Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
I can't put into words how fucking mad I am.

What kind of a signal is this? If anyone had any doubts about how shitty the EU Lobbyism is, this should settle it once and for all. With all the shit people did in the past to address this nonsensical issue, people like Axel Voss and all those other lobby-money-sluts just ignored it.
First they called the people who wrote E-Mails mere bots and ignored them. During the numerous protests, the same politicians accused the protesters of being paid for by internet instigators so they could ignore them.
I am so insanely fed up with this bullshit. These clowns in Brussel do whatever the fuck they want and frankly, the ways of democracy don't work. Every stop has been pulled, everything has been done. E-Mails, phone calls, protests, polls, petitions. Everything that democracy offers to tell the higher ups how the people feel. And they laughed in our faces, grabbed their share of lobby shekels and voted against the interest of any citizen, any company (that isn't a huge, anachronistic publisher) anyone who knows the least bit about the internet and software.
 
Private Internet Access (often known as PIA) is probably the best VPN for most things.

Regardless of what VPN you use, I recommend not using one with your name or attached to a normal bank account. Bonus if your regular internet is cable. From what I understand (I was not the person who signed up) if you have moved since you signed up for it, they can't track you down even if they do have your IP address, so long as you didn't update your address with the company. Not like that matters if you don't sign up with your name and bank account. I'm sure the government could track you down if they wanted to, but I assume/hope they're more interested in going after pedophiles and sex traffickers versus someone posting a meme about some politician being a Hurenson.
 
I wanna congratulate Sweden again for proving theyre the biggest cucks and retards on the european continent.Their MEP's pushed the wrong button,enough to burn down the european internet space.If you felt pity before for Sweden then you shouldnt,you should feel unending hatred for a country who have lost their identity long ago while also getting blacked by immigrants.
So if youre from Europe and have a swedish friend tell them:youre an idiot and your country sucks muslim nuts.
 
According to this picture, the vote mistakes might actual be in earnest because the way the buttons and the machine in general is laid out is exceptional.

707843


Why hide them away like that? What purpose does it serve if they can or cannot see your votes? It's not as if it will be anonymous forever.
Also, if that slot holds only a single hand. which is likely, then guess where you index finger falls if you're right-handed.
 
According to this picture, the vote mistakes might actual be in earnest because the way the buttons and the machine in general is laid out is exceptional.

View attachment 707843

Why hide them away like that? What purpose does it serve if they can or cannot see your votes? It's not as if it will be anonymous forever.
Also, if that slot holds only a single hand. which is likely, then guess where you index finger falls if you're right-handed.
because they're cowards? If you're a representative of your country, your country should know what you are actually voting for, all the time. Like Mexico here:

707862
 
I can't put into words how fucking mad I am.

What kind of a signal is this? If anyone had any doubts about how shitty the EU Lobbyism is, this should settle it once and for all. With all the shit people did in the past to address this nonsensical issue, people like Axel Voss and all those other lobby-money-sluts just ignored it.
First they called the people who wrote E-Mails mere bots and ignored them. During the numerous protests, the same politicians accused the protesters of being paid for by internet instigators so they could ignore them.
I am so insanely fed up with this bullshit. These clowns in Brussel do whatever the fuck they want and frankly, the ways of democracy don't work. Every stop has been pulled, everything has been done. E-Mails, phone calls, protests, polls, petitions. Everything that democracy offers to tell the higher ups how the people feel. And they laughed in our faces, grabbed their share of lobby shekels and voted against the interest of any citizen, any company (that isn't a huge, anachronistic publisher) anyone who knows the least bit about the internet and software.
except this affects literally zero people.
The EU is about as effective as toe nail clippings are at intimidating people.
 
except this affects literally zero people.
The EU is about as effective as toe nail clippings are at intimidating people.
The EU has repeatedly dragged several companies to court and squeezed money out of them.
These Uploadfilters are what they want or what they are paid to want, so they are going to force companies to implement them.
I don't share your optimism that this will be a paper tiger that will never be enforced. However I hope that when it gets enforced, so much shit goes down the crapper that they have to dial back their bullshit as fast as possible. Stuff like Facebook, Youtube, Wikipedia etc, IP banning the EU.
Maybe that would wake up some idiots that didn't pay attention to all this.
 
The EU has repeatedly dragged several companies to court and squeezed money out of them.
These Uploadfilters are what they want or what they are paid to want, so they are going to force companies to implement them.
I don't share your optimism that this will be a paper tiger that will never be enforced. However I hope that when it gets enforced, so much shit goes down the crapper that they have to dial back their bullshit as fast as possible. Stuff like Facebook, Youtube, Wikipedia etc, IP banning the EU.
Maybe that would wake up some idiots that didn't pay attention to all this.
that won't happen. what they want is insanely expensive, to the point that these tech companies will just say "fuck it" and ban any IP coming from a country that implements the EU ruleset that the EU wants.

to be fair, companies like google won't be affected since they have the tech already. however, places like dailymotion or imgur will have to pay thousands for this tech unless for some reason google is feeling charitable (if you believe they will be I have an immortality elixir for you).

once the IP banning happens, the EU has 2 choices; try to sue or dial back their bullshit. option 1 leads to companies saying "we don't do business with you anymore, leave us alone".
 
I want europe to fire up google, make a search, and see like 2 government approved results. That's their whole fucking internet. Fuck you assholes, you got what you wanted.

Sorry to the non-assholes who got dragged along in this nonsense.
No one wanted this. Normies don't even know this shit happened (gee, I wonder why, MSM) and everyone else tried to oppose it with everything that's available within a democracy and nothing stuck.

There is only one last, ultimate chance to stop this, when enough governments refuse to agree to this thing. 65% of the population of Europe (as represented by their respective Governments) have to support this shit, if enough countries tell Brussel to fuck off, this can be stopped.
Chances of that are unlikely, though.

I am legitimately confused on what to make of this shitshow. All I am learning is that playing nice by adhering to the rules of democracy apparently isn't enough, especially since your own side will only get invalidated by being accused of many ridiculous things. Maybe we need to turn Brussel into a second Paris and just get out our yellow vests. The least thing that I hope for is that all the disllusioned young people that were mobilized in the wake of this a travesty will take this lecture to heart and never, ever give a fucking vote to those parties that supported this crap, full stop.

that won't happen. what they want is insanely expensive, to the point that these tech companies will just say "fuck it" and ban any IP coming from a country that implements the EU ruleset that the EU wants.
The EU will force companies to buy blanket-licenses for copyrighted material, that's what the big publishing houses are after.
You post the content of a news article from a website on a forum, that forum will need to have a blanket-license for material from that website. It's a moneymaking scam implemented by the highest (and most undemocratic) body of government in the EU and it utterly disgusts me.

to be fair, companies like google won't be affected since they have the tech already.

They don't. Google might have an algorithm that detects whether or not you used copyrighted material somewhere in your video/song/image, but it's certainly not smart enough to understand in what context it was used. If it's under fair use, you'll still get flagged. The system can literally only block anything it finds or block nothing at all and guess what option a greedy company that wants to avoid lawsuits is going to choose.
And then there's plain fuckups where an artist gets his shit flagged cause the algorithm tells him he's violating his own copyright.
 
Last edited:
Not surprising, but also I don't really care because I haven't cared about those normal parts of the internet in years. The only way upload filters could effectively hold me from doing anything I set out to do if they'd be applied at the level of my ISP and also can somehow encrypt the data that I pass through them transparently. ¯\(ツ)

Also lol at the burgers who think every law that somehow limits the internet will also not affect them or be a template for something their government will try.
''Normal parts of the internet'' Where the fuck have you been? Deep Web?
 
to be fair, companies like google won't be affected since they have the tech already. however, places like dailymotion or imgur will have to pay thousands for this tech unless for some reason google is feeling charitable (if you believe they will be I have an immortality elixir for you).

Oh Jesus, I just realized this is basically the end of Dailymotion because they're based out of France. Oh well, best time to take advantage of it while we still can.
 
I can't put into words how fucking mad I am.

What kind of a signal is this? If anyone had any doubts about how shitty the EU Lobbyism is, this should settle it once and for all. With all the shit people did in the past to address this nonsensical issue, people like Axel Voss and all those other lobby-money-sluts just ignored it.
First they called the people who wrote E-Mails mere bots and ignored them. During the numerous protests, the same politicians accused the protesters of being paid for by internet instigators so they could ignore them.
I am so insanely fed up with this bullshit. These clowns in Brussel do whatever the fuck they want and frankly, the ways of democracy don't work. Every stop has been pulled, everything has been done. E-Mails, phone calls, protests, polls, petitions. Everything that democracy offers to tell the higher ups how the people feel. And they laughed in our faces, grabbed their share of lobby shekels and voted against the interest of any citizen, any company (that isn't a huge, anachronistic publisher) anyone who knows the least bit about the internet and software.
I'd hazard a guess that the average Article 13 protester is very similar to the average Gamergater, so the boomers in Brussels assumed that they were worthless basement-dwelling neckbeards and disregarded.
 
First they called the people who wrote E-Mails mere bots and ignored them. During the numerous protests, the same politicians accused the protesters of being paid for by internet instigators so they could ignore them.
They were just Faggots. Its not that hard to email bomb their whole familys if you have 20k people to write them.
 
EU will look for any way possible to steal money from the large tech companies since many of their countries are so desperate for cash right now and why they didn't want Brexit to happen. It's long been overdue to end the European Union, many of those countries would be better off for it. Hell, there's no reason for it and has actually done more harm than good, just like the UN.
 
Back