Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
So can people in Europe use vpns and shit to get around it?
Yes.

In fact, a US tech company could legit just pay for VPNs for all their european customers and laugh in the EU's face and there's not a damn thing they can do about it.
Europe will become an even bigger technological shithole than it already is.
I love this because no one's going to want to start an internet company in the EU. This drives more tech work to the US.
 
In fact, a US tech company could legit just pay for VPNs for all their european customers and laugh in the EU's face and there's not a damn thing they can do about it.

The big ones would have issues with this. Multinationals like Google have some physical or financial presence in nearly any country, which means assets that can be seized, and the EU has a habit of treating these things like a backdoor tax, setting impossible to achieve goals and then "fining" companies for failing to meet them.
 
The big ones would have issues with this. Multinationals like Google have some physical or financial presence in nearly any country, which means assets that can be seized, and the EU has a habit of treating these things like a backdoor tax, setting impossible to achieve goals and then "fining" companies for failing to meet them.
Yeah, no, a multinational couldn't.

But a smaller, US based company could. And it'd only take one to thoroughly embarrass the dinosaurs who thought this turd of a law up.

Would the EU demand all their ISPs block VPNs?
 
I don't know how much Kiwi Farms is aware of Madeleina Kay ("EU supergirl"), but her positive reaction to this bullshit goes to show how British remainers will now defend literally anything the EU does because of muh Brexit!

https://twitter.com/MadeleinaKay/status/1047406070103195648

I'm surprised that she doesn't have a thread here yet, she's a fairly prominent lolcow in the British political part of twitter.
 
I don't know how much Kiwi Farms is aware of Madeleina Kay ("EU supergirl"), but her positive reaction to this bullshit goes to show how British remainers will now defend literally anything the EU does because of muh Brexit!

https://twitter.com/MadeleinaKay/status/1047406070103195648

I'm surprised that she doesn't have a thread here yet, she's a fairly prominent lolcow in the British political part of twitter.
She's like how Null is with Israel but turned up to 11.
 
Last edited:
God I hope Brexit and the French riots tear the EU apart it's a good idea ruined by the greed and arrogance of the people at the top who rather than seeing it as a way for strong countries to get stronger by working together instead they saw it as their new way of making an empire. It's why Brexit pissed them off so much they started to see the power slipping.

Also I'm not too worried about the UK inheriting this law as we have seen constantly the UK is terrible at actually enforcing laws except for easy wins for PR points such as Twitter crimes and that keeps backfiring.
 
So lots of people in the US do want big government looking out and making sure nobody puts disagreeable material up on the internet. Because obviously they're the best arbiters of what's real news and what's fake news (Some "fake news" would include FBI spying on senators, Trump tower being wiretapped, etc.)

I think it's all around exploiting peoples emotions in order to lockdown the internet in a corporate sense. CNN, BBC, Facebook, Google, Youtube. These are the only websites you will ever need, any other website is obviously some crazy lunatic nazi rapist and can be ignored as fake news, so for your protection we have blocked all those websites.

After all, we don't want some sort of Trump happening in Europe, who wants to bring manufacturing back home and enforcing borders again. Sure it might be good in the long term, but I have a 6 month shareholder report to give, and a 1 year bonus to collect.
 
I can't wait for the Senate elections to arrive next month and for people to vote for the same shitty parties again. Doesn't matter if we fuck over our internet access or raise taxes so high people can barely afford to pay their bills, as long as we don't vote for those goddamn EU-hating Islamophobic alt-right fuckos. That'll show you deplorables.
 
Edit: Berlin youtubers are fucking gay they hold the demonstration on 23.03.2019.
Cologne holds tomorrow.



Berlin Kiwi here.

German youtubers want to hold demonstration tomorrow in Germany.
In Berlin are 3 shitty Youtuber on stage.

Two news youtuber.
"Mr. Trashpack"
Do I need to say more?
dzh.jpg


"Herr Newstime"
herrnewstimetubetime.png



one Vlogger (and lolcow) "Tanzverbot"
DD3p-n8W0AAe5CA.jpg

I think I will go tomorrow to the demo for Kiwi TV
Yuusha-sama is live on site for Kiwi farms!!!!


Have fun at this fucking trash fire.
 
Last edited:
Back