UN Australia and Canada pull rape and incest game that tells players to be 'women's worst nightmare' - The following story contains reference to sexual assault, violence against women and misogyny.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
L/A
IMG_2944.webp
The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer.". Picture: No Mercy on Steam

By Asher McShane
A game that touts itself as an "incest and non-consensual sex' simulator has been pulled from the world's biggest PC gaming platform in Australia and Canada as pressure mounts on UK authorities to follow suit.

The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer."

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who is responsible for overseeing the government's online safety strategy, described the game as "deeply worrying" and demanded the tech giant take it down.

The game launched on Steam last month and is described by its own developers as containing violence, incest, blackmail, and what they describe as "unavoidable non-consensual sex."

After LBC revealed it was still available on Steam in the UK, it emerged that Australian and Canadian officials had swiftly made it unavailable for download.

Officials in Australia pulled it for being ‘unclassified’. A spokesman for Australia’s department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts said: “The computer game, No Mercy, is unclassified and has now been removed from sale from the Steam platform in Australia.”

Efforts to have the game removed in Australia were spearheaded by campaign group Collective Shout who wrote to the country’s regulator as well as launching a global petition.

After a public backlash the game was also removed from Steam in Canada after less than 24 hours.

Pepe Di'Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School of College Leaders told LBC: “Just copy Australia. Australia seems to have got a grip on this, they seem to have acted swiftly.

"They realise they have to protect young people who are at the heart of this… I think that we’ve got a game of tennis taking place between Ofcom and tech companies, what we’re seeing is people blaming one another.

"Let’s get the legislation doing what it should do and let’s make sure we can protect the young people who are most at threat from this right now.”
IMG_2945.webp
The video game has 'very positive' reviews from sick users on Steam. Picture: Steam

The game requires a card to buy, but has minimal age-verification checks, with campaigners warning it could be downloaded by children.

“Adult themes exist in video games, but I’m so shocked and surprised by this,” LBC's tech correspondent Will Guyatt said.

“There's probably about 3.5 million active Steam accounts in the UK… I just don't see how this can be openly, easily available and also importantly not removed when people like myself have reported it as unsuitable.”

LBC created a Steam account with full access to adult content by simply ticking boxes claiming to be 18+, and was able to download No Mercy for £9.99.

“Tech companies make it as easy as possible for kids to go on and put in a fake age and put in a card,” child mental health expert Nova Eden said.

She says many parents will be under the misconception that sites like Steam are “a game shop, a social network,” and therefore assume they are properly moderated.

In reality, Steam is not signed up to any age-rating frameworks like PEGI, a content rating system established to help European consumers make informed decisions when buying video games through the use of approved age recommendations and content descriptors.

Anyone can upload a game for sale on the site, which then sits alongside products developed by regulated, mainstream games studios.

LBC reported the game to Steam as inappropriate five days ago. It has still not been taken down, or subject to more stringent controls.
IMG_2946.webp
The game's presence online also raises questions about the regulator Ofcom’s ability to properly moderate content.

It began its crackdown on harmful online content last month as part of the Government’s Online Safety Act, but the regulator told LBC it “can’t investigate individual complaints.”

That’s despite chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes saying as part of LBC’s Online Safety Day last month: “Our under-18s deserve a very different experience to the one they’re getting now, so no pornography, and a significant down-ranking of things like violent content, misogyny.”

The body is due to publish its “children’s codes” which will set out requirements for sites to protect young people online. Tech firms will then have three months to carry out risk assessments.

“I'm very interested to see how [Steam’s parent-company Valve] will justify that topics like this are acceptable in a game, and if they do deem them acceptable, they should make it a hell of a lot harder for your everyday consumer to be able to find,” Guyatt said.

“It's intriguing to see where this fits under the Online Safety Bill.”

Mr Kyle, who is facing pressure over the potential watering down of the Online Safety Act, insisted that Steam should remove the game from its marketplace.

He told LBC: “We expect every one of those [tech] companies to remove content as soon as they possibly can after being made aware of it. That’s what the law requires, it is what I require as a secretary of state, and it is certainly how we expect platforms who operate and have the privilege of access to British society, and British economy, to do.”

Mr Kyle also suggested that the regulator should make a call on whether the game should remain online.

"Ofcom is the regulator," Mr Kyle said. "They are tasked with enforcing and they will make the judgment as to whether content is removed in an appropriate time."

A spokesperson for the Games Rating Authority said:"Game ratings provide parents and players information about the content of video games.

In the UK, physical game releases must carry a PEGI age rating by law. Digital games are not legally required to carry an age rating, but the majority of leading stores use the trusted PEGI age rating process to provide confidence to consumers.

Although games on Steam can optionally apply for a PEGI age rating via our classification process, it is not mandated by the platform prior to a game's release.

The Games Rating Authority has not classified this game and has not been approach to classify it since its release."

Steam did not respond to LBC's requests for comment.
 
Gamergate and metoo has mindraped an entire generation of men. This game isn't a hill worth dying on. Its fucking garbage deviantart slop no one would care about if nanny overlords like Australia and Canada didn't censor it.
I don't know what eceleb has started to push the 50 shades thing but whenever I see it brought up I question if the people talking about it are old enough to remember when it was a fad. It got popular for being LAUGHABLY terrible, its so fucking bad it can't even count as porn. Popular does not mean people think its good. It was a trend to read it because it was just that fucking bad. Its like Twilight. Hell, it WAS a Twilight fanfic at first, wasn't it?
 
It got popular for being LAUGHABLY terrible, its so fucking bad it can't even count as porn. Popular does not mean people think its good
I don't think novel readers have the knee jerk reaction nature to buy shit novels just because. I've certainly bought hilariously bad games for memes but, this sounds like total bs. Especially for the pure level of success.

Also I don't think it's any eceleb so much as noticing theres seemingly more tolerance for weird female sexuality crap than men's, is what it's pointing at.
 
Gamergate and metoo has mindraped an entire generation of men. This game isn't a hill worth dying on. Its fucking garbage deviantart slop no one would care about if nanny overlords like Australia and Canada didn't censor it.
I don't know what eceleb has started to push the 50 shades thing but whenever I see it brought up I question if the people talking about it are old enough to remember when it was a fad. It got popular for being LAUGHABLY terrible, its so fucking bad it can't even count as porn. Popular does not mean people think its good. It was a trend to read it because it was just that fucking bad. Its like Twilight. Hell, it WAS a Twilight fanfic at first, wasn't it?
Women didn’t make Twilight a billion dollar multimedia franchise because they were laughing at it.
 
Also I don't think it's any eceleb so much as noticing theres seemingly more tolerance for weird female sexuality crap than men's, is what it's pointing at.
That's understandable. Its just weird to see 50 shades specifically be brought up after all these years, I assume someone specific started using it as an example.
I don't think novel readers have the knee jerk reaction nature to buy shit novels just because.
It was a trend to read and react to it. I remember, I avoided it because I believed the media was artificially pushing the book. It was a combination of bad writing, book sales going up, and article after article coming out of how misogynistic and dangerous the book was that made people curious. I'm not denying some people genuinely liked it, just like there are some men that would genuinely jerk it to games like this. But its not the majority... not at all.
Women didn’t make Twilight a billion dollar multimedia franchise because they were laughing at it.
Well its not because its considered high art either. Everyone knows its ridiculous and mediocre. Its fun to talk about... "so bad its good" kind of thing. At least, thats what I've gathered from seeing women talk about it. I never read or watched it other than little bits and pieces of the bad parts like creepy CGI baby...
Now there was genuine fans that defended it back in the day. They were very fun to rile up... same with the 1Ders and Beliebers... but this is going very off topic now.
 
Its just weird to see 50 shades specifically be brought up after all these years, I assume someone specific started using it as an example.
To be fair I think its selected because it's so prolific. And very centrally targeted towards females. It's kinda just default the example since anything else seems fringe.
was a trend to read and react to it. I remember, I avoided it because I believed the media was artificially pushing the book. It was a combination of bad writing, book sales going up, and article after article coming out of how misogynistic and dangerous the book was that made people curious.
Those all occured AFTER success though. It was successful, which made it a conversation piece, which made people buy it ironically. I assure you there's thousands of other similar books, but they didn't blow up
Its fun to talk about... "so bad its good" kind of thing. At least, thats what I've gathered from seeing women talk about it. I never read or watched it other than little bits and pieces of the bad parts like creepy CGI baby...
It kinda functions as porn for women, since women are more about the relationship and feels ect. But it's basically about a basic bitch girl with multiple insanely strong men wanting her, and she doesn't really have to do shit other pick between 2 demi gods who "need" her. And these guys of course NEVER have eyes for other girls

It's not too different than your average porn experience for men, where a man has a hot girl who's MADLY into him/he has her, and will do any dirty thing, is always eye candy, and doesn't require shit from him / other men seem to not exist in it.

It's designed for max feel good and gratification, to make you feel like you are the only one in the world, ect. The women saying it was just "funny" were likely just lying because it sounds better than them saying they flick their bean to the idea of sparkly vampire abs.
 
There is actually tons of porn slop on steam, a lot of it worse than this both quality and morality wise.

If you go around awarding them with "super dangerous bad for everyone" awards and medals you're just gonna make it more appealing. 95% of the people that play those low effort VN games don't talk to real women much less pursue or abuse them, they lock themselves in their goon caves.

You risk making them "forbidden fruit" almost no child is going to spend time and effort figuring out how to buy a porn game without their parents finding out mostly because they're usually bad and free porn is everywhere. But they might be willing to do that for the "globally banned edgy nightmare simulator".

Every group whether it be racial or sex or social or what has a level of "social and political capital" blacks spend all theirs on getting murderers free and gibs, over time it loses value and becomes less important.

Gays use it on sex offenders and getting close to children.

If women use it going after a weird subsect coomers that they realistically will never interact with then you're just kneecapping yourselves.

I ignore crack whores and dumb skanks that give birth to felons and date abusive retards because sooner or later they tend to get themselves killed or taken out of the equation. They're self defeating.

I would also ignore a game called "rapeclaim simulator" about blackmailing people by faking sex crime accusations.

And if you genuinely think someone would play this slop and "be inspired" then to quote my personal hero and the handsomest British man to ever live "I wouldn't even rape you"
 
There really is some irony about you being so sexual that you can't imagine me being against rape for any reason other than I want to have sex which I really couldn't care less about.
Ok white knight beta faggot. LOL
There's literally no difference between jumping on a Goomba's head in Super Mario Bros. and raping an entire family in Rapelay. Entirely indistinguishable.


I think the former has more weight than the latter, especially since it's actually a popular genre among women.


That's the most retarded shit every time I hear it.


If anything they probably fund them.
The only thing retarded here is you.
 
Back