Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner — and the window for a return flight is closing

Archive/Sauce

Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner — and the window for a return flight is closing​


Two NASA astronauts who rode to orbit on Boeing's Starliner are currently stranded in space aboard the International Space Station (ISS) after engineers discovered numerous issues with the Boeing spacecraft. Teams on the ground are now racing to assess Starliner's status.

Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were originally scheduled to return to Earth on June 13 after a week on the ISS, but their stay has been extended for a second time due to the ongoing issues. The astronauts will now return home no sooner than June 26th, according to NASA.

IMG_9459.jpeg

After years of delays, Boeing's Starliner capsule successfully blasted offon its inaugural crewed flight from Florida's Cape Canaveral Space Force Station at 10:52 a.m. EDT on June 5. But during the 25-hour flight, engineers discovered five separate helium leaks to the spacecraft's thruster system.

Now, to give engineers time to troubleshoot the faults, NASA has announced it will push back the perilous return flight, extending the crew's stay on the space station to at least three weeks.

"We've learned that our helium system is not performing as designed," Mark Nappi, Boeing's Starliner program manager, said at a news conference on June 18. "Albeit manageable, it's still not working like we designed it. So we've got to go figure that out."

The return module of the Starliner spacecraft is currently docked to the ISS's Harmony module as NASA and Boeing engineers assess the vital hardware issues aboard the vessel, including five helium leaks to the system that pressurizes the spacecraft's propulsion system, and five thruster failures to its reaction-control system.

After powering the thrusters up on June 15, engineers found that most of these issues appeared to be at least partially resolved, but their exact causes remain unknown.

However, the Harmony module's limited fuel means Starliner can only stay docked for 45 days, so the window for a safe return flight is narrowing.

The issues are the latest in a long list of setbacks and headaches for Boeing's spacecraft. The company built the Starliner capsule as a part of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, a partnership between the agency and private companies to ferry astronauts into low Earth orbit following the retirement of NASA's space shuttles in 2011. SpaceX's Crew Dragon also came from this initiative and has racked up 12 crewed flights since it began operating in 2020.

But Starliner's first uncrewed test flight in 2019 was scuppered by a software fault that placed it in the wrong orbit, and a second attempt was held back by issues with a fuel valve. After more reviews last year, the company had to fix issues with the capsule's parachutes and remove around a mile (1.6 kilometers) of tape that was found to be flammable.

The current mission is Boeing's third attempt to take the crew to the ISS. The previous two were scrubbed by a vibrating oxygen valve on the United Launch Alliance's Atlas V rocket on which Starliner was mounted (and which was developed by Lockheed Martin) and a computer glitch in a ground launch sequencer, respectively.
 
Are they under military style orders? What happens if they refuse to come down unless it’s a tried and tested conveyor?
Dunno about the orders, but if they refuse to come down? Well, you'd have to send someone up to force the issue. But astronauts are not chucklenuts, so every other astronaut knows that if they're saying "No, fuck that" that its probably for damned good reason. Good luck finding someone willing to go up and try and tie an unwilling passenger into a return capsule. If you're gonna send up a second flight, might as well just send up a safer capsule to let them come home on.

The only real pressure to bring them down is that the junker is holding up a docking bay that's otherwise needed for resupply missions, but they could always remote deorbit it if it came down to it. Of course, it'd be a career ending move, but I'd rather survive as a retired astronaut than die as a commissioned one. and frankly, I doubt NASA would really have the leverage to actually shitcan them - They'd likely get political support and interference from people wanting to stick it to Boeing and stop some of the shit thats being going on, not to mention NASA not wanting to throw Astronauts under the bus if they can at all help it.

So that guy who got decoompressed is he dead or what?
Running story is still "Training Tape", so unless the return trip explodes, we'll know when the guy lands. Decompression injuries are pretty brutal to the skin and eyes, so the cameras watching them wheel the folks out are gonna see the damage - eyes mighta cleared up by now, but the skins still liable to be fucked as microgravity prevents the wounds from healing right, fucks with fluid flow.
 
Dunno about the orders, but if they refuse to come down? Well, you'd have to send someone up to force the issue. But astronauts are not chucklenuts, so every other astronaut knows that if they're saying "No, fuck that" that its probably for damned good reason. Good luck finding someone willing to go up and try and tie an unwilling passenger into a return capsule. If you're gonna send up a second flight, might as well just send up a safer capsule to let them come home on.

The only real pressure to bring them down is that the junker is holding up a docking bay that's otherwise needed for resupply missions, but they could always remote deorbit it if it came down to it. Of course, it'd be a career ending move, but I'd rather survive as a retired astronaut than die as a commissioned one. and frankly, I doubt NASA would really have the leverage to actually shitcan them - They'd likely get political support and interference from people wanting to stick it to Boeing and stop some of the shit thats being going on, not to mention NASA not wanting to throw Astronauts under the bus if they can at all help it.


Running story is still "Training Tape", so unless the return trip explodes, we'll know when the guy lands. Decompression injuries are pretty brutal to the skin and eyes, so the cameras watching them wheel the folks out are gonna see the damage - eyes mighta cleared up by now, but the skins still liable to be fucked as microgravity prevents the wounds from healing right, fucks with fluid flow.
Wait, was that confirmed? Was this the bit where they broadcast an emergency and then said hahah only sorry it was just a training thing? What happened ?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vecr
Wait, was that confirmed? Was this the bit where they broadcast an emergency and then said hahah only sorry it was just a training thing? What happened ?
Yes, that is still the current official line, that it was an extremely poorly timed training tape broadcasting. I'm not aware of any further evidence of anyone being hurt or being confirmed ok, just very quietly moving on after that statement.

I have my doubts about it, especially since the training communications have no reason to end up going through the official broadcasts in the first place like that - If its a simulated emergency for ground control, it doesn't need to be beamed up into space. However, its also not an easy thing to hide, so its doubtful they'd try. Especially since, if as suspected, the injury was due to starliner fucking up. It'd explain more of the reluctance to return crew when they also insist "it won't have any impact at all", as a pressure failure in a capsule is one of those things that causes them to explode on reentry. But it also means that it'd take a huge political hands on their shoulders to not just say "Its not safe to return" if that was the case, bigger than I think anyone can really leverage right now.

Whole situations a bit weird, which is why I'm just waiting to see the condition of the return crew.
 
In Sir John Hackett's "The Third World War" there is a chapter about warfare in space. Basically, the crew of an american space craft gets stranded up there during the four weeks the war on the ground lasts after they were hit by a Soviet laser weapon. Since everyone was busy with the war in Europe and the fact that spy satelites needed to be replaced nearly daily due to intensive anti-sat warfare conducted by the Soviet Union, NASA had no spare resources to conduct a resuce operation. Thus, the three or four astronauts became the first to die in space combat ever.

I never would have imagined this has a slight chance of ever happening, in particular not in the cool way during a war. Oh no, this is clownworld. It will happen in the most hilarious way possible, under the most incompetent and embarrassing circumstances imaginable.
World War Z (book) had this too. The astronauts of the ISS have to fend for themselves as the major launch sites get overrun. They end up making a heroic effort, surviving their little famine, to keep the telecommunications network up and running and do eventually make it home, but absolutely emaciated and filled with all the cancer in the world from solar radiation.
 
This all confirms my decision to buy the space LEGO sets because apparently building LEGO Artemis stuff is as close as we're ever going to get to a moon colony.
With the rate and success of China's Lunar missions, there is a good possibility they'll succeed at being the to get to the moon in 5 decades, probably six, really, by the time it happens with current year space development, seeing as everything so far has been automated test beds or as in their last, a sampling mission. This is if Artemis takes so long it fails to get western astronauts there first, of course, but even in the event that happens there is zero way we're seeing a US moon base maybe even by 2040. If China is actually the first to do this, since they've already managed to be the first country to put up their own solo space station since MIR that'll be fucking embarrassing.
 
Are they under military style orders? What happens if they refuse to come down unless it’s a tried and tested conveyor?
Technically no. This is actually not a matter of law that has been tested since no Astronaut has engaged in mutiny or disobedience to command. That said though, NASA is the operative agency involved in these missions, and NASA is a civilian independent agency answerable only to the President.

So if push came to shove, the Commander of the Boeing mission would be classified as an officer of the Merchant Marine as a matter of law (if not practice) and his crew Merchant Mariners.

Military Law only applies to Merchant Mariners in time of War. Barring that, Officers of the Merchant Marine are essentially God almighty, especially when their vessel is in international waters. Which the ISS most certainly qualifies as.

I don't think NASA actually has the legal authority to order the commander of the Starliner mission to do anything if he feels the order contravines his primary duty of care to the vessel and it's crew.

They would have to escalate the issue to a senior officer. Which in the case of NASA the only Officer of the United States superior to a space vessel captain is the President. Even the Chief Administrator of NASA is not actually an Officer, constitutionally speaking. He is a mere civil Servant.
 
So, uh, why haven't there been any hearings on how the US government plans on getting them down?
There's not really anything to hold a hearing over. Either they come down on the Starliner once Boeing satisfies NASA that the capsule can safely return their two astronauts, or NASA asks Elon to do the needful and send a Dragon up to fetch them. This is an embarrassment, but not an emergency.

Congress ought to be holding hearing on what the fuck Boeing is doing with our tax dollars though.
 
This is actually not a matter of law that has been tested since no Astronaut has engaged in mutiny or disobedience to command.

Depends on your definition of "Mutiny". During Apollo 7 there was a lot of tension between the astronauts and ground control. At the end of the mission Commander Schirra disobeyed a direct order and refused to have the crew wear their helmets during reentry because they all were suffering from a headcold. None of the astronauts were reprimanded but they never flew again.

 
Back