Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
I hope every time people search their names, they pop up in memes and that they are Volksverräter( Traitor of people).
Memes dont work if the target isnt online... just write a couple of emails to the local office of the party and bully them into kicking out the MPs. its pretty easy in germany. you just need enough people bullying.
 
I just found out this passed because an EU hosted discord I'm in deleted its fucking meme channel. Fuck...
Disregard me, I'm fucking retarded and that was actually an elaborate troll that fooled me and others, including one user who went gloriously apeshit over it thinking it was real. The article still passed though, so I'm wondering what that'll do to the EU.

Time for rare pepe backups?
 
If anything, laws like this will break up this homogenic landscape dominated by monopolies
Yeah we definitely won't see small websites fail to ever reach a significant size because they can't afford to pay the one company that ends up maintaining the upload filter database its outrageous fees. This won't stile the competition of large websites at all.
 
This will be unenforceable in any but the biggest sites, like Facebook and Youtube, so nothing of value will be lost. If anything, there will be less cancerous meme stealery from smaller/abroad sites, but who cares about that?

Maybe this will lead to a slippery slope distopia of death squads at your door if you illegally post memes, but I doubt it'll come to that... in our lifetime, anyway.
 
This will be unenforceable in any but the biggest sites, like Facebook and Youtube, so nothing of value will be lost. If anything, there will be less cancerous meme stealery from smaller/abroad sites, but who cares about that?

Maybe this will lead to a slippery slope distopia of death squads at your door if you illegally post memes, but I doubt it'll come to that... in our lifetime, anyway.

Won't cost a thing to enforce it, the copyright holders are the ones who will be searching for violations because they can now get money from it.
 
The same people who now bitch about this shilled for the EU until just a few months ago because "we need to prevent another war in Europe wah wah wah" and call themselves "European" and voted for cuckservatives and libtards who have never NEVER cared about freedom at all. And now some fucking, I dunno, "influencer" on Jewtube or something told them that article 13 will take away their stupid cat pictures and SUDDENLY they care, that's the straw that broke the camels back, now they're protesting on the street (which they didn't fucking have to if they just hadn't voted the traitors into power in the first place) and it's all for nothing anyway because guess what, your holy EU doesn't care what you think because it's a fundamentally undemocratic institution and its only purpose is to impose the will of sociopathic German and French politicians on the whole continent.

I say fine, let the reddit and facebook users suffer, everyone smart enough to use a VPN should hardly be concerned anyway.
 
You people realize the "meme ban" won't actually ban memes? The whole thing's about the (((copyright holders' lobby))) and news sites fighting against large content aggregators, there's even exemptions for legitimate uses (parody, review, whatever) in the fucking directive. Google is now making a lot of noise, because they'll have to spend some money expanding their (already existing) content ID system. Oh, and the law won't even apply to smaller or new companies.

When the copyright law finally gets implemented in 2021, it will affect nothing and nobody even remembers it at that point. This outcry is the most retarded thing since fidget spinners.
 
Sorry if someone else had already posted it, but vlogger Computing Forever put a rant about this.

Some Youtube commented with some replies to this video.
They will turn people to go darkweb. There are already systems ready to free the internet. You cant kill an idea.

5 minutes ago
Indeed. The Techpriests of the Internet have seen this coming for years and have always developed technical solutions to issues of censorship. The internet was always built to withstand interference from bad actors. Naturally each solution will eventually be rendered ineffective, but new ones will always be coming along behind them. Make no mistake this is an arms race - but it is a technical one, not a political or legislative one, and since the internet has massive technical resources and knowledge, this is one war that the lawmakers can never win. They may win the occasinal battle but they are doomed to lose the war. A perpetual game of whack-a-mole is the best they can hope for, just as with the censorship of torrent sites over the past few years. I certainly don't know anyone who has any problems getting access to them. The EU could try banning VPNs and/or TOR, as China did (not that it stops the more determined Chinese people from accessing the content they need) but that's pretty tough in practice as lots of businesses use VPNs as part of their corporate infrastructure, and TOR is pretty much essential for effective journalism today, even in the mainstream media so while this new legislation is certainly unwelcome, I don't think it's going to be the end of a free internet. It may wound it somewhat, but it won't kill it. The internet will survive, because the internet is a lot smarter than the politicians (although that's a pretty low bar to be honest)
 
Back