively attempt to "other" their critics and dismiss them outright. We've all seen and joked about "internalized misogyny" and "Listen and Believe," but their mindset specifically details that anyone who disagrees with them is either someone so stupid they cannot be trusted to speak for themselves, or someone who is an enemy and must be vanquished.

I wonder, who was the first SJW? Who is patient zero?

 

[Jaimas]

A lot of other groups have elements of this too, though. Not just SJW's. Cults, forums, political parties, knight orders, etc. How does it unravel?

As for Arthur, does he get any real benefit from being in the swarm? He seems to be a very useful idiot.

If I had to hazard a guess, Arthur does so out of personal guilt. IMHO, did something fucked in the past, and this is his way of dealing with it. Generally-speaking, the more aggressive the male feminist, the more likely it is they are to have engaged in personal impropriety on a biblical scale.

I wonder, who was the first SJW? Who is patient zero?

It's hard to tell. Like I told @Ron Paul 2024, a lot of the Social Justice assholes used to be Moral Majority assholes - there literally is no difference other than tactics. Authoritarians are authoritarians.

 

[Cosmos]

Holy fuck, that article about the Charlie Hebdo massacre turned my stomach. Personally, I dislike the magazine itself and I won't argue that it's fine literature, but the entire fucking point of the Je Suis Charlie movement is that absolutely no one deserves to get hurt or murdered over something as silly as a cartoon. And people weren't looking for an excuse to dogpile on Muslims; the immense outpouring of support for Charlie Hebdo was the result of years of pent-up frustration regarding fundamentalist Muslims and how they feel like they have the right to police the entire world's speech and threaten everyone into submission (see: The Satanic Verses controversy, Theo Van Gogh's murder, every single time Muhammad is depicted, etc).

Plus, the article was just in incredibly poor taste. Like, he was literally insulting and demeaning the victims of the Charlie Hebdo attacks before their bodies even cooled. It's fine if you're annoyed at how people near-deified Charlie Hebdo, but do you seriously have to write an entire article about what awful people you think they were?

So what I guess I'm saying is fuck Arthur Chu, let's roast him.

 

[Trombonista]

He has a Fail Fandom Anon article now. Apparently he supports Winterfox.

 

[The Colonel]

He's still e-begging for this shit?

I also love how the "CONTACTS" section of the site is a dead link. Chu probably gets the Gorgeous George treatment every time he sets up something like that.

No idea if he's still trying to get that shit made but we can all have a laugh at him even trying.

 

[Optimus Prime]

This is based around the general way Social Justice works as a movement.

Spoiler: In-depth Analysis

To understand how this kind of shit becomes defensible, you have to understand how Social Justice works on a strategic scale. It always has an agenda, but the likes of Social Justice infiltrating something, be it Vidya Gaems, Comics, Atheism, etc are not done in a vaccuum. I learned this mostly by watching Vade, but it's just as true of every single fucking Anti-GGer ever, so it holds water.

When Social Justice wants a foothold in something, traditionally to turn it into a mouthpiece and then an attack platform, it's a slow and often gradual process, one that is missed by onlookers who aren't aware of what's up. It always, invariably, begins, however, with a solo operative. In the case of FurryScumbags with Vade, this was Vade herself. In the case of SJWs in gaming or comics, it usually begins as one individual who was either a "diversity coordinator" or some other form of consultant.

After a short time of relative placidity, this initial operative will immediately - and often very quietly - engage in various forms of cronyism and outright subversion. Because Social Justice is heavily collectivist by nature, often to the point where it makes absolutely no sense, this cronyism is seen as a forgivable sin and necessary evil. What's more important is getting a beachhead established, and towards this end, the initial operative will act by working to convert sympathetic operatives and then promoting and/or hiring people who are 100% on-board with the Social Justice agenda. Anyone who opposes them are likely to be belittled and undermined actively, in an attempt to reduce their prominence or power. If the opposing force is the leader of a group, then SocJus operatives will rely upon the generally docile nature of the majority not paying super-close attention to push forward, until they can essentially render the opposing elements moot.

This continues until Social Justice controls a given community in its entirety. At this point, whatever the original purpose of the community, regardless of what it originally was designed for, who its original userbase was, et al, it will be turned into nothing more than an attack platform for further Social Justice operations.

For the ur-example of what a community looks like after SJWs have full control, take a good look at NeoGAF.

The thing is, they often run into resistance at some point. Communities with more individualistic or compartmentalized userbases are more likely to resist SJW incursion, and rightly see it for the attempt at colonization it basically is. Addititionally, Social Justice is never the majority on a given community. Ever. However, because it's so loud and so good at leveraging its yelling, it gets people to surrender via the equivalent of an angry mob's justice. They know they can't win via a fair fight, so they'll avoid having one at all costs. Towards this end, Social Justice actively attempts to enact ideological conformity and is noted for using specialist language - the ongoing Kiwi Farms glossary of SJW terminologies expands literally by the day because SocJus is always inventing new terms. This is intentional, since many "line" SJWs have large bodies of literary and/or academic work intended to baffle people who aren't familiar with these works and terms and browbeat them into simply agreeing rather than argue.

Because of that original sin that SocJus allows - cronyism for the so-called "greater good" - every other personal sin committed by Social Justice operatives quickly winds up dismissed the same way, and winds up put into the same category - until the point where they're defending pedophiles, ignoring it when one of them is caught openly breaking the law, or when they laugh off being openly disproven in the court of public opinion. That initial opening props the floodgates over, and atrocities soon follow.

In the minds of a Social Justice Warrior, it's all acceptable for a victory on the bigger front, so everything becomes a case where the end justifies the means. Remember how Bob Chipman once said that he felt there was no bad tactics? That's true of almost all SocJus lunatics. Deception, intimidation, and even outright violence are considered fair game because of this. A case like Vade's, where there's community-wide backlash is actually fairly rare and somewhat of an outlier.

Because of how this mindset gets integrated and because of the belief that it's all for the greater good, SJWs are capable of chilling levels of doublethink, and outright acts of zealotry. In their eyes, anyone who does not back SJW talking points is, in and of themselves, embracing a position of lesser morality, so they have no respect for minority dissenters or anyone who distances themselves from the narrative too much. In this regard, SJWs are some of the biggest hypocrites, since they actively attempt to "other" their critics and dismiss them outright. We've all seen and joked about "internalized misogyny" and "Listen and Believe," but their mindset specifically details that anyone who disagrees with them is either someone so stupid they cannot be trusted to speak for themselves, or someone who is an enemy and must be vanquished.

If I may suggest an addition to this excellent analysis, it's that the SJW mindset virtually works as a loose cult - much in the way Scientology does - by providing a sense of belonging to those seeking easy asspats and willing to follow any kind of thinking just to feel like they are part of something. Repetitive positive reinforcement brings them farther from reality and harder to break back to the logical world.

 

[Jaimas]

He has a Fail Fandom Anon article now. Apparently he supports Winterfox.

Holy shit, he's a supporter of Requires Hate?

And here I thought it wasn't possible for me to want to punch Arthur Chu more.

 

[Cynical]

Arthur just has to keep linking people to Brianna Wu's deadname:

http://www.salon.com/2015/10/29/vic...iest_way_to_help_the_worst_guys_win/#comments

 

[DavidFerrie]

This is based around the general way Social Justice works as a movement.

Spoiler: In-depth Analysis

To understand how this kind of shit becomes defensible, you have to understand how Social Justice works on a strategic scale. It always has an agenda, but the likes of Social Justice infiltrating something, be it Vidya Gaems, Comics, Atheism, etc are not done in a vaccuum. I learned this mostly by watching Vade, but it's just as true of every single fucking Anti-GGer ever, so it holds water.

When Social Justice wants a foothold in something, traditionally to turn it into a mouthpiece and then an attack platform, it's a slow and often gradual process, one that is missed by onlookers who aren't aware of what's up. It always, invariably, begins, however, with a solo operative. In the case of FurryScumbags with Vade, this was Vade herself. In the case of SJWs in gaming or comics, it usually begins as one individual who was either a "diversity coordinator" or some other form of consultant.

After a short time of relative placidity, this initial operative will immediately - and often very quietly - engage in various forms of cronyism and outright subversion. Because Social Justice is heavily collectivist by nature, often to the point where it makes absolutely no sense, this cronyism is seen as a forgivable sin and necessary evil. What's more important is getting a beachhead established, and towards this end, the initial operative will act by working to convert sympathetic operatives and then promoting and/or hiring people who are 100% on-board with the Social Justice agenda. Anyone who opposes them are likely to be belittled and undermined actively, in an attempt to reduce their prominence or power. If the opposing force is the leader of a group, then SocJus operatives will rely upon the generally docile nature of the majority not paying super-close attention to push forward, until they can essentially render the opposing elements moot.

This continues until Social Justice controls a given community in its entirety. At this point, whatever the original purpose of the community, regardless of what it originally was designed for, who its original userbase was, et al, it will be turned into nothing more than an attack platform for further Social Justice operations.

For the ur-example of what a community looks like after SJWs have full control, take a good look at NeoGAF.

The thing is, they often run into resistance at some point. Communities with more individualistic or compartmentalized userbases are more likely to resist SJW incursion, and rightly see it for the attempt at colonization it basically is. Addititionally, Social Justice is never the majority on a given community. Ever. However, because it's so loud and so good at leveraging its yelling, it gets people to surrender via the equivalent of an angry mob's justice. They know they can't win via a fair fight, so they'll avoid having one at all costs. Towards this end, Social Justice actively attempts to enact ideological conformity and is noted for using specialist language - the ongoing Kiwi Farms glossary of SJW terminologies expands literally by the day because SocJus is always inventing new terms. This is intentional, since many "line" SJWs have large bodies of literary and/or academic work intended to baffle people who aren't familiar with these works and terms and browbeat them into simply agreeing rather than argue.

Because of that original sin that SocJus allows - cronyism for the so-called "greater good" - every other personal sin committed by Social Justice operatives quickly winds up dismissed the same way, and winds up put into the same category - until the point where they're defending pedophiles, ignoring it when one of them is caught openly breaking the law, or when they laugh off being openly disproven in the court of public opinion. That initial opening props the floodgates over, and atrocities soon follow.

In the minds of a Social Justice Warrior, it's all acceptable for a victory on the bigger front, so everything becomes a case where the end justifies the means. Remember how Bob Chipman once said that he felt there was no bad tactics? That's true of almost all SocJus lunatics. Deception, intimidation, and even outright violence are considered fair game because of this. A case like Vade's, where there's community-wide backlash is actually fairly rare and somewhat of an outlier.

Because of how this mindset gets integrated and because of the belief that it's all for the greater good, SJWs are capable of chilling levels of doublethink, and outright acts of zealotry. In their eyes, anyone who does not back SJW talking points is, in and of themselves, embracing a position of lesser morality, so they have no respect for minority dissenters or anyone who distances themselves from the narrative too much. In this regard, SJWs are some of the biggest hypocrites, since they actively attempt to "other" their critics and dismiss them outright. We've all seen and joked about "internalized misogyny" and "Listen and Believe," but their mindset specifically details that anyone who disagrees with them is either someone so stupid they cannot be trusted to speak for themselves, or someone who is an enemy and must be vanquished.

You sound as if you've read this book.

 

[Jaimas]

You sound as if you've read this book.

No, I've just been fighting these assholes a long time.

One in particular (fuck yourself, Margaret Pless).

 

[MiloWuCollusion]

I wonder, who was the first SJW? Who is patient zero?

There is no patient Zero, outside of the spoken ideology... This behavior is as old as humanity. Behavior that is so old that there is infinite number of accounts of why is bad idea follow this practices as "greater good".