Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner — and the window for a return flight is closing

Archive/Sauce

Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner — and the window for a return flight is closing​


Two NASA astronauts who rode to orbit on Boeing's Starliner are currently stranded in space aboard the International Space Station (ISS) after engineers discovered numerous issues with the Boeing spacecraft. Teams on the ground are now racing to assess Starliner's status.

Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were originally scheduled to return to Earth on June 13 after a week on the ISS, but their stay has been extended for a second time due to the ongoing issues. The astronauts will now return home no sooner than June 26th, according to NASA.

IMG_9459.jpeg

After years of delays, Boeing's Starliner capsule successfully blasted offon its inaugural crewed flight from Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 10:52 a.m. EDT on June 5. But during the 25-hour flight, engineers discovered five separate helium leaks to the spacecraft's thruster system.

Now, to give engineers time to troubleshoot the faults, NASA has announced it will push back the perilous return flight, extending the crew's stay on the space station to at least three weeks.

"We've learned that our helium system is not performing as designed," Mark Nappi, Boeing's Starliner program manager, said at a news conference on June 18. "Albeit manageable, it's still not working like we designed it. So we've got to go figure that out."

The return module of the Starliner spacecraft is currently docked to the ISS's Harmony module as NASA and Boeing engineers assess the vital hardware issues aboard the vessel, including five helium leaks to the system that pressurizes the spacecraft's propulsion system, and five thruster failures to its reaction-control system.

After powering the thrusters up on June 15, engineers found that most of these issues appeared to be at least partially resolved, but their exact causes remain unknown.

However, the Harmony module's limited fuel means Starliner can only stay docked for 45 days, so the window for a safe return flight is narrowing.

The issues are the latest in a long list of setbacks and headaches for Boeing's spacecraft. The company built the Starliner capsule as a part of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, a partnership between the agency and private companies to ferry astronauts into low Earth orbit following the retirement of NASA's space shuttles in 2011. SpaceX's Crew Dragon also came from this initiative and has racked up 12 crewed flights since it began operating in 2020.

But Starliner's first uncrewed test flight in 2019 was scuppered by a software fault that placed it in the wrong orbit, and a second attempt was held back by issues with a fuel valve. After more reviews last year, the company had to fix issues with the capsule's parachutes and remove around a mile (1.6 kilometers) of tape that was found to be flammable.

The current mission is Boeing's third attempt to take the crew to the ISS. The previous two were scrubbed by a vibrating oxygen valve on the United Launch Alliance's Atlas V rocket on which Starliner was mounted (and which was developed by Lockheed Martin) and a computer glitch in a ground launch sequencer, respectively.
 
Problem is there's only 2 other options:
  1. Soyuz, a Russian spacecraft that is in basically unmodified since the 1960s and is remarkably reliable with only 2 fatal accidents (the second one made it widespread for all, of mandatory spacesuits for launch and landing, so even if the cabin is depressurized, the crew is kept alive in their suits)
  2. SpaceX, Elon's masterpiece which flies 4 astronauts
So, you either got evil Musk which the current Biden administration and liberal media and Boeing seethes daily at(Boeing because SpaceX killed their monopoly on billion dollar contracts to launch satélites for the US government using 1960s rockets for twice as much as a falcon 9)
Or Putin, which would be the pinnacle of bad press for both:
"A evil nazi rescuing 2 astronauts?!? Also isn't Russia supposed to be all inept and dumb idiots who can't do nothing right?"


They most likely won't die in a reentry if the capsule leaks atmosphere, but the helium is used for the maneuvering thrusters, so if it fails, they can't control it anymore and they probably will burn on re-entry.

I don't doubt like Columbia that NASA will be politically forced to risk it and probably kill 2 astronauts, just so to not give Musk or Putin the time of the day.
If I was up there, I'd want the Russians. The cosmonauts generally come home. The astronauts should not be risked for the sake of Boeing's share price.

But they will be. See: 737 MAX
 
I re-read Harry Harrison's Skyfall the other day. Probably ill-timed, on my part.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Vesperus
I guess this is why both the Repubs and Dems are bitching out the Boeing CEO lately. Not that anything will ever come of it, of course.
 
Good job agent 47, you've brought the assassinations to space. This is a horrifying fuckup on boeing's part.
I'd play a Hitman mission where you ride a space lift to a space station to assassinate some nerd from NASA. Or where you infiltrate an alien base on Mars wearing a rubber costume.
 
I don't doubt like Columbia that NASA will be politically forced to risk it and probably kill 2 astronauts, just so to not give Musk or Putin the time of the day.​
Absolutely fucking not. Crew Dragon was supposed to be the alternative for Starliner when it was being developed, the whole reason why NASA even agreed to SpaceX's crewed flight spacecraft was for another option in case the established guys with a zillion man-hours of experience had a hiccup. Nobody is going to risk two astronauts in a pissing match for one, but for two it makes SpaceX look objectively better if they die because they died aboard the shitty CST-100 in the middle of the "Everything Boeing Makes Kills You!" shitstorm.

What might happen is Boeing decides to lie, cheat, or steal to make the return flight happen and make sure it's manned because if they don't it will be yet another PR disaster. NASA is willing to err on the side of caution but if the manufacturer says it is good to go they will likely defer to that opinion. When they don't do that they get things like Challenger, where the Thiokol flat out said that he will not sign off on the SRB at those temps. Killing a schoolteacher on live television in front of her entire class haunts NASA more than anything else, so they defer to manufacturers unless it is an obviously terrible idea.
 
I just think that the rockets they make are overpromising, like with the point-to-point travel that they said they were planning a few years back
Elon exaggerates, yes, but the products that actually end up in service aren't burning trashfires like what Boeing has been pumping out. SpaceX is making most of their competition laughable, which is pathetic with how long some of their competitors, like Boeing, have been around and just how much support they get from governments. As far as I'm aware the Dragon capsules haven't come too close to killing anyone yet, and they have been used a lot more. They also beat the Starliner to market.
 
Elon exaggerates, yes, but the products that actually end up in service aren't burning trashfires like what Boeing has been pumping out. SpaceX is making most of their competition laughable, which is pathetic with how long some of their competitors, like Boeing, have been around and just how much support they get from governments. As far as I'm aware the Dragon capsules haven't come too close to killing anyone yet, and they have been used a lot more. They also beat the Starliner to market.
We shall wait and see, altough I'm mostly just mad at the lack of focus that the guy has. He may just be the CEO and not one of the engineers designing the actual rockets, but when your boss is dealing with a pick-up EV that looks straight out of a PS1 game, neuroelectronic devices, vaccum tunnels, rockets, solar roadways, one bazillion satellites, robots, etc, things won't go smooth sailing
 
  • Like
Reactions: melty
When the statliner disentegrates in the atmosphere after LaShaqueeesha the product safety manage at boeing has garaunteed "evrefing" was "aight" will that kill Boeing? I know that a bunch of regular fliers are already making sure their flights arent on boeings. What happens when Boeing schoolteacher's a bunch of stronk independant space women?
 
Back