Aunt Jemima brand to change name, remove image that Quaker says is 'based on a racial stereotype' - Syrup Lives Matter

Article: http://archive.is/pi6Os

The Aunt Jemima brand of syrup and pancake mix will get a new name and image, Quaker Oats announced Wednesday, saying the company recognizes that "Aunt Jemima's origins are based on a racial stereotype."

The 130-year-old brand features a Black woman named Aunt Jemima, who was originally dressed as a minstrel character.

The picture has changed over time, and in recent years Quaker removed the “mammy” kerchief from the character to blunt growing criticism that the brand perpetuated a racist stereotype that dated to the days of slavery. But Quaker, a subsidiary of PepsiCo, said removing the image and name is part of an effort by the company “to make progress toward racial equality.”

“We recognize Aunt Jemima’s origins are based on a racial stereotype," Kristin Kroepfl, vice president and chief marketing officer of Quaker Foods North America, said in a press release. “As we work to make progress toward racial equality through several initiatives, we also must take a hard look at our portfolio of brands and ensure they reflect our values and meet our consumers’ expectations."

Kroepfl said the company has worked to "update" the brand to be "appropriate and respectful" but it realized the changes were insufficient.

Aunt Jemima has faced renewed criticism recently amid protests across the nation and around the world sparked by the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis police custody.

People on social media called out the brand for continuing to use the image and discussed its racist history, with the topic trending on Twitter.

“It’s time to let go of symbols like this because of how weighted they are and what they represent,” Riché Richardson, an associate professor at Cornell University, told the “TODAY” show on Wednesday.

Aunt Jemima is “a retrograde image of black womanhood on store shelves," Richardson said. “It’s an image that harkens back to the antebellum plantation ... Aunt Jemima is that kind of stereotype is premised on this idea of black inferiority and otherness.”

The company's own timeline of the product says Aunt Jemima was first "brought to life" by Nancy Green, a black woman who was formerly enslaved and became the face of the product in 1890.

In 2015, a judge dismissed a lawsuit against the company by two men who claimed to be descendants of Anna Harrington, a black woman who began portraying Jemima in the 1930s, saying the company didn't properly compensate her estate with royalties.

Quaker said the new packaging will begin to appear in the fall of 2020, and a new name for the foods will be announced at a later date.

The company also announced it will donate at least $5 million over the next five years "to create meaningful, ongoing support and engagement in the Black community."
 
I completely get updating the old logo. While I don't get racist vibe from it I can understand why others might, especially after seeing some of the old adds. The new logo otherhand? Nah that just a generic if somewhat creepy middle age black woman. First land-o-lakes and now this? Pretty soon there won't be anything but white people on logos because they are the only ones you can be racist towards.

And then, $50 says people will start boycotting and burning shit because of "White supremacy in advertising mascots, the lack of African-American iconography is clearly because corporations are racist and average people associate black people on the box with the product being dirty and unsavory!" Completely forgetting THEY asked for this in the first place.

You buy Uncle Ben, you're a racist because you revel in making the black man a purchasable commodity

You don't buy Uncle Ben, you're a racist because you are avoiding a product because of black people

You remove him so you don't have a choice, that's racist too, because you just erased him

And when people call for him to come back ? That'll be racist too.

You can't win.
 
Like, who even asked for this?

Was it /pol/? I bet it was /pol/.

/pol/ is (somehow) one of the few places who will argue in favor of keeping these brand caricatures.

A lot of them probably just want to laugh at the funny nigger on their breakfast cereal, but an equal amount will argue these mascots are a part of history. Not just because they have been around a long time, but because they, in some cases, represent the actual people who used to grow (or otherwise help produce) these products. You may as well remove images of Italians picking olives on a package of olive oil.

AG-Design-Agency_Levantes-Family-Olive-oil_01.jpg
 
And then, $50 says people will start boycotting and burning shit because of "White supremacy in advertising mascots, the lack of African-American iconography is clearly because corporations are racist and average people associate black people on the box with the product being dirty and unsavory!" Completely forgetting THEY asked for this in the first place.

You buy Uncle Ben, you're a racist because you revel in making the black man a purchasable commodity

You don't buy Uncle Ben, you're a racist because you are avoiding a product because of black people

You remove him so you don't have a choice, that's racist too, because you just erased him

And when people call for him to come back ? That'll be racist too.

You can't win.
The only way to be a good ally to these idiots is to immediately cease to exist.
 
Oh my god you're such a normie in every topic. We'll teach you yet. :feels:
Any food that uses syrup is normie tier bugman food. Imagine having to coat something in sugar like a toddler to make it palatable and then having the balls to talk about what other people eat.

Fuck Canada.
 
The only way to be a good ally to these idiots is to immediately cease to exist.

That wouldn't be enough either.

If white people up and vanished today.... everyone left would STILL accuse people in their own ranks they didn't like of "acting white" or "having white sympathy" or "Having absorbed white racism to the point that now YOU are the NEW racists"

it's why racism is so fuckin' DUMB and can't really be "solved" , some folks are just nasty, live with it instead of trying to find an equitable way to make nastiness illegal without destroying society in the process.
 
Last edited:
Careful, they might change her into a generic bottle next because it "fat shames" chubby old women.

I for one look forward to products that are sold in unappealing boxes and bottles that are colored not too white to be offensive but not too dark as to make people think it is for the superior ethnics only.

The packaging will contain no art or slogans rather it will simply read: __________ Product.

Hair Product

Cheese Product

Chemical Castration Product

Oh who am I kidding that last one will be added to the food.
 
And then, $50 says people will start boycotting and burning shit because of "White supremacy in advertising mascots, the lack of African-American iconography is clearly because corporations are racist and average people associate black people on the box with the product being dirty and unsavory!" Completely forgetting THEY asked for this in the first place.

You buy Uncle Ben, you're a racist because you revel in making the black man a purchasable commodity

You don't buy Uncle Ben, you're a racist because you are avoiding a product because of black people

You remove him so you don't have a choice, that's racist too, because you just erased him

And when people call for him to come back ? That'll be racist too.

You can't win.

Is the Chef Boyardee mascot next because it reinforces harmful Italian stereotypes?
 
Back