- Joined
- Mar 4, 2015
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Passes better than our cows, but that's not exactly a high bar to accomplish. Still doesn't pass for a biological woman, though.
I flipped through the thread and didn’t see Valeria Lukyanova posted yet. She got a ton of surgery to look like a Barbie, claims to only eat air, and is also an extraterrestrialView attachment 1634100View attachment 1634101View attachment 1634102View attachment 1634103
I suppose in a way the surgeries weren’t done badly, but she just looks incredibly unnerving now
At this point, barbie kardashian deserves his own thread. Hes a frequent flyer on both tranny news and tranny sideshows. Thinking of making a thread on him, is it a good idea?
![]()
Those lips and cheekbones...
The problem is that the psycho's already in jail (women's jail, unfortunately). I'd ask the mods what would the best course of action be, I'd be interested in watching this clown or a small thread that gave news updates on his case.At this point, barbie kardashian deserves his own thread. Hes a frequent flyer on both tranny news and tranny sideshows. Thinking of making a thread on him, is it a good idea?
I thought both of the Olsen twins have struggled with eating disorders and substance abuse? Either way Nicki Minaj has had a shitton of plastic surgery, probably more than either of the Olsen twins combined. She's pretty open about that fact too, and while it doesn't mean she looks bad I'd hardly use her as an example of black people naturally aging better than whites. Hell, Nicki has had so much work done that pre-surgery photos of her literally look like a different person. Combined with the fact that as others have mentioned eating disorders and substance abuse will age the fuck out of you that magazine was using a pretty shitty example to push their racist nonsense.
we’re about to move in together. 3 trans girls in london & thriving luv
I may be late to this thread and I'm not sure if this has been said already, but looking at current pictures of the Olsen twins you can quite clearly see that they are still anorexic. They are extremely emaciated (as they have been since early teens). I know one went to rehab specifically for anorexia but when you look at them from teen years to now, I would put money on them both suffering with eating disorders. I don't think they look well and even though they're standing next to Nikki who's had all these surgeries, you can see Nikki has a fuller weight and thus more youthful complexion.
Anorexia may be 'cute' while you're a teen to twenty-something and may keep you looking like that pre-teen you don't want to grow up from, but the moment you approach 30 that shit will make you look haggard fast. Faster than any drug abuse or botched surgery. Anorexia is a bitch. Don't believe me? Look at Karen Carpenter when she was 28.
I don't want to derail this thread but I often see the affects of anorexia long term being mistaken for botched surgery, and I wanted to clear it up.
lol what a cope, yeah I can explain it:
It’s because Paul is dead and that’s his doppelgänger as the conspiracy goes.Paul McCartney was known as "the cute Beatle", so it seems odd that he'd have even considered getting plastic surgery in his prime. Apparently he did though, as these two photographs were taken less than a year apart ("Yesterday and Today" in '66 to "Sgt. Pepper" in '67), and the difference between them is jarring:
WTF happened? He went from a round, boyish face--much like our dear leader's--to a horse face with a long crooked chin. (He also seemed to have aged by about a decade.)
implying brittons can be cutePaul McCartney was known as "the cute Beatle", so it seems odd that he'd have even considered getting plastic surgery in his prime. Apparently he did though, as these two photographs were taken less than a year apart ("Yesterday and Today" in '66 to "Sgt. Pepper" in '67), and the difference between them is jarring:
WTF happened? He went from a round, boyish face--much like our dear leader's--to a horse face with a long crooked chin. (He also seemed to have aged by about a decade.)
Rude. We can't help it.implying brittons can be cute
is this not just the quality of the photos + quality of the mustache making him look weird? These photos are from March 66, 67 and 68 and the only difference I'm seeing is poor facial hair choices in the middle one.Paul McCartney was known as "the cute Beatle", so it seems odd that he'd have even considered getting plastic surgery in his prime. Apparently he did though, as these two photographs were taken less than a year apart ("Yesterday and Today" in '66 to "Sgt. Pepper" in '67), and the difference between them is jarring:
WTF happened? He went from a round, boyish face--much like our dear leader's--to a horse face with a long crooked chin. (He also seemed to have aged by about a decade.)
Rude. We can't help it.
is this not just the quality of the photos + quality of the mustache making him look weird? These photos are from March 66, 67 and 68 and the only difference I'm seeing is poor facial hair choices in the middle one.
View attachment 1658978
View attachment 1658983
View attachment 1658980
Oh I see, tbh I've never actually investigated this particular rabbit hole before. That's very... thorough.Explained here: https://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html