Audrey Hale manifesto a ‘blueprint on total destruction’ say pols, who claim FBI is stalling its release - Soft target terrorism is almost impossible to protect against.

Nashville shooter Audrey Hale’s manifesto is a “blueprint on total destruction” which the FBI are stalling releasing, according to local politicians, who describe its contents as “astronomically dangerous”.

Almost a month after Audrey Hale, who identified as transgender, killed six at the city’s Covenant elementary school before being shot by police authorities have yet to release a motive or any of the writings seized from her home, despite growing pressure.

Rep. Tim Burchett, (R-Tenn.) told The Post he knew the FBI was behind the delay, saying the news was “disappointing” and calling for documents to be released to grieving loved ones as well as members of Congress.

The manifesto “could maybe tell us a little bit about what’s going on inside of her head,” he added. “I think that would answer a lot of questions.”
Twenty journals, five laptops, a suicide note and various other notes written by Hale were seized from the house she shared with her parents as well as two memoirs, five Covenant School yearbooks and seven cellphones, according to a search warrant.

Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston confirmed to The Post the FBI has already ruled the manifesto would not be released in its entirety.
“What I was told is, her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction, and it was so, so detailed at the level of what she had planned,” she said, when reached by phone.
“That document in the wrong person’s hands would be astronomically dangerous,” she added.

Johnston said “parts” of Hale’s writings would eventually come out, but added she feels “the vast, overwhelming majority of it,” presented too much of a danger to the public.
She added: “I personally don’t want to know the depths to which her psychosis reached … When I’m told by an MNPD high-ranking official that it keeps him up at night, I’m going to defer to that person in that agency that I don’t need to read that.”

The two agencies handling the investigation, Metro Nashville Police Department and the FBI, each deferred The Post to the other agency when contacted by The Post. Although MNPD is leading the investigation, spokesperson Don Aaron said material related to Hale is still “under analysis” by the FBI.

Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director David Rausch described the writings he had seen during a meeting with the Tennessee Sheriffs’ Association, reportedly saying: “The documents that we have, and I have viewed those, you know, one is specifically a plan and the other is some journal-type rantings.”

Former police officer-turned author and adjunct professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice Joseph Giacalone said the public “has a right to know” what’s in the manifesto “even if it’s heavily redacted,” but believes authorities are worried about the effect releasing it could have.

“I think what the FBI is really concerned here with, and I think law enforcement, is that if there is something in there that is truly damaging for the transgender community, I think they are hesitant to do it because they are afraid of a violent backlash against that protected class of people.”

However, Giacalone also warned if authorities did release a heavily redacted version of the manifesto, “you run the risk of letting speculation run the day.”
Hale unleashed a hail of 152 bullets during her 14 minute killing spree killing nine-year-olds Evelyn Dieckhaus, Hallie Scruggs and William Kinney as well as school janitor Mike Hill, substitute teacher Cynthia Peak and headmistress Katherine Koonce, who reportedly ran toward the shooter to try to protect the school.
Rasmussen Reports surveyed 971 people in the aftermath and found that 68 percent believed Hale’s alleged manifesto should be released.

“it’s just too much of a risk that that could get into the wrong person’s hands.” -Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) said if the writings are not ultimately released, “then we need to investigate why.”

If released, a large part of the manifesto will be redacted for the specificity of the plans.

Rep. Walter Hudson (R-Minn.) has also pushed for their release. He recalled to The Post conversations with citizens who have expressed “increasing distrust with the FBI and with government agencies generally.”

“One of the greatest threats to democracy or, as I would say, threats to the Constitutional Republic, is the erosion of trust in institutions. The FBI is one of those institutions,” he said, adding he thinks public trust in the intelligence agency has wavered. He added: “If you’re going to wield power in a free country, then you have a responsibility to maintain the public’s trust in that power – and the FBI needs to figure out how to do that.”

Archive: https://archive.ph/LAnnh#selection-1943.0-2163.448
Source: https://nypost.com/2023/04/20/audre...tion-say-pols-who-claim-fbi-stalling-release/
 
I wonder if her parents phones were included in that number? They may have just had a broad "seize all electronics on the premises" warrant, to hell with who actually owned them.
Very likely it's that. It's likely the police seized all electronics from their house and they were then all declared as belonging to them in the process of the investigation.
 
There's a chance this manifesto contains detailed plans of poisoning public water systems, deliberately causing traffic or air accidents, sabotaging chemical plants to cause environmental disasters, or selling hot dogs made with the meat of deers with prion diseases (the notorious serial killer & niglet rapist Carl Panzram at one point planned sinking ships in ports to start a war so people with a grudge against society sometimes can think big, at least in theory). There's a chance a mentally deranged woman on SSRIs came up with all these meticulous plans then just decided to shoot a few kids with a $600 Kel-Tec instead

There's also a chance the manifesto is just "be trans do crime" repeated over and over again, and explicitly pointing out that the trans ideology is a deranged terrorist death cult would not do much to improve the ESG score of whoever would made the document public

I wonder what is more probable
 
There's a chance this manifesto contains detailed plans of poisoning public water systems,
And if it does, all it says it literally "poison water supply" - that's it.

No note of with what chemicals, where they intend to get them, how they intend to pay for them, where they intend to introduce them to the supply, etc etc etc.

But the fact it says "Do Mega Crime" is enough for the FBI to declare it the necromicon itself.
 
There were some reports that she had planned on targeting another school, but that it was a more secure location than the one she did attack. It's possible that there are some detailed descriptions/plans for other very specific soft targets and the feds would be pretty fucking irresponsible (well more than they already are) to release the documents without informing the named parties or ensuring that any serious vulnerabilities weren't hardened before dropping that information. They look stupid withholding the documents, but a lot worse if were to dump them only for some crazy copy-cat troon to shoot up some church named in the manifesto in order to finish what this crazy bitch started.
 
Any manifesto written by a female isn't going to be any more sound/technical in regards to terrorism related matters than any of the ones written by male autists we've seen.

Its 100% political i.e. troon shit.
 
Anyone who has even casually observed LGBT spaces, particularly the AFAB transtrender spaces, over the past ten years can probably guess what is in the manifesto with 90% accuracy. This is tumblr-tier Down With Cis crap, but literally so.
 
Not enough rainbows in the world for the people who think the FBI's not releasing this because it's full of brilliant mass shooting tactics.

It's absolutely a straight confession of what anyone with two brain cells guessed immediately after hearing a tranny shot up a Christian school.
 
Hmm I hate to sound like a conspiracist here but the FBI won't release it either because

A: some zippertit unveiled a master plan to unravel the entire us government but didn't carry it out or publish it because reasons

B: it'd make trannies look bad and hurt pharma company stocks

🤔
If people can actually think chopping your son's nuts off and embrittling his bones will somehow make him a girl, and the doctors responsible for advancing this hogwash weren't beaten severely for even coming close to suggesting such when they did, I don't think there's anything that could accomplish B) short of the discovery that cross-sex hormones turn their recipients into nuclear warheads.

The only justifiable reason I can see for withholding it is if it talks about in exact detail how to best commit a school shooting and they're afraid that there will be copycat mass shootings in response that just follow the plan they outlined.
If they were really afraid of copycats, at this point, they'd try to disseminate the idea that History won't look kindly on people who do news reports on school shootings on anything more than a local scale.
 
Back