Disaster Article 13 has passed : EU - Eurocucks - your memes have no home here. All amendments rejected.

Article 13 approved by European Parliament by 438 votes to 226
September 12, 2018







Tags: Article 13 europe safe harbour
european-commission-1500x500.jpg



MEPs have voted to pass the much-discussed Article 13 of the European Copyright Directive. Of the 751 politicians voting on the directive today in Strasbourg, 438 voted in favour, 226 against and 39 abstained.


View image on Twitter




Sylvie Guillaume

✔@sylvieguillaume




Soulagement après le vote sur la directive #droitdauteur. L'Europe de la diversité culturelle renforcée, une presse indépendante et la liberté d'expression préservées après le vote du rapport @AxelVossMdEP. Les négociations vont pouvoir enfin débuter avec le Conseil.

9:02 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






This section of the proposed legislation would make internet platforms liable for copyrighted content uploaded by their users:

“Article 13 creates an obligation on information society service providers storing and giving access to large amounts of works and other subject-matter uploaded by their users to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders and to prevent the availability on their services of content identified by rightholders in cooperation with the service providers”

This would remove the ‘safe harbours’ that have been a long-term bugbear for music rightsholders, who see them as responsible for the ‘value gap’ between the music royalties paid by platforms like YouTube, and those that do not benefit from safe harbours, like Spotify and Apple Music.

Critics of Article 13 argue that it would damage key principles of free expression online by forcing platforms to filter anything that might be copyrighted content, while also damaging the chances of small internet startups to compete with giants like Google/YouTube, who can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars building tools like the latter’s ContentID to comply with the legislation.

The news is already being celebrated by music rightsholders and their representative bodies, but will come as a blow to the technology companies and activists who had been campaigning against the proposal.

Independent body Impala was one of the first to hail the news, describing it as a “great result for creators”. Boss Helen Smith had published an opinion piece earlier this week defending the proposed legislation. “Nobody in our community is suggesting ‘tearing down the internet.’ What we are asking lawmakers to do is to make sure that it works for everyone,” she wrote.




IMPALA@IMPALAMusic




1f44f.png
1f44f.png
1f44f.png
MEP @AxelVossMdEP Proposal wins the vote, great result for creators #EuropeforCreators

8:59 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Paul Pacifico, boss of UK independent body AIM, hailed the vote as “a great day for music and culture in Europe” in a tweet shortly after the vote. He also published an opinion piece this week, criticising the lobbying tactics of companies and organisations who had opposed Article 13.




Paul Pacifico

✔@allstarspaul




A great day for culture and music in #europe as the #copyrightdirective is adopted by @Europarl_EN including #article13 - thank you #MEPs from all parties for your energetic and highly engaged approach to this very sensitive and important legislation.

9:06 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






Google provided this statement to Music Ally following the vote. “People want access to quality news and creative content online,” said a spokesperson. “We’ve always said that more innovation and collaboration are the best way to achieve a sustainable future for the European news and creative sectors, and we’re committed to continued close partnership with these industries.”

[Also passed today was Article 11, which focuses more on the news side of things.)

MEP Julia Reda, who had been one of the prominent critics of the proposals, summarised the fears in a tweet posted after the vote was carried.


View image on Twitter




Julia Reda

✔@Senficon




Article 13 vote: The European Parliament endorses #uploadfilters for all but the smallest sites and apps. Anything you want to publish will need to first be approved by these filters, perfectly legal content like parodies & memes will be caught in the crosshairs #SaveYourInternet

8:57 PM - Sep 12, 2018


Twitter Ads info and privacy






We’ll be covering reactions to the news in the coming hours here, so check back on this story regularly for updates.
https://musically.com/2018/09/12/article-13-approved-by-european-parliament-by-438-votes-to-226/

EU approves controversial internet copyright law, including ‘link tax’ and ‘upload filter’
3
Key provisions were amended to reduce potential harm, but critics say vote is ‘catastrophic’
By James Vincent@jjvincent Sep 12, 2018, 7:12am EDTSHARE
wjoel_180317_2415_002_social.0.0.jpg

The European Parliament has voted on changes to the Copyright Directive, a piece of legislation intended to update copyright for the internet age. In a session this morning, MEPs approved amended versions of the directive’s most controversial provisions: Articles 11 and 13, dubbed by critics as the “link tax” and “upload filter.”

Article 11 is intended to give publishers and newspapers a way to make money when companies like Google link to their stories, while Article 13 requires platforms like YouTube and Facebook to scan uploaded content to stop the unlicensed sharing of copyrighted material. Critics say these two provisions pose a dire threat to the free flow of information online, and will be open to abuse by copyright trolls and censors.

READ MORE: EU COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE: WHAT’S AT STAKE
Defenders of the Copyright Directive and its controversial clauses say this is an unfair characterization. They point to existing laws and newly-introduced amendments that will block the worst excesses of this legislation (like, for example, a law that excuses parodies and memes from copyright claims). They say that the campaign against the directive has been funded by US tech giants eager to retain their control over the web’s platforms.

In remarks following the vote in Parliament this morning, MEP Axel Voss, who has led the charge on introducing Articles 11 and 13 thanked his fellow politicians “for the job we have done together.” “This is a good sign for the creative industries in Europe,” said Voss.

Opposing MEPs like Julia Reda of the Pirate Party described the outcome as “catastrophic.”

It’s important to note that this is far from the end of the story for the Copyright Directive and its impact on the web. The legislation approved today still faces a final vote in the European Parliament in January (where it’s possible, though very unlikely, it will be rejected). After that, individual EU member states will still get to choose how to put the directive in law. In other words, each country will be able to interpret the directive as they see fit.

Developing...
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved

 
Last edited:
However I hope that when it gets enforced, so much shit goes down the crapper that they have to dial back their bullshit as fast as possible. Stuff like Facebook, Youtube, Wikipedia etc, IP banning the EU.

At the moment, lots of news sites based in the USA block German IPs, since Germany has "privacy" laws. You have to use a proxy or Archive to read the news article. I hope this happens with even larger sites, including social media.
 
At the moment, lots of news sites based in the USA block German IPs, since Germany has "privacy" laws. You have to use a proxy or Archive to read the news article. I hope this happens with even larger sites, including social media.

My small business (that shall not be named, obviously) already blocks all EU IPs, just so I don't have to bother my customers with stupid fucking cookie notification popups. This isn't going to affect me since I already got far the fuck away from the EU's viciously anti-business practices a while ago.
 
At the moment, lots of news sites based in the USA block German IPs, since Germany has "privacy" laws. You have to use a proxy or Archive to read the news article. I hope this happens with even larger sites, including social media.

This gave me an idea I'd like to field to the tech savvy people, is it possible to use a proxy server for all incoming traffic from a specific place when they visit a website?
 
I'm not too teksavvy, but maybe you could write code to recognize any IP coming from a EU server and run it through a proxy? Something like 'If [IP from Germany] Then run: proxy program'
 
This gave me an idea I'd like to field to the tech savvy people, is it possible to use a proxy server for all incoming traffic from a specific place when they visit a website?
It'd be easier to set up a proxy server on your end to connect to KF or whatnot than for KF filter all incoming traffic for that kind of redirect. Null uses Cloudflare as a reverse proxy for DDOS mitigation and whatnot, so on some level there is a service between incoming traffic and the KF web server, but I'm honestly not familiar enough with Cloudflare to know if adding those kinds of custom rules to send all EU traffic through a different, additional proxy server is possible.
 
At the moment, lots of news sites based in the USA block German IPs, since Germany has "privacy" laws. You have to use a proxy or Archive to read the news article. I hope this happens with even larger sites, including social media.
Don't know a single news site that blocks my German IP. Closest I can think of is NPR which directs to a plain-text site if you don't accept their tracking cookies (don't think they even have ads - it's just retarded Facebook/Twitter integration).
 
Though (((Axel Voss))) of the German CDU party was the main evil behind the infamous Article 13, that copyright reform was mainly backed by French membres of parliament in the last vote. The idea of the reform also originated in France.

Maybe I am wrong but did (((President Macron))) not say something about a stronger copyright immediately after he took office like two years ago?

D2pjPa9XgAEWr55.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Exterminatus
Though (((Axel Voss))) of the German CDU party was the main driver behind Article 13, the copyright reform was mainly backed by French membres of parliament. The idea of the reform also originated in France.

Maybe I am wrong but did (((President Macron))) not say something about a stronger copyright immediately after he took office like two years ago?

D2pjPa9XgAEWr55.jpg
There's also a rumor based on what a newspaper (forgot which) found out, meaning that France and Germany had a bit of a deal going where Germany spearheads France's shitty Copyright laws while France will agree to the Northstream Pipeline plans.
Currently, various German politicians (mainly from the CDU) stumble over another to announce that they want to implement these filters as quickly as possible.

Again, I can't put into words how disgusted I am. Maybe it's time I save up some money to obtain a gun while I still can.
 
Though (((Axel Voss))) of the German CDU party was the main driver behind Article 13, the copyright reform was mainly backed by French membres of parliament. The idea of the reform also originated in France.
Yeah the French wanted the upload filters. Article 11 (which is part of the Copyright directive they just passed) is the German idea, modelled after this recently introduced German law designed to print money for large publishers like Axel-Springer.
Germany agreed to Article 13 so that the French will in turn agree to Article 11 (and the new Russian pipeline).
 
  • Like
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed
The records have been amended, but the result won't be re-visited

I love that that's even possible.

Some EU Politician said:
Oh no you see, I totally meant to vote against it! Let's just fix up the record so that whoopsie never happened even though it won't change the outcome, and you can be absolutely assured I truly, sincerely have your best interests at heart, dear voters!
 
There's also a rumor based on what a newspaper (forgot which) found out, meaning that France and Germany had a bit of a deal going where Germany spearheads France's shitty Copyright laws while France will agree to the Northstream Pipeline plans.
Le France and der Deutsch Reich are the main forces behind anything la Europa Unio does. Seems like Europe is going to have to be saved by Murica for the third time.

Again, I can't put into words how disgusted I am. Maybe it's time I save up some money to obtain a gun while I still can.
President Macron is currenly busy changing laws to make it possible to use the military against protestors and to legalise police brutality. Germany also wants to reform police laws and double its military budget. So, a gun would not be any good against tanks and jet planes.
 
Last edited:
Le France and der Deutsch Reich are the main forces behind anything la Europa Unio does. Seems like Europe is going to have to be saved by Murica for the third time.


President Macron is currenly busy changing laws to make it possible to use the military against protestors and to legalise police brutality. Germany also wants to reform police laws and double its military budget. So, a gun would not be any good against tanks and jet planes.
Yeah, you gotta invest in some portable SAMs and some RPGs. How much can such a system even cost? I'm sure you just have to ask your local police for permission.
 
Back