Culture Associated Press: Stop Misgendering Ships, Storms, And Nations - AP Style guide changes guidance. Countries, Ships and Storms are no longer She/Her. Instead will use It/Its


Associated Press: Stop Misgendering Ships, Storms, And Nations​


The Associated Press issued a new update to their style guide Monday focused on how best to use the pronoun “she” in various contexts.

Apparently we’re not supposed to use the “she” pronoun when discussing “nations, ships, storms, or voice assistants,” The AP Stylebook’s official Twitter shared in an update on Monday. Who knew we’d been misgendering random, genderless objects that don’t procreate for so long? Shame on us.
1661227790554.png

Jokes aside, there are certain elements of AP’s update that may not sit well with those who use the term “she” to refer to ships. Describing ships as “she” is a tradition as old as time itself.

The tradition reportedly stems from the idea that one’s ship is a “female figure such as a mother or goddess guiding and protecting a ship and crew,” according to Imperial War Museums. One of the few examples of ships being gendered as “he,” came from Captain Ernst Lindemann of the Bismark battleship, which he did in “view of its awesome power,” the museum site noted.


It feels like referring to ships as “she,” is less of a decision that AP gets to make, and more of a personal choice. Similarly, referring to a nation as “she” is apparently a callback to our “motherland” and hasn’t really been used widely for decades, The Hill noted.

As for storms, naming them after women seems to have originated from an Australian meteorologist, Clement Wragge, who used to entertain himself by choosing names of women, mythical figures, and politicians he didn’t like, Britannica reported. Who can blame, Wragge? He started doing this in the 1890s, so it’s not like there was much else to do to kill time.

Amazingly fun fact: in the 1970s, feminists fought to have the tradition of naming storms changed to include male names. The move was met with resistance because apparently people “would not take storms seriously if names did not evoke images of female fury,” The Washington Post reported. Call me crazy, but that made me feel pretty powerful. Can we have a Storm Kay, please?

By 1978, we started using a range of different methods to name storms that use both male and female proper nouns for people, The Washington Post added. In terms of misgendering voice assistants, The AP can blame Apple and Amazon for creating “Siri” and “Alexa.”

Of course, none of this is relevant to how you write about nations, ships, storms, or voice assistants. I just really love writing about weather, history, and naming conventions, I guess.
 
i wonder how alexa, cortana, siri will feel when referred to as "it"

gonna be like in that south park post-covid movie, they gonna rebel against us all
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Elim Garak
in other news, kiwifarms users think AP guidelines matter and seethe over it
im gonna seeeeetheee
AP conventions will absolutely trickle down into the Normieverse--'member how "illegal aliens" morphed into "undocumented immigrants," or how "homeless guy" became "guy experiencing homelessness"?

It's a stupid change that literally nobody has ever asked for in the history of forever. As the saying goes, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." They're fixing something that doesn't require fixing to further assert control over language.
 
I think vessels are female because they carry you around inside them like your Mom did. As far as linguistic traditions go it's elegant, it's poetic, it's wholesome... Keelhaul the filthy commies beneath HER hull and bury their postmoderrn deconstruction at sea with them!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
No and fuck right the hell off!

Where the hell is this coming from BTW?! I mean I understand the stupid argument being used but not the actual "logic"?!
 
"homeless guy" became "guy experiencing homelessness"?
where my friend where?
now if you search the incorrect spelling of homless, you are bound to find atleast something but that doesn't mean it is the norm

no one here owns a boat, let alone a ship but still acting as if their mother remarried
 
Why does anyone take the AP seriously? In 2020, they released a guide for their fellow journoswine to use Black and white when referencing race because power + privilege. Really, they’re just caving to the woke culture the upper echelons of society are trying to force on everyone else.

I really don’t care if inanimate objects are referred to as either male or female, other languages do it all the time (like Spanish). Actually, if they tried this with Spanish, as all nouns are gendered, it would make the language so confusing. Now I want AP to try this with Spanish to see how many people would get pissed off, as gendered words matter a lot more in that language than in English.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
Fuck off, AP. Yes, yes, I know, it is Current Year™️, and that means all things old must go, but seriously, fuck off. What in God's name is wrong with these naming conventions, precisely, other than them being inanimate objects? I thought wahmen stronk, so why is it suddenly no bueno to dub ships and killer storms with female pronouns?
Because women can't have anything nice thanks to feminists, and calling ships/storms she is exclusionary to rapist men in dresses and mutilated titless BPD lunatics.
 
This is so vapid and pointless that I don't really see how anyone could really be angry at it. Maybe it will trickle down to other news outlets people are deciding to not read in droves because it's become more propaganda and lies than actual news, but in real life, this will change nothing.

Who cares?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
Back