Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
I think he has enough reasons to leave Sweden, Article 13 or not.
It's not really like Islamism is good for my Nationalist instincts either way, so whatever.

Doesn't article 13 only affect the countries that signed? You reckon Sweden will bend further and follow this law? Sweden doesn't follow every EU law as far as I am aware.
They will with this one. The Social democratic party of Sweden (Former Nazi party that castrated and ensured mass sterilization of minorities in the 1930 - 1970s), Had i reckon around 5 Voters that was on the Article 13 + 11 Request. 3 Of them gave it a go ahead, which means 3 of those 5 that were required for the storm to turn around, is the fault of the Swedish Social Democrats. If only them had voted Yes, and 2 others in some other damn Europe country would've also voted Yes to not let it through, we wouldn't be in this shitstorm to begin with.
 
It's not really like Islamism is good for my Nationalist instincts either way, so whatever.
yeah switching from "Syrians" to Pakis isn't that much of a change.
They will with this one. The Social democratic party of Sweden (Former Nazi party that castrated and ensured mass sterilization of minorities in the 1930 - 1970s), Had i reckon around 5 Voters that was on the Article 13 + 11 Request. 3 Of them gave it a go ahead, which means 3 of those 5 that were required for the storm to turn around, is the fault of the Swedish Social Democrats. If only them had voted Yes, and 2 others in some other damn Europe country would've also voted Yes to not let it through, we wouldn't be in this shitstorm to begin with.
I believe it's rigged they just wanted the illusion that the kids would nearly changed something.
"They heard us.".
That the backlash wouldn't be to hard.
This would have gone through one way or another.
 
Last edited:
They will with this one. The Social democratic party of Sweden (Former Nazi party that castrated and ensured mass sterilization of minorities in the 1930 - 1970s), Had i reckon around 5 Voters that was on the Article 13 + 11 Request. 3 Of them gave it a go ahead, which means 3 of those 5 that were required for the storm to turn around, is the fault of the Swedish Social Democrats. If only them had voted Yes, and 2 others in some other damn Europe country would've also voted Yes to not let it through, we wouldn't be in this shitstorm to begin with.
Well, that blows. :/
 
So, I was at a protest to actually do something against an actual threat which still can be prevented, instead of sperging on the internet about genocidal fringe ideologies (yes, I am looking to you, Alt-Right and SJWs).

So, let us begin:
25781060e65991807b32cc00cccf185e5698290bd8e40fa986c28283627bdc53a7e66eed.jpg


This says: #NeverAgainCDU*
*the political party behind Article 13
17293053a06ab374dc35e984e0e1df373661d2652f1d5a0cd997beb8d042a34b218f226e.jpg


This shows (((Axel Voss))) who started the whole Article 13 thing and says "[2000s punkrock slang]! Fake news! There are no upload filters, we call those identification software now! We obey you citizens even if ye may not like some [censored]." No guess what the last sentence actually meant, though.
254410560f0c8e53243ad4501466babc43db2a9176444c49c7a9e2dc0b8e231fe000d38b.jpg


This here: "Is it possible that we politicians are being controlled by corporate influence? No, it is the voters! They get commands from Google!
80215540aa0aa34957fd87381771983f5cc560f343974019a7d0610d36b90712c33b49a0.jpg


It is just a coincidence that the evil article from the new copyright reform is numbre 13, right? Right?!?!
729553992720b0ad7aa0eb57a7b8f127d030d668457055dd975583c1d88142f3f12411e7.jpg


Pepe the Nazi Frog also joined the event, feels good man, does it? Even though he is classificated as a hate symbol and showing this cartoon frog is an IRL bannable offense in my country.
107323262c0b32b84983753ae5254f58ad43ba53cb2e6c85ea03906b7565572c1d42117d.jpg


Still, we have the chance to stop all this until 9th April.
 
Last edited:
https://boingboing.net/2019/03/26/jfc-fml-jfc.html


Article 13 will wreck the internet because Swedish MEPs accidentally pushed the wrong voting button
1JJDL6DqSLp4iEmPGTBpydA.png


jfc-fml-jfc.html

FROM THE BOING BOING SHOP









FOLLOW US
Twitter / Facebook / RSS
In the EU, if a Member of the Parliament presses the wrong button on a vote, they can have the record amended to show what their true intention was, but the vote is binding.
Today, the European Parliament voted to pass the whole Copyright Directive without a debate on Articles 11 and 13 by a margin of five votes.
But actually, a group of left-leaning Swedish MEPs have revealed that they pressed the wrong button, and have asked to have the record corrected. They have issued a statement saying they'd intended to open a debate on amendments to the Directive so they could help vote down Articles 11 and 13.
We lost on a technicality, and there is no recourse.
This is the most significant piece of internet regulation ever undertaken by a democratic government (that is, excluding Russian and Chinese internet regulations). It will do untold damage to the whole internet.
And it's because someone pushed the wrong button.
It's the Edward Tufte apocalypse. It'd be funny, if it didn't make me want to smash my laptop.
SD have now announced that they’ll add to the record that they intended to vote differently, but that doesn’t change the vote itself. When it comes to voting buttons in the European Parliament, what’s pressed is pressed.
Thus, Parliament was stopped by only a single vote from voting on the decision to delete Articles 11 and 13 of the Directive. One wrongly-pushed button fewer, and the result for all of Europe could’ve been very different.


Captain Sweden strikes again
 
NIGGO KILLO said:
Today, the European Parliament voted to pass the whole Copyright Directive without a debate on Articles 11 and 13 by a margin of five votes. But actually, a group of left-leaning Swedish MEPs have revealed that they pressed the wrong button.
No, it wasn't the Social Democrats that voted in favor of it despite meaning to vote against it (although MEP Marita Ulvskog also pressed the wrong button, but she voted against it despite wanting to vote in favor of it). It's much more ironic than that, because the two MEPs who "mistakenly" (read: probably sold out to lobbyists) voted in favor of the directive belong to the "euroskeptic" and "Sweden-Friendly" Sweden Democrats. https://medium.com/@emanuelkarlsten...t-motion-to-amend-articles-11-13-731d3c0fbf30
707092

The Sweden Democrats have been doing a shit job defending themselves so far and even most SD voters are making fun of them.
 
This says: #NeverAgainCDU*
*the political party behind Article 13
All 3 mainstream partys are in favour of censorship, the greens just want it to be more political.
Die PArtei Die PARTEI is the only Party you can vote for, Sonneborn is funny and doesnt back down.
 
So how is this going to affect international business? Are they going to exploit this to retain monopolies or are they going to jump ship from how unmaintainable this is? This is obviously extremely anti-business, just not sure how much money major international corporations are willing to blow on maintaining it (obviously they're prefer nothing, but it's the cost-benefit thing here)
 
Last edited:
So how is this going to affect international business? Are they going to exploit this to retain monopolies or are they going to jump ship from how unmaintainable this is? This is obviously extremely anti-business, just not sure how much money major international corporations are willing to blow on maintaining it (obviously they're prefer nothing, but it's the cost-benefit thing here)
Google/Youtube have all reins in their hands, they are the only ones who can make a filter,
technology- and money wise.
If the EU says they should buy licences they can take their business elsewhere(China).
And even if they cut us off, they'll make a lot of money selling us their filter technology.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Unog and heathercho
They will with this one. The Social democratic party of Sweden (Former Nazi party that castrated and ensured mass sterilization of minorities in the 1930 - 1970s), Had i reckon around 5 Voters that was on the Article 13 + 11 Request. 3 Of them gave it a go ahead, which means 3 of those 5 that were required for the storm to turn around, is the fault of the Swedish Social Democrats. If only them had voted Yes, and 2 others in some other damn Europe country would've also voted Yes to not let it through, we wouldn't be in this shitstorm to begin with.

It's funny that so many people are spurging about getting Nord VPN. It's even advertised at the top of this page.

The one I access is based in the USA, which does have its own issues - but if you're using it mostly to download a TV show (while USA has issues with that, Germany does to a greater extent) I don't think it's too problematic. I'm looking into getting one from somewhere else, but am not having any luck.
 
It's funny that so many people are spurging about getting Nord VPN. It's even advertised at the top of this page.

The one I access is based in the USA, which does have its own issues - but if you're using it mostly to download a TV show (while USA has issues with that, Germany does to a greater extent) I don't think it's too problematic. I'm looking into getting one from somewhere else, but am not having any luck.
Private Internet Access (often known as PIA) is probably the best VPN for most things.
 
Back