Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
why can I get better reports of these things on kf than from any mainstream news source, how fucking backwards is current year

"A hundred thousand people have taken to the streets, protesting against a directive locking them in to visit our sites where we forcibly start embedded videos to drive clicks to fake having more visitors even though they just want to skim the text of our clickbait, over to Dietrich for analysis and polls of what people think of us!"
 
why can I get better reports of these things on kf than from any mainstream news source, how fucking backwards is current year
because mainstream media is run by hacks who think the Enquirer and its ilk are the greatest thing since sliced bread or who feel the need to put in social justice BS into their articles.

They will enforce it on big media platforms like YouTube or Facebook, at least they will try.
But they're American, and unless the EU forces Trump or Google to follow it, all they're going to do is cut them off until the EU dissolves or some shit. Which is undoubtedly worse for those who don't have VPNs than the shit they're trying to pull right now.
 
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/eu-article-13-vote-article-17

European politicians have voted to pass Article 13 and Article 11 as part of sweeping changes to regulation around online copyright. The European Parliament passed the legislation by 348 votes to 274.

Opponents had hoped for last-minute amendments to be made to the legislation, but failed to garner enough votes. Julia Reda a German MEP representing the Pirate Party who opposes the copyright directive said it was a “dark day for internet freedom”.


A vote on debating amendments – including an amendment to remove Article 13 and the Article 11 ‘link tax’ from the broader copyright legislation – was rejected by just five votes.

Member states now have two years to pass their own laws that put Article 13 into effect.

In a statement, YouTube said the final version of the EU Copyright Directive was “an improvement” but that it remained “concerned” that Article 13 could have “unintended consequences that may harm Europe’s creative and digital economy”.

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, which represents the global record industry, welcomed the outcome of the vote. “This world-first legislation confirms that user-upload content platforms perform an act of communication to the public,” said CEO Frances Moore.

The days before the vote were dominated by protests across Germany, with tens of thousands of people taking to the streets to protest against what is perceived by many as online censorship.

At its core, the overarching Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market is an attempt by the European Union to rein in the power of big technology companies. Article 13 will make platforms legally responsible for all the copyright content they host.

The proposals put copyright holders up against major technology firms and protesters concerned that the legislation would limit freedom of speech. The onus to stop copyrighted content from being uploaded to sites such as YouTube is a sharp departure from existing legislation governing how online platforms operate.

Critics of Article 13 have argued that there’s only one way platforms could do this: upload filters. These automatically check all uploaded content to see whether it’s copyrighted or not. If the filter detects copyrighted content – it doesn’t make it onto the platform.

But concerns have been raised about how that will work in practice.
 
Fuck Europe #Dexit
I was in Berlin at the Protest, up 30000 people.
Munich up to 50000
Cologne up to 20000
Suttgart up to 10000
and many more people and protests(23 alone in Germany).

Here are some of my vids I took.





















































WOW

















How long the line of people was.
 
Really regretting giving up your guns now aren't you eurocucks?
Yeah, guns has helped to stop FOSTA, Net Neutrality and God knows what else. Wherever you look, the Internet is fucked. Null put it best: "Say "nigger" on the internet every day, because someday you won't be able to."
 
Member states now have two years to pass their own laws that put Article 13 into effect.

So what is the penalty if a member state says "fuck you, we won't do it"?


And if they don't they take the country to court and impose a penalty, what if the member state refused to pay? Are the EU going to send bailiffs around to seize government assets maybe put a lien on parliament buildings?

Seriously fuck the EU it only has as much authority as we're willing to give it.
 
Now would be an excellent time to look into using Tor and VPNs for those of you living in Nazi Germany 2 Electric Boogaloo.

This fucking insanity is almost enough to make me support Brexit.
You didn't support Brexit before?

I for one am waiting for the snooty dis attached media to tell us why this is a good thing.

Really regretting giving up your guns now aren't you eurocucks?
Let's be real, even if they had them and used them for anything, everyone currently supporting a revolution would 180 and call it terrorism. Everyone against it would certainly call it terrorism, the whole world would condemn it in a heartbeat. When your government fucks you over, the only moral response anyone will accept is to lay down and die, and not the gasoline fire protest kind of death either.
Fuck Europe #Dexit
I was in Berlin at the Protest, up 30000 people.
Munich up to 50000
Cologne up to 20000
Suttgart up to 10000
and many more people and protests(23 alone in Germany).
See, your mistake was believing that protesting matters to your government.
 
Last edited:
Back