Culture At E3 this year, videogames bigots have lost - It's 2018 bigots!

Four years ago a row hit the games industry like an atomic bomb.

The treatment of women, within both the industry and the games themselves, was being scrutinised like never before. And, as journalists predicted that “gamers are over”, an angry, and at times vicious, movement emerged: Gamergate.

Supporters of Gamergate would say it was about “ethics in games journalism”. But it was quite openly more often than not about something else: women, minorities and hatred of so-called “social justice warriors” - the “SJWs” - as if social justice was something to be avoided.

It was a row that would go on to consume lives and careers, creating celebrities of likes of Milo Yiannopoulos as it went. In many respects, Gamergate was a dress rehearsal for what we refer to today as the alt-right.

In the new game, The Last of Us Part 2, Ellie is the lead. And as the trailer commences, we see her dancing slowly with a woman, her girlfriend, and they exchange a passionate kiss. The crowd cheered - not like excitable schoolboys seeing two girls make out, but like adults who had followed Ellie’s story and cared about the outcome.

“I think they were trying to make it clear to people that this is what they’re about,” said Julian Rizzo-Smith, a gay games journalist from Australia, whom I bumped into after the event.

“I think it was really setting a benchmark for what their future plans are. It’s a perfectly fine reflection of society. If you have a problem that it’s the biggest game of the show, that’s on you.”

Sony doesn’t stand alone in this. Microsoft, with its Xbox, also used one of its biggest titles this year - Gears 5 - to make a statement. For the first time in the franchise the lead character will be a woman, the ferocious Kait.

“It felt like a natural way to pivot the franchise a little bit,” said developer Rod Fergusson, speaking to Wired magazine. “And allow you to actually play the true hero of the story.”

Predictably, the decision raised some ire from certain corners of the gaming community.

“It’s amazing that Microsoft and The Coalition decided to take the most testosterone-driven, male-centric third-person shooter brand on the market and still find some way to inject it with third-wave feminism,” wrote the One Angry Gamer blog, decrying the “diversity agenda” in games.

'We're in 2018'

Across town, at an event hosted by EA, there’s a line of people baking under the LA sun in the hope of getting a chance to play Battlefield 5. For the first time, players will be able to play as a woman in that.

When news of the new game was published online, a backlash ensued, with some fans left incensed that adding women into the game would not be historically accurate. A hashtag, #notmybattlefield, was born.

Checking in with what’s left of the Gamergate movement these days finds little discussion about “ethics in games journalism”.

As I type this, topics on one of the movement’s most popular forums revolves around anger over the imprisonment of far-right figure Tommy Robinson, female Wikipedia editors, and how the left has supposedly infiltrated the games industry (and, by extension, everything else too).

What were once referred to as the “thinly-veiled” elements of Gamergate are now fully visible.

But it no longer matters. As I leave Los Angeles, with another E3 behind us, it’s clear that the Gamergate way of thinking has lost. The industry has stepped up - and video games will be all the better for it.


https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44504344
 
They’re never going to let GamerGate die, will they? Barely anyone has a problem with a female lead (Metroid and Tomb Raider proves this), it’s a matter of whether or not it’s historically accurate to history spergs. When you tout that you’re being as historically accurate as possible, I’m pretty sure jumping out of a building, and having a female sniper with a prosthetic arm may raise some eyebrows, espcially with how they’re dressed.

I’m also sure barely anyone cares about sexuality. It’s when you let superficial traits try and define your game that turns people away.
 
They’re never going to let GamerGate die, will they? Barely anyone has a problem with a female lead (Metroid and Tomb Raider proves this), it’s a matter of whether or not it’s historically accurate to history spergs. When you tout that you’re being as historically accurate as possible, I’m pretty sure jumping out of a building, and having a female sniper with a prosthetic arm may raise some eyebrows, espcially with how they’re dressed.

I’m also sure barely anyone cares about sexuality. It’s when you let superficial traits try and define your game that turns people away.

Gamergate is really their fictional monster in the closet, their tilting at windmills, their... whatever proper cliche term works here. In essence, being able to harp on Gamergate give them a villain to feel like they're triumphing over some vile, heinous beast, when its just a bunch of losers from one camp (dangerhairs and soyboys who jerk off to their egos and get relationship advice from memes), screeching at a bunch of losers from the other camp (your usual incel neckbeards who jerks off to Overwatch porn and gets relationship advice from moe anime).

They are accomplishing nothing, and the more smug, ass-patting they do, the more they oust themselves as giant flaming hypocrites who are (badly) hiding their own self-hatred and bigotry, behind a rapidly deteriorating veil of self-righteousness.
 
The funny thing about the last of us is that ellie sexuality actually makes sense and its organic. For once it doesn't feel like they just made characther "x" LGBTQIEZZAB!23 just for the sake of it. The only people who seem to complain about it are alt-right neckbeards claiming its some left-wing jewish conspiracy to subvert the west or SJW's complaining its not queer trans-inclusive minority -ish enough.
 
They’re never going to let GamerGate die, will they? Barely anyone has a problem with a female lead (Metroid and Tomb Raider proves this), it’s a matter of whether or not it’s historically accurate to history spergs. When you tout that you’re being as historically accurate as possible, I’m pretty sure jumping out of a building, and having a female sniper with a prosthetic arm may raise some eyebrows, espcially with how they’re dressed.

I’m also sure barely anyone cares about sexuality. It’s when you let superficial traits try and define your game that turns people away.

They'll hold onto Gamegate until the last dried out, rotten threads are snapping one by one. They'll be holding on to its moldy corpse for years to come. It's all they have.

Remember, they wanted to end gamers. Gamers were over. They were patriarchy. They were misogyny. They were rape culture and the male gaze. They were gatekeepers. But Gamergate is so irrelevant in 2018 that to us the whole thing is hilarious and sad. To them it's "totally relevant in the current year".

No one had an issue with Lara being female in the 90s. Same with Samus. No one complained about Alis Landale in the 80s. And she was totally covered up and not a sexual object to her two, several years older than her 15, male party members. Ms. Pac-Man was a huge hit despite having high heels, lipstick and a bow. Because her game was good and it wasn't mired in a bunch of identity politics.

There have been tons of female characters in good lead and supporting roles. Plus, a lot of these SJWs don't dig deep. They only look at big AAA titles and whatever indie flavor of the month is getting enough attention. That's why I don't buy that they are real gamers. If they were so interested in diversity they'd be into the older and more obscure titles because they'd do anything to find characters that suit their tastes. They only scratch the surface to complain. They conveniently ignore anything relevant that isn't popular enough to get them clicks and Patreon bux.
 
Does anyone know exactly where this "muh representation" shit in games/movies/tv/comics/etc. originated?

There's always been a push for more diversity in media but now you can't have something with a fully white and straight cast anymore without backlash. These brats constantly scream about how they want to "see themselves" in media, which is a very new phenomenon. Little kids don't give a fuck if the main character looks like them, they just want to play the games and have fun.
 
The only people who seem to complain about it are alt-right neckbeards claiming its some left-wing jewish conspiracy to subvert the west or SJW's complaining its not queer trans-inclusive minority -ish enough.

There is no conspiracy; they admitted shes a jewish lesbian.

-1528767303502.jpg
 
Does anyone know exactly where this "muh representation" shit in games/movies/tv/comics/etc. originated?

There's always been a push for more diversity in media but now you can't have something with a fully white and straight cast anymore without backlash. These brats constantly scream about how they want to "see themselves" in media, which is a very new phenomenon. Little kids don't give a fuck if the main character looks like them, they just want to play the games and have fun.
A mix of...

a) universities becoming more and more obsessed with the "MUH IDENTITY!" schtick which bled into marketing and PR with the concept of...
"not pandering to offence obsessed crybabies will literally destroy the company because they will call you raysist which will immidiately cause all society to boycott your product line and have you lynched in the street, while pandering to them and ejecting your icky disgusting WHITE MAAAAALE audience and fans will result in every non white/straight/cis/male person on the planet swarming to buy everything you make! oh yeah and dont worry about the fucking white shitlords, they are so pathetic they will continue buying your shit the same as they did before and will be too scared of being called raysist to complain"
...which was taken as fact by out of touch execs and pampered celebs who exist in the same bubble as the pampered academics and inactivists who have been spewing this shit

b) the visible growth of"woke twitter" and tumblr types as a loud and autistic demographic which resulted in the dumb shit said by PR/marketing people being seemingly vindicated....despite the actual numbers of people in this demographic being pretty fucking tiny, with its low numbers being buoyed up artifically by the e-celebs jumping on the opportunity to make themselves look more holy, declare jihad on their enemies, and to cover up bad shit they had done behind the scenes

These factors combined making it imperative to spin EVERYTHING that the companies and celebs who bought into this shit did as being "an unprecedented, revolutionary, and stunningly brave act of progressive heroism that all evil [INSERT BOOGIEMAN HERE] will be shaking their evil fists at in rage....even if the "unprecedented" shit they did is something that has been done a billion times before in a billion better ways. All progressive media before [current year] is retconned out of existence in real time, which is why tomb raider no.123238 is seemingly being spun as the first tomb raider game ever that is shocking the industry to name one example

Basically, nobody involved in any step of this contemptible process actually gives a shit about representation or progressive values or shit. Infact they actively try to rip apart every achievement, every bold progressive step, and all the positive representation of the past half century solely to make the pathetic and derivative horseshit they make look better, and to drive up clicks/attention

Imagine if you will, some utterly inept and worthless sack of shit who had narcissistic fantasies of being hailed as some great palaeontologist and was friends/connected with a bunch of science journalists decided to claim that he had discovered the first dinosaur fossil ever found in human history after finding some rock that looks a bit like a bone in his backyard, and then claiming that the "EEEEEEEEEEEVIL CREATIONIST BIGOTS" were trying to silence him every time somebody pointed out "nigga theyve been finding this shit since the middle ages". Thats basically whats happening

There is no conspiracy; they admitted shes a jewish lesbian.

View attachment 474652
fixed that for ya
BRZOlJW.png
 
Last edited:
They 'won' by doing...what? exactly? What did they win? The right to write inane articles about how girls kissing beat the evil goobergators? Well, okay. Whatever helps this sad little man sleep at night.

Also, using the IT'S CURRENT YEAR as an argument should mean immediate dismissal to the gulags.
They pandered and they won asspats.

Which don't necessarily translate into sales.
 
What I never understood was without gamers, who were they going to sell games to? It's like Ford Motor Company declaring an "end to motorists", well, who exactly is going to be buying your cars?

So they had to clarify what they really meant (We don't want customers who don't align wiht us 100% on the political spectrum)

And to do this, they had to try and draw a distinction between gamers, and "gamers" , and like all purity movements, it ate itself and accomplished nothing.
 
Back