August 8th review

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm convinced that Toadstool Toes' daddy, not Liz Dong Gone, is the one running around to ISPs and infrastructure providers to take us offline.

What we revealed about ILJ got her expelled from Texas Tech. He wants revenge, and has far more influence than Brickface thanks to his cybersecurity business and CIA connections .
I think ILJ is done with Chris tbh, probably won't hear from her again unless its on a Code Blue Cam video on YouTube or something

As for her galpal Louis Herz, seems like he was facing some kind of legal trouble recently so I don't think he'll be around much either
1691527142566.png
 
Emphasis on the words 'could be'. Personally I doubt this will be the last we hear of him. But he has been very quiet these past few months which is why I think there is a possibility that this may continue depending on if he is given any form of oversight during this review.
The reason he's quiet is that I think Heilberg added an internet ban to the deferment, once the charges are gone that goes away.
 
So what's the likely outcome? Throw into Men's prison where he will be raped or a Woman's prison where he will do the raping? Put him in a padded cell? Or live the rest of his life in a halfway home for tards?
Most likely? No sex-pest registration, no more jail time, probation and a protective order for Barb, and stuck in a home with several other spastics for the rest of time.
Oooh, bonus points if they smack him with an internet ban. It'd be in his absolute best interest to do it, but it's really unlikely.
 
The reason he's quiet is that I think Heilberg added an internet ban to the deferment, once the charges are gone that goes away.
That is a distinct possibility, but my understanding is that a full on internet ban is very difficult to obtain under US law. Personally I'm more of the mind that either; A). The group home he's currently under has restricted his access, or B). Going online was an autistic habit of his which he now no longer has the ability to indulge in, and is therefore no longer something that interests him.
 
I'll say Chris spends the rest of his life in a group home or some other living arrangement, and if his charges drop and he's allowed to go wild on the internet, it will be like before, only no Barb, and no Sonichu Temple. So, he gets the easiest way out, a roof over his head and enough McDonalds and vidya to spend the rest of his life with.
 
Oooh, bonus points if they smack him with an internet ban. It'd be in his absolute best interest to do it, but it's really unlikely.
If it isn't out the gate and he does end up in a spastic house, he might just end up breaking some sort of rule they have and get slapped with an Internet ban further down the line. He's got enough of a history for them to at least consider it at this next appearance.
 
How much of Chris's faults are his direct responsibility? It's easy for us to look at him and say "he should have learned" and/or "he knows what he's doing" but can we be sure of that? I think not.

Nah, Chris is just a bad person who doesn't care about right and wrong. His decision-making flowchart has exactly two branches: "Do I want to do it?" and "Do I think I can get away with it?"
 
Nah, Chris is just a bad person who doesn't care about right and wrong. His decision-making flowchart has exactly two branches: "Do I want to do it?" and "Do I think I can get away with it?"

Thats how a child thinks, and if you're saying he's mentally a child, which I would agree with at least on some levels, then we shouldnt expect him to have a mature view of right, wrong, and consequences.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back