- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Speculation. We do not know if there is any DNA evidence.-DNA evidence of chris diddling his mom
Heilberg would most definitely try to make any mention of previous crimes inadmissible.-history of violence offenses
As above. Also hearsay.-history of stalking and sexual harassment
His gender is irrelevant to the law.-obvious sham "transgender status"
Irrelevant.-clear abuse of his autism disability status to be a wellfare leach and get out of consequences in the past that went unpunished
Only relevant thing here, but only if they subpoena the parties he confessed to in order to get the phonecalls/texts or testimony.-confessed his crimes to multiple people
That would most likely only be relevant in sentencing, if at all.-no regret for his actions
Hearsay, and even if it's not, it would again only be relevant in sentencing.-clear intent to reoffend
We all want to see Chris fry, but come on, be reasonable.
The legal system is, well, a system. There are rules. Your idea of a "trial" is more akin to an angry mob.